Attention...

Thread Tools
  #111  
Old 09-20-2009, 04:36 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Your definition of bigotry is way off when you accuse me of being a bigot. Neither Christianity or Islam are racial or ethnic groups. You don't like what I say so you attempt to shut me down by calling me a bigot or racist. You fail to prove your point so you revert to personal attacks and name calling.:roll:

This thread has gotten way off track.
 
  #112  
Old 09-20-2009, 04:49 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by GMAN
You get upset even when I agree with you?
I was MOCKING them, since you were professing a bunch of crazy conspiracy theories that are commonly associated with them.

I would think that if he was not a natural born citizen that something would have been proven by this point. By his secrecy he has fueled more speculation. And as far as I know he has still never made either his birth certificate or college records public. When people hide their past it makes people curious.
I guess that CERTIFIED Hawaiian birth certificate, which has been checked by countless government officials, both conservative and liberal, is imaginary. But you don't want it to be true, so I'm sure you'll spout the typical Birther nonsense about it not being a REAL birth certificate (even though it's been certified as real by the REPUBLICAN Governor of Hawaii)


My problem with Obama is with his policies.
No, your problem is that you don't like Obama, so you're coming up with crazy conspiracy theories to try to discount him. So far in this thread, you've professed:

1. Obama is secretly a Muslim
2. Muslims want to overthrow our government
3. Obama is helping them do it
4. A Muslim terrorist is the same as any other Muslim
5. Anyone who has ever killed in the name of God is not really a Christian, and somehow that same standard doesn't apply to Islam
6. Those who don't speak out against, or apologize for bad things done in the name of their religion are just as guilty as those who committed the atrocities in the first place
7. The President and the Democrats in Congress are trying to destroy the country
8. The President has circumvented the Constitution by appointing czars (I'll come back to this one later, lol)
9. The President is like Hitler
10. The words "Freedom of Religion" supposedly appear in the Constitution
11. Islam is taught in our schools
12. Obama might not have been born in the US

Have I missed any?

Okay, back to the "czar" issue. Do you even have a CLUE what a "czar" is? Or are you simply buying what you're being told one is? I'll give you a hint: A "czar," as the term is being used today, is an ADVISOR to the President. EVERY President has them. The term was coined by RONALD REAGAN, when he appointed the first drug czar back in the 80's. Since then, it's been the commonly accepted term for Presidential advisors. It has NOTHING to do with circumventing the Constitution or the Congress, and EVERYTHING to do with helping Obama make better informed decisions. Reagan had them, Bush 1 had them, Clinton had them, Bush Jr. had them, and now Obama has them. Plus every other President of the 20th Century had them, only they weren't called "czars" back then.

So basically, you're complaining that Obama has advisors. LOL.

You said it best back on page 1 of this thread when you were accusing government officials of trying to divide the country, and later when you were accusing people like Jackson and Sharpton of doing the same:

Originally Posted by GMAN
As long as the politicians can pit one group against the other they can control the masses. There are those who are taking money from both ends. It isn't right, no matter who is doing it.
It seems you've bought what they are selling, since you seem hellbent on helping them pitting one group against another. You want to criticize Obama's policies? Then go right ahead! You don't have to help disseminate garbage about Muslims and Hitler etc. like you have in this thread to do so. If the FACTS aren't good enough, then maybe it's not his policies you really don't like.....
 
  #113  
Old 09-20-2009, 04:50 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by GMAN
Your definition of bigotry is way off when you accuse me of being a bigot. Neither Christianity or Islam are racial or ethnic groups.
Last I checked, Muslims are most certainly an ethnic group. And bigotry does not only apply to racial and ethnic groups. It can apply to religious groups, political groups, etc.

This thread has gotten way off track.
This thread was off track the second the OP hit the submit button on that racist (and completely false) statement.
 
  #114  
Old 09-20-2009, 05:56 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
I was MOCKING them, since you were professing a bunch of crazy conspiracy theories that are commonly associated with them.



I guess that CERTIFIED Hawaiian birth certificate, which has been checked by countless government officials, both conservative and liberal, is imaginary. But you don't want it to be true, so I'm sure you'll spout the typical Birther nonsense about it not being a REAL birth certificate (even though it's been certified as real by the REPUBLICAN Governor of Hawaii)

I don't know if it is a real birth certificate or not. I have not seen it. All I know is what I have heard. And as I stated above, if he were not a citizen I would think that someone would have come forward and proven it. Of course, there is still the matter of his academic records. To my knowledge, every president has made his records public. When someone refuses to do so then it is assumed that they have something to hide.




No, your problem is that you don't like Obama, so you're coming up with crazy conspiracy theories to try to discount him. So far in this thread, you've professed:

I don't recall mentioning anything about a conspiracy.

1. Obama is secretly a Muslim

I only related what I heard Obama state in a speech.

2. Muslims want to overthrow our government

Of course they do. They have stated as much. They want to convert or destroy anyone who gets in their way to force the world to accept Islam. And what do you think the attacks on 9/11 were all about? They wanted to bring down our government. It wasn't only the trade center that was attacked. The Pentagon was also attacked and it is speculated that had the passengers not taken control of the last plane that it would have either hit the White House or Capital.

3. Obama is helping them do it

I don't recall specifically making a statement such as you noted. However, he is destroying this country with the programs and policies he is initiating. And that can help the terrorists to achieve their goals.

4. A Muslim terrorist is the same as any other Muslim

I don't recall having said this either. I did say that my their silence they were supporting terrorism. I still stand by that statement.

5. Anyone who has ever killed in the name of God is not really a Christian, and somehow that same standard doesn't apply to Islam

Christianity teaches that we should not kill. It is one of the 10 commandments.

6. Those who don't speak out against, or apologize for bad things done in the name of their religion are just as guilty as those who committed the atrocities in the first place
7. The President and the Democrats in Congress are trying to destroy the country

This is true. Everything this president has done since he assumed office goes against everything this country stands for. He has taken over the U.S. auto industry, banking and insurance industries, or at least a large portion of them. That is socialism, not capitalism. It is not the right or obligation of this government to take over ANY business. Capitalism gives business the right to succeed or fail. It isn't up to the government to take over failing business or put tax payer money at risk. It is also not constitutional for the government for force healthcare on it's citizens. This president and congress are out of control. They are spending money like a group of drunken sailors on a long weekend leave. The only problem is that they are spending money they don't have. They are jeopardizing the future of our country and citizens and putting us into servitude to our creditors. Rather than expanding government they should be reducing the size of government and cutting spending.

8. The President has circumvented the Constitution by appointing czars (I'll come back to this one later, lol)

There is a constitutional process for those who hold sensitive positions in government. None of his appointee's have apparently gone through any background check. In fact, Obama himself would not likely have passed a security check based on his past associations alone.

9. The President is like Hitler

Perhaps you would prefer Stalin, Lenin, Mao? Obama is acting like a dictator. He is attempting to act against the will of the people.


10. The words "Freedom of Religion" supposedly appear in the Constitution

I don't recall stating that "Freedom of Religion" appears in the constitution. The constitution does provide for freedom of religion. Basically, it prohibits the government from preventing us from worshiping as we will. At least it is supposed to work that way. Try praying in school or reading the Bible and you will bring a lot of trouble down on yourself. It is unconstitutional for the government to interfere in people who choose to pray or read their Bible anywhere. That hasn't stopped the liberals from pushing their agenda and ignoring the constitution.

11. Islam is taught in our schools

Some schools have been reading and studying the Koran. It has been on the national news.

12. Obama might not have been born in the US

You are repeating yourself.

Have I missed any?

Okay, back to the "czar" issue. Do you even have a CLUE what a "czar" is? Or are you simply buying what you're being told one is? I'll give you a hint: A "czar," as the term is being used today, is an ADVISOR to the President. EVERY President has them. The term was coined by RONALD REAGAN, when he appointed the first drug czar back in the 80's. Since then, it's been the commonly accepted term for Presidential advisers. It has NOTHING to do with circumventing the Constitution or the Congress, and EVERYTHING to do with helping Obama make better informed decisions. Reagan had them, Bush 1 had them, Clinton had them, Bush Jr. had them, and now Obama has them. Plus every other President of the 20th Century had them, only they weren't called "czars" back then.

So basically, you're complaining that Obama has advisers. LOL.

No I am complaining that he has attempted to bypass the congress by appointing so many czars. These people should have gone through background checks and been interviewed by congress. As far as I know, neither has happened. He doesn't want to answer to congress. Not that it makes much difference. This congress seems to be a rubber stamp for whatever he wants to do. If this were George Bush, all hell would have broken lose by now.


You said it best back on page 1 of this thread when you were accusing government officials of trying to divide the country, and later when you were accusing people like Jackson and Sharpton of doing the same:

They are doing just that by pitting blacks against whites. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have made a fortune by convincing blacks that whites are responsible for all their problems. They could have encouraged blacks to stay in school and learn a trade or get a college degree. Instead, they blame whites for their failures. And the government has done blacks the most harm by encouraging a dependency on the government rather than encouraging them to move out of their poverty. It is a way for some to stay in power. After all, who would vote against their paycheck? There have been many blacks who have made it out of poverty in spite of government. Jackson and Sharpton like to blame rather than encourage people. People need to take responsibility for their actions and themselves regardless of race. They get their power by dividing us. Imagine what this country would be like if we didn't look at race?



It seems you've bought what they are selling, since you seem hellbent on helping them pitting one group against another. You want to criticize Obama's policies? Then go right ahead! You don't have to help disseminate garbage about Muslims and Hitler etc. like you have in this thread to do so. If the FACTS aren't good enough, then maybe it's not his policies you really don't like.....
I didn't realize that you were such a fan of Obama. I just happen to be a history buff. If you care to do some research, you can find out for yourself how similar the actions of Obama follow those of Hitler. They are already attempting to find out who own guns and how many. I spoke with a guy a couple of days ago and he received something from the government asking about his weapons. If Obama and the democrats have their way they will systematically disarm this country, just as Hitler did in Germany. There was much more said about Bush than I have said about Obama. My problem is not just with Obama but most of those who are supposed to represent us in both parties. The democrats want to push socialism on this country. The current incumbents didn't start it, but they may just get it done. Socialism doesn't work in a free society. They cannot coexist. This group is about control. You don't have to take my word for it. Read a little history. And if you don't like Hitler then check out Lennon or Stalin. What you find just might scare you a bit, if you have an open mind.
 
  #115  
Old 09-20-2009, 06:50 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Since you embedded most of your post in my quote, I'll simply respond to the part you didn't. I'd also ask that in the future, you don't do so, as it makes responding all that much more difficult. Putting quote tags into a post before responding isn't tough. But when you embed your response in my post, when I hit the quote button, none of it even shows up.

Originally Posted by GMAN
I didn't realize that you were such a fan of Obama.


I'm not. In fact, I've been called a "Bushbot" too. But when push comes to shove, I am a fan of the Democratic Process, and whether I like him or not, he is MY President. When I see people making blatantly false statements against him, it makes my blood boil (just like it did under Bush). When those people are citizens of this country, it makes it that much worse. When those citizens are simply mouthpieces for the media and talk show personalities, it makes me lose faith in humanity.

I just happen to be a history buff.
No offense, but you're not very good at it. You'll see why in a short while.

If you care to do some research, you can find out for yourself how similar the actions of Obama follow those of Hitler.
Seriously - could you stop invoking Godwin's Law? It's getting old. Plus it's contradictory. You'll understand why when you read further on.

They are already attempting to find out who own guns and how many.
Prove it. Stop making these blanket allegations and actually back something up for once. You obviously have a computer, and I'm sure you can find Google. PROVE IT.

I spoke with a guy a couple of days ago and he received something from the government asking about his weapons.
I don't believe this for a second. I'm sure your friend has access to a scanner. Have him prove it.

If Obama and the democrats have their way they will systematically disarm this country, just as Hitler did in Germany.
Again, prove it.

There was much more said about Bush than I have said about Obama.
So that makes spreading lies about him OK.

My problem is not just with Obama but most of those who are supposed to represent us in both parties. The democrats want to push socialism on this country. The current incumbents didn't start it, but they may just get it done. Socialism doesn't work in a free society. They cannot coexist.
Ok, now you're talking about Socialism. Which is it? So far, you've likened him to a Fascist (Hitler), a Socialist, and Muslims, which most Muslim countries are Monarchies or Parliamentary Republics (like England). He can't be all these things. These type of governments don't coexist.

This group is about control. You don't have to take my word for it. Read a little history. And if you don't like Hitler then check out Lennon or Stalin. What you find just might scare you a bit, if you have an open mind.
If you can't discuss Obama without talking about Hitler, then you've already lost the argument. And I've checked out Lennon. He was great in the Beatles. Lenin, on the other hand, was a Marxist. You clearly don't know anything about these different types of government, because if you did, you would know that Fascism (Hitler) does not jive with Socialism, which does not jive with Marxism, which does not jive with a Monarchy or a Parliamentary Republic.

You're so hell bent on attaching labels to him, that you're attaching contradictory labels. So here's your free history lesson for today. Since you're a self-professed "history buff," you should find this quite interesting and informative. I'm being nice and including links too:

Fascism: Single party state, opposes class conflict (pitting various economic levels against each other, like Republicans and Democrats readily do), and blames liberal democracies (you know, like OBAMA?) for the creation of those conflicts and Communists (you know, like STALIN?) for exploiting them.

So Obama clearly can't be a Fascist like Hitler. It goes against everything the Democrat party stands for.

Source: Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Socialism: Not a political system, but rather an economic system. Socialists believe in direct ownership and control of resources by all, rather than ownership and control by a select few, including government. Commonly associated with the "working class." Lenin wrongly claimed that Socialism was a transition between Capitalism and Communism.

Since Obama clearly doesn't believe in direct ownership and control of all resources by the people, he can't be a Socialist either. Obama is commonly referred to as a Socialist because of his support of the working class.

Source: Socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marxism: Also known as Communism. Thrives on social conflicts, and believes such conflicts result in future technology and production for the society. Believes a select few should control and exploit the majority, unlike Socialism (meaning that each person gives more than they take).

Since Obama is in favor of extending benefits to those who do not give as much as they take, he clearly can't be a Marxist/Communist.

Source: Marxism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Parliamentary Republic/Monarchy: See Great Britain. I don't think we have to worry about King Obama anytime soon.:rofl:


So there you have it, GMAN. Your free history lesson for today, and prima facie evidence why Obama cannot be all the things you've attributed to him.

Now I challenge you to prove anything I've posted here wrong with legitimate evidence, rather than hearsay, conspiracies, and speculation. I know that your regular information sources normally don't provide you with much more than talking points (hence the fact that you're up in arms about czars, even though it's a term that Ronald Reagan coined for advisors, and have NEVER been subject to Congressional approval, as they have no powers whatsoever), so I'm actually challenging you to go out and find the information. I fully expect that you'll gloss over this all, and dismiss it immediately, so I'm begging you - prove me wrong. I'd delight in you producing legitimate proof to show that Obama is a Fascist/Socialist/Marxist/Monarch.
 
  #116  
Old 09-20-2009, 11:42 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

I challenge you to show me one thing that I have lied about with Obama. I have stated the truth and my opinion. You may not like what I have said. That is obvious when you revert to calling me names. One thing we can agree on is that he is our president. That is an unfortunate reality. And to balance things out, I am not sure that McCain would have been much better, but I don't think that he would have attempted to circumvent the constitution or congress with his appointee's. No president or elected representative should be above criticism. It is his behavior that I question. It is also his associations that I also question. Just because you don't like what I say doesn't mean that you need to lower yourself to name calling. That is the liberal way. You have no basis for your statements so you call those who disagree with you names. Well, fire away. Whether you disagree or not, all you need do is look at history and you will see parallels to what is going on. On the other hand, you could just stick your head in the sand and pretend that none of this is true and everything is right with the world.
 
  #117  
Old 09-21-2009, 12:48 AM
dobry4u's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,274
Default

Let's try this


Universal Heath Care----- the US is about the only developed country not to implement it. Universal Heath care is based on secular humanism period.

Global Economic Stimulus----- Germany, France, China, Japan... the list is endless, are working on their countries economic stimulus.... Ideally based on economic theory period.

Public Welfare----- it ain't new. You CANNOT blame society for its embrace because of one or even a couple elements (government, race, religion).

I am an American who supports her President who was elected by the People. Period. I support my country and her efforts to be a great Nation of People of the World. Period.

If you don't like the way the government is handling things, offer rational and supported correspondence to those who represent you. I don't think grasping at butt burps in the wind to take a soapbox stand will really, truly support any claims or bring closer a resolution.
 
__________________
  #118  
Old 09-21-2009, 01:47 AM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
I fully expect that you'll gloss over this all, and dismiss it immediately,
I couldn't have called that any better if I had a crystal ball.

Originally Posted by GMAN
I challenge you to show me one thing that I have lied about with Obama.
1. That he's a Muslim. You've provided no proof whatsoever to back this up, and eventually backpeddled to "Maybe he was talking about his father or his heritage."

2. Muslims want to overthrow our government. No they don't. Wacko terrorists want to overthrow our government.

3. Obama is helping them do it. You now claim you never said this, but it appears on page 4:

Originally Posted by GMAN
I also think that the Muslims want to over throw this government or bring this country to it's knees. Obama is doing a great job for them. They should be proud of the job their fellow Muslim brother is doing for them in bringing down the "Great Satan" (America).
http://www.classadrivers.com/forum/a...tml#post462775

4. A Muslim terrorist is the same as a Muslim. You denied this one as well, but that appears on Page 5:

Originally Posted by GMAN
It wasn't a loving people who attacked this country on 9/11. It was people who said that they were Muslims. The Muslims have sworn to kill Americans and anyone who stands in their way to force the world into believing the way that they do.
http://www.classadrivers.com/forum/a...tml#post462842

5. The President is trying to destroy the country. Your reasoning for this appears on Page 12:

Originally Posted by GMAN
Everything this president has done since he assumed office goes against everything this country stands for. He has taken over the U.S. auto industry, banking and insurance industries, or at least a large portion of them. That is socialism, not capitalism.
As my prior post shows, that isn't the definition of Socialism at all. In fact, it is quite the opposite of Socialism.

6. The President's advisors are unconstitutionally receiving power without the authorization of congress. Yet another wild claim with no proof whatsoever to back it up.

7. The President is like Hitler/Stalin/Lenin/Lennon, etc. Please see my prior post that clearly shows he can't be all of these things.

8. "Freedom of Religion" appears in the Constitution. Once again you play the "I don't recall ever saying this" card. This time it's on Page 7.

Originally Posted by GMAN
Our forefathers put "Freedom of Religion" in our constitution.
http://www.classadrivers.com/forum/a...tml#post462886

9. Islam is being taught in public schools. I had to dig to find the sources on this one, and not surprisingly, they were all from far right fringe websites who believe that Muslim (an ethnic group) and Islam (a religion) are one in the same. Muslim culture was most certainly being taught in our schools, and for good reason. In fact, the only reference I could find that actually made a real allegation of Islam being taught in a public school was a Minneapolis charter school that was receiving public funds and was accused of teaching Islam. The name of the school? Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy. Which just so happened to be run by an Islamic charity, and they deny the allegation, saying they are careful to follow State guidelines.

10. Obama was not born in the US. Even you are now claiming that "well i didn't see the birth certificate." Well just for you, here is the super secret birth certificate that took me all of about 15 seconds to find:

FactCheck.org: Born in the U.S.A.


I have stated the truth and my opinion. You may not like what I have said. That is obvious when you revert to calling me names.
Calling you bigoted is not calling you names. It's expressing my opinion, and I've backed it up with facts. I stand by that opinion.

One thing we can agree on is that he is our president. That is an unfortunate reality. And to balance things out, I am not sure that McCain would have been much better, but I don't think that he would have attempted to circumvent the constitution or congress with his appointee's.
Obama hasn't done so. GWB's advisors were not subject to Congressional approval, so why should Obama be held to a different standard?

Just because you don't like what I say doesn't mean that you need to lower yourself to name calling. That is the liberal way.
Now THAT is name calling.

You have no basis for your statements so you call those who disagree with you names. Well, fire away. Whether you disagree or not, all you need do is look at history and you will see parallels to what is going on. On the other hand, you could just stick your head in the sand and pretend that none of this is true and everything is right with the world.
Yeah, or you can believe nutjob rightwing news sources who want you to hate our President, and will use ridiculous reasons to try to make you do it.

Now I've proven my case, and you have yet to provide a single shred of evidence to support any of yours. I issued a challenge to you in my prior post to prove me wrong. You glossed over it and issued a challenge of your own to prove you wrong. I did. Now I expect you'll provide the same courtesy to me.

 
  #119  
Old 09-21-2009, 01:52 AM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by dobry4u
I am an American who supports her President who was elected by the People. Period. I support my country and her efforts to be a great Nation of People of the World. Period.
Ok, now I have to take issue with you. Our country clearly has a penis.:rofl:

If you don't like the way the government is handling things, offer rational and supported correspondence to those who represent you. I don't think grasping at butt burps in the wind to take a soapbox stand will really, truly support any claims or bring closer a resolution.
What amazes me is that everything the right complained about in regards to GWB, they are now engaged in. And their reasoning is, "well they did it first." That is the most juvenile answer I've ever heard. What's next? "MOM!!!! He put his hand on my side of the seat!!!!"

It is because of grown adults resorting to tactics of a 6 year old that I've lost faith in the Republican party, and no longer consider myself one. I know for a fact I'm not the only one. I now consider my political views, like my religion, to be Agnostic - meaning there may be a difference between the two parties, but I have yet to see it.
 
  #120  
Old 09-21-2009, 02:24 AM
Orangetxguy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,792
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Since you embedded most of your post in my quote, I'll simply respond to the part you didn't. I'd also ask that in the future, you don't do so, as it makes responding all that much more difficult. Putting quote tags into a post before responding isn't tough. But when you embed your response in my post, when I hit the quote button, none of it even shows up.



I'm not. In fact, I've been called a "Bushbot" too. But when push comes to shove, I am a fan of the Democratic Process, and whether I like him or not, he is MY President. When I see people making blatantly false statements against him, it makes my blood boil (just like it did under Bush). When those people are citizens of this country, it makes it that much worse. When those citizens are simply mouthpieces for the media and talk show personalities, it makes me lose faith in humanity.



No offense, but you're not very good at it. You'll see why in a short while.



Seriously - could you stop invoking Godwin's Law? It's getting old. Plus it's contradictory. You'll understand why when you read further on.



Prove it. Stop making these blanket allegations and actually back something up for once. You obviously have a computer, and I'm sure you can find Google. PROVE IT.



I don't believe this for a second. I'm sure your friend has access to a scanner. Have him prove it.



Again, prove it.



So that makes spreading lies about him OK.



Ok, now you're talking about Socialism. Which is it? So far, you've likened him to a Fascist (Hitler), a Socialist, and Muslims, which most Muslim countries are Monarchies or Parliamentary Republics (like England). He can't be all these things. These type of governments don't coexist.



If you can't discuss Obama without talking about Hitler, then you've already lost the argument. And I've checked out Lennon. He was great in the Beatles. Lenin, on the other hand, was a Marxist. You clearly don't know anything about these different types of government, because if you did, you would know that Fascism (Hitler) does not jive with Socialism, which does not jive with Marxism, which does not jive with a Monarchy or a Parliamentary Republic.

You're so hell bent on attaching labels to him, that you're attaching contradictory labels. So here's your free history lesson for today. Since you're a self-professed "history buff," you should find this quite interesting and informative. I'm being nice and including links too:

Fascism: Single party state, opposes class conflict (pitting various economic levels against each other, like Republicans and Democrats readily do), and blames liberal democracies (you know, like OBAMA?) for the creation of those conflicts and Communists (you know, like STALIN?) for exploiting them.

So Obama clearly can't be a Fascist like Hitler. It goes against everything the Democrat party stands for.

Source: Fascism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Socialism: Not a political system, but rather an economic system. Socialists believe in direct ownership and control of resources by all, rather than ownership and control by a select few, including government. Commonly associated with the "working class." Lenin wrongly claimed that Socialism was a transition between Capitalism and Communism.

Since Obama clearly doesn't believe in direct ownership and control of all resources by the people, he can't be a Socialist either. Obama is commonly referred to as a Socialist because of his support of the working class.

Source: Socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marxism: Also known as Communism. Thrives on social conflicts, and believes such conflicts result in future technology and production for the society. Believes a select few should control and exploit the majority, unlike Socialism (meaning that each person gives more than they take).

Since Obama is in favor of extending benefits to those who do not give as much as they take, he clearly can't be a Marxist/Communist.

Source: Marxism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Parliamentary Republic/Monarchy: See Great Britain. I don't think we have to worry about King Obama anytime soon.:rofl:


So there you have it, GMAN. Your free history lesson for today, and prima facie evidence why Obama cannot be all the things you've attributed to him.

Now I challenge you to prove anything I've posted here wrong with legitimate evidence, rather than hearsay, conspiracies, and speculation. I know that your regular information sources normally don't provide you with much more than talking points (hence the fact that you're up in arms about czars, even though it's a term that Ronald Reagan coined for advisors, and have NEVER been subject to Congressional approval, as they have no powers whatsoever), so I'm actually challenging you to go out and find the information. I fully expect that you'll gloss over this all, and dismiss it immediately, so I'm begging you - prove me wrong. I'd delight in you producing legitimate proof to show that Obama is a Fascist/Socialist/Marxist/Monarch.
:eek2: :eek2: Careful Rev!!

Glen Beck, Shaun Hannity and Bill O`Reilly, will all take you off their mailing lists!!!


:lol:









continue with the arguing now. :ranting: :ranting: :ranting: :ranting:
 
__________________
Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! :thumbsup: Star Trek2009

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 01:18 AM.

Top