User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 11-22-2006, 03:19 AM
ken_o's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

hwyfly stay away from wh i almost forgot that they were on the same group of carriers petioning for mandated speed governors on all trucks.

hey yoop iv heard of a few companies fining their drivers for various reasons.
what other carriers engages in these practices?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-22-2006, 03:29 AM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken_o
hwyfly stay away from wh i almost forgot that they were on the same group of carriers petioning for mandated speed governors on all trucks.

hey yoop iv heard of a few companies fining their drivers for various reasons.
what other carriers engages in these practices?
Lots of em
Most won't fire people unless it becomes a Pattern
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-22-2006, 04:26 AM
ken_o's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

im trying to understand their logic. lets fine the driver for violating hos or forget to check this box etcc.. for the load we dispcthed said driver on.
since when did the fmcsa give carriers the legal authority to impose such fines.
I guess its a surpise at orientation. driver gets fined and the amount of such deducted from their check, ths is a catch 22 for drivers. their line of thinking is the drivers not going to say anything he or she violated hos.
they can make revenue to make that bonus check for the safty dept that much nicer, absolutely wonderful no end to this insanity.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-22-2006, 04:40 AM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken_o
im trying to understand their logic. lets fine the driver for violating hos or forget to check this box etcc.. for the load we dispcthed said driver on.
since when did the fmcsa give carriers the legal authority to impose such fines.
I guess its a surpise at orientation. driver gets fined and the amount of such deducted from their check, ths is a catch 22 for drivers. their line of thinking is the drivers not going to say anything he or she violated hos.
they can make revenue to make that bonus check for the safty dept that much nicer, absolutely wonderful no end to this insanity.
I'm agreeing with you BUT I'm not buying that WH fines their drivers.
I can see them firing a person for Habitual log book violations but most companies will give a Driver a "Refresher" on how to do a log book first.
If they are doing that, which I still doubt, it's a bit above and beyond anything I've ever heard or seen.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-22-2006, 04:51 AM
ken_o's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

iv heard of $50. fines at some carriers but couldn't remember their names.
only to really find out is to go to orientation and i just don't wanna find out that bad.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-22-2006, 04:57 PM
Hwyfly's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mankato, Mn.
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

OK! WH Transportation is out.

What are my best bets as a new driver from Minneapolis. I have been searching for a long time for the right company to start with!

I have a clean driving record, and background.

Any ideas? Thanks!
__________________
Hwyfly
--------
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-22-2006, 11:59 PM
ken_o's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

i would say start with roehl stay a year and go elsewhere.
they have a yard right near minneapolis and marshfield is only a few hours away . good luck hwyfly
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-23-2006, 02:27 AM
Hwyfly's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mankato, Mn.
Posts: 53
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Thanks, ken_o
__________________
Hwyfly
--------
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-23-2006, 04:19 AM
Keystone's Avatar
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Yoopr...it really does not matter to me if you "buy" the 100.00 fine that WH imposes on upon their drivers for log book violations or not. You mentioned that you see their trucks from time to time, ask one of the drivers, ask to see their 1 1/2" thick drivers/company manual as well.

Oh and by the way and for the record...WH did "NOT" kick me out or fire me from orientation. I left orientation by my own free will and expense.

If you would have taken the time to check the link, that I had enclosed in my original reply, you would have read about the problems that I incurred while there at orientation. You would have also read about a few of WH's policies that I felt were unjust.

I have no axes to grind, nor do I gain anything in anyway, by stating what I have stated here at this or any message board.

My sole purpose of this or any post for that matter, is to provide the truth. Truthful, factual information with hopes that it will help out a fellow driver or individual from having to learn the hard way as I did, which I believe to be the purpose of this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-23-2006, 04:40 AM
ken_o's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 666
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

relax keystone he doesnt agree with companies fining drivers i do believe
the amount of such is what is in question when and if the fines r imposed i think we can all agree this is a practice that schould not be engaged in except for goverment agencys dot police judges etcc..
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.