I may be sorry I ask this, but...
#31
10-25-2008, 11:54 AM
:thumbsup: Maryland KW... I agree, tit for tat, and I felt your frustration, not anger or worse.
:clap:I don't mind Canadians or Mexicans voicing their opinions on our politics, as they are our next door neighbors, and I think their opinions should be heard. They don't get to vote, but I welcome their input 100%. Bottom line is, we are all North Americans, with a lot of common interest. Canada and Mexico sure has a lot of fine look'n wimmin. :bow: ...okay...that's my "c' mon baby" interest.  Thing I have to wonder about is how much of what either party stumps, will ever actually be put into law? Hopefully, in my opinion, much of this is just to get an election, and once a party gains the administration, they can go back to being incompetent idiots...and really accomplish nothing, except agree on giving themselves raises and vacations. Whatever Obama or McCain talk about now, would still have to have some bipartisanship in order to become a successful Bill. What I do fear is one party having control over the Presidency, and both Houses of Congress. We saw what happened in the early years of the Bush Administration, when they had this much power. Now with the Democrats about to gain control, I think our Country is really going to end up worse off than we are now...because all I ever see is bigger government, and more corruption. I am equally disgusted with both parties! That underlines my personal overall view and opinion. Both parties suck! But right now, at this point in time with the current events, I believe Obama would be the worse of two idiots heading the list of idiots. It's not so much him in particular, but the party as a whole, and how much they have as potential to "change" and in effect screw us up even more....or lets say...faster. I'm sure the McCain administration would screw us too...just slower, as he can veto every stupid porkfat Bill loaded down with earmarks, that comes up as some special interest windfall...and send it back to be argued for years, going nowhere. I'm proud to say, I am a Schwing voter. :banana3:...I'm voting for boobage. I may as well enjoy our VP in a tight sweater shooting a Caribou from a helicopter. Have you noticed...firing a gun makes her nipples hard. :block: "C'mon baby!" 
#32
10-25-2008, 12:25 PM
__________________
Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! :thumbsup: Star Trek2009
#33
10-26-2008, 01:00 AM
Socialists like Obama like for the wealth to be redistributed as long as it isn't their wealth. I find it amusing when they discuss their income taxes that they give so little to charity. Yet they want everyone else to give their money to help those in need. They want the government to help the needy but cannot be bothered to share some of their own wealth.
#34
10-26-2008, 02:35 AM
Seems, this election, more so than any other I can ever remember, if there's an "unflattering comment" about the Democratic candidate, the supporters come out of the woodwork, fangs bared, and venom dripping.
There's something else I find to be VERY INTERESTING... The Republicans have "THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE", where if you donate $100,000 to the Republican Party, you get to sit in on the PLATFORM COMMITTEE. But, the Democrats, "THE POOR-MAN'S PARTY, wants $200,000 for the same priviledge. Does this make sense? Or is this some kind of "POLITICAL OXYMORON? Obama raised $700 million for his campaign. If he's so much for "SPREADING THE WEALTH", why isn't he using part of that to give the American Worker the MUCH NEEDED BAIL-OUT" that the American Worker needs??? It just seems very strange to me that the "POOR-MAN'S PARTY" wants wealthier people sitting in on their platform committee then the Rich-man's Party. (Of course, that was a few years ago, it may have gone up since then.) It would make a lot more sense if it was the other way around. |
