Until drivers factor the cost of fuel in running the truck, companies will take action like cutting the speed back. Driver pay and fuel are the highest costs. It's either cut the truck and save some money in fuel or cut the driver pay.
Now.. I have been running around 60-62 mph for over a decade even though most of my tractors would run 75 mph. I have averaged over 135K miles a year, never been late on a p/u or delivery. I have also averaged 6.8 - 7 mpg in that time. I have, to date, 142K dispatched miles this year. That is with taking 3 weeks off for vacation.
The reason miles are lacking for most drivers is NOT because the truck is choked to 60-65. It is because the planning personnel at the company are not booking the loads and scheduling them right. Some drivers are at fault for not communicating availability or hours they will have at the other end. I make a concerted effort to let my travel agent know when I will be somewhere, how many hours available, etc LONG before I get done with a run. Fortunately, my travel agent knows how I work and knows that she can count on me to be where I need to be. She then has me preplanned most of the time for the next run. That is why I consistently run around 3K miles a week and am home on the weekends.
After a LOT of years doing this, I can spot a lousy planning staff a mile away. That is one of the reasons I left CFI in '99 after 7 years with them. I see the same problem with a lot of carriers. At least the larger ones. Where I have found the best planning/operations personnel is with the smaller, regional carriers. I will never work for a large national carrier again if I can help it. That two or more weeks out crap is just that... crap. It shows that the carrier will make the driver suffer for a poor operations staff that can't plan their way out of the bathroom.
Before you criticize the carriers for choking the trucks back too soon, consider what you would do if YOU were paying for the fuel. I know. I gave myself a $10K a year net pay increase by improving my mpg by just 1 mpg at the current fuel prices. Now if the carriers would just kick back a lot of that savings towards their drivers, they would have no one complaining and no need to choke the trucks back since the drivers would do what it takes to get good fuel mileage. Since the carriers will not share the savings, there is no incentive for drivers to manage the mpg's better. The only way a person can see the gain is to get their own truck.
|