Who will

Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 12-08-2007, 02:18 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: I94 Exit 69
Posts: 358
Default Re: Who will work with a drug charge

I was under the impression that anyone born after WWII experimented with drugs. Kids are getting exposed to drugs increasingly early in life. What I did (I mean I heard about others doing) in college is now literally childs play.

I would be wary of anyone who claimed they never took any drugs and have an iron fist on those that have. This type of person either has a problem with truth, or is a Kaczynskiesque social recluse/sociopath.

Zealots and the unforgiving are generally fighting internal demons. Here are a few examples.

Jimmy Swaggert - Fire and Brimstone Preacher. Got outed by a REALLY SKANKY hooker. UGH, I remember the Penthouse shots -EWWWW :?

Larry Craig - 20-years ago claimed he wasn't a homo. This was before anyone even asked him if he was queer. Been fighting against queers ever since. He got busted soliciting homo sex in the Men's Room at the Minneapolis Airport.

Jim Bakker - Another preacher saving us from sin and the evils of the flesh. He got to bang Jessica Hahn, not bad considering his wife looked hideous. She divorced him and he lost the amusement park. Probably was worth it.

Ted Haggard - another "Family Values" Old Testament preacher. Got busted by his homo prostitute. A closet queer with a head full of meth. Lets all give a big Hallelujah!

The list goes on and on.

Feederfred could be having flashbacks and thinking he is God. Perhaps he's an oxy freak experimenting with gerbils. Maybe his wife is a crackhead and rifled his 401K. It's hard to say from here. But a little scratching around his noggin will definitely show all is not well.

FWIW, we have had a coke head alcohlic with his finger on the button for the last 7-years. That is a far bigger problem than someone being in the wrong place at wrong time with the wrong stuff :wink:

Best of luck.


Originally Posted by feederfred
Originally Posted by Mack 10
Who will hire a recent grad with an possion charge thats atleast 3yrs old?
"I take my driving "seriously now" .....Oh RIGHT...Until the NEXT opportunity to get high presents itself...BTW, learn how to spell. Unlike some of the posters, I don't make apologies. Sure, I've made mistakes, however NONE involving DRUGS and breaking the law and then whined about "why won't anyone trust me with an 80,000lb vehicle" ? Heres the facts: YOU ARE NOT NEEDED OR WANTED on America's highways. You WILL use drugs AGAIN. Statistics bear this out. You are a RISK, pure and simple and I do not apologize for my views. If you were asking for advice on becoming a "baker" for example, no-one would have a problem. Instead you ask us (the motoring public at large) to "trust you"...Sorry, I don't..However, all you druggies just see yourselves as societies "victims" and want us to feel sorry for you. Too bad, I don't. Flame me, I could give a rats ass..."whaaa-"I don't use drugs-I'm not going into detail blahblahblah" Any excuse in a storm ? You still haven't taken responsibility for your actions and you never will. Facts are they don't charge/convict you for POSSESSION unless you have them on you. Save that BS for someone else...
 
  #22  
Old 12-09-2007, 01:53 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 229
Default

everyone here is right if you were convicted of a drug charge there is no need for you to be driving. hmm think about it even if you are involved in a minor traffic accident that conviction will be used against you and the company and the only way that might not be able to be used against you is if you can prove that you went through and sucessfully completed drug rehab and have shown that you are not using anymore. if i were in charge of hiring and someone had a drug conviction id throw that application right in the trash i dont need my company to have to worry about that person having an accident
 
  #23  
Old 12-09-2007, 04:55 AM
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 123
Default

Good Luck on staying sober Mack 10! Too bad only crappy companies will hire you for being a former druggie. Hope you enjoy working for under 30 cpm and not having a life. Was the high worth it???

It's always the cops who made stuff up. Funny how every one of you little druggies claim that same line of poop. Even if it's two cops against you I believe you would've tried fighting your good name really hard if you weren't innocent of what they've convicted you with. See ya loser.
 
  #24  
Old 12-09-2007, 05:17 AM
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 39
Default

mbadriver wrote: A big load of :dung:

What an A$$.
 
  #25  
Old 12-09-2007, 06:23 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: pod# 110 -Shared with a high risk in a red jumper.
Posts: 2,240
Default

Originally Posted by rvrjr7
everyone here is right if you were convicted of a drug charge there is no need for you to be driving. hmm think about it even if you are involved in a minor traffic accident that conviction will be used against you and the company and the only way that might not be able to be used against you is if you can prove that you went through and sucessfully completed drug rehab and have shown that you are not using anymore. if i were in charge of hiring and someone had a drug conviction id throw that application right in the trash i dont need my company to have to worry about that person having an accident

That's the most ridiculous stuff I've heard ...Because he had a past drug charge if he's involved in an accident a lawyer can use it iin a law suit against the company...No they can't ,because after an accident in a CMV Drug testing would be done not just by the company ,but when the paramedics respond blood samples will be drawn...So nothing in court will be sucessfull regarding his past use ...unless he is currently using and show positive on the drug test given after the accident.
 
  #26  
Old 12-09-2007, 06:51 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: pod# 110 -Shared with a high risk in a red jumper.
Posts: 2,240
Default

Originally Posted by CB JR.
Good Luck on staying sober Mack 10! Too bad only crappy companies will hire you for being a former druggie. Hope you enjoy working for under 30 cpm and not having a life. Was the high worth it???

It's always the cops who made stuff up. Funny how every one of you little druggies claim that same line of poop. Even if it's two cops against you I believe you would've tried fighting your good name really hard if you weren't innocent of what they've convicted you with. See ya loser.


Some cops do tend to "Embelish" the truth a bit in some cases ...For example back in june of 2006 I had sit on a jury the case was drug posession, Manufacture,distribution...Of Marajuana


The cops had found less than 1/2 oz in a zip lock baggie next to a smoking pipe ...They sent this small quantity to the lab for testing only 30% of the substance tested to be illicit ...Ok that evidence proves him guilty of personal use/posession charges of 1 oz or less...smalll time charge...Well this was not sweet enough for cops , so they kept flashing pictures of 3 large trash bags full of what they would only call a "leafy green substance" ....Now keep in mind they sent the small zip lock baggy out for testing and freely called the substance illicit Marajuana , but for some reason did not feel the need to send this bag of "leafy green substance" out for testing , and never called it illicit...During the entire trial the officers kept eluding to this substance being Marajuana , but kept dodging the question of why it was not tested ...Then the man had som lighting that could be used to grow anything plant related illegal or legal , But the officers had no evidence he did anything illicit with the lighting , And because they only had less than a 1/2 ounce of Marajuana in zip lock baggy with a pipe , but wanted charges of manufacture/distribution they kept pointing out the potential use of the lighting to grow Marajuana plants...and this "leafy green substance"... Despite having no Marahuana plants present on the mans property ,and a bag full of hedge clippings ...


I personally sat on this jury watching the officers attempt to manufacture evidence from nothing to convict a man for Manufacture of Marajuana with no more eveidence than a bag of hedge clippings and lighting , And small zip lock baggy of pot and a smokers pipe ...Don't tell me cops are above fudging the truth in their favor .
 
  #27  
Old 12-10-2007, 12:39 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: I94 Exit 69
Posts: 358
Default

Cops, crooks, and drug dealers are all cut from the same cloth.

Look at Bernie Kerik - Top Cop of NYC was in line to get appointed Director of Homeland Security. Turns out to be a mean spirited crook.

Cops and Robbers. Robbers and Cops. What's the difference.

It is ludicrous to penalize a guy for life for a mistake. For Christ's Sake lets save the judicial system and prisons for those that really need incarcirated and punished.

It's not a big deal. You may get underpaid and overworked for a year or so.

There are a lot self-righteous, judgemental simpletons that are belittling you. Enjoy the fact that in a year or so your wages will be on equal footing. Also don't worry about Canada. For a few hundreds bucks they will deem you rehabilitated. It's all about the money :wink:



Originally Posted by BIG JEEP on 44's
Originally Posted by CB JR.
Good Luck on staying sober Mack 10! Too bad only crappy companies will hire you for being a former druggie. Hope you enjoy working for under 30 cpm and not having a life. Was the high worth it???

It's always the cops who made stuff up. Funny how every one of you little druggies claim that same line of poop. Even if it's two cops against you I believe you would've tried fighting your good name really hard if you weren't innocent of what they've convicted you with. See ya loser.


Some cops do tend to "Embelish" the truth a bit in some cases ...For example back in june of 2006 I had sit on a jury the case was drug posession, Manufacture,distribution...Of Marajuana


The cops had found less than 1/2 oz in a zip lock baggie next to a smoking pipe ...They sent this small quantity to the lab for testing only 30% of the substance tested to be illicit ...Ok that evidence proves him guilty of personal use/posession charges of 1 oz or less...smalll time charge...Well this was not sweet enough for cops , so they kept flashing pictures of 3 large trash bags full of what they would only call a "leafy green substance" ....Now keep in mind they sent the small zip lock baggy out for testing and freely called the substance illicit Marajuana , but for some reason did not feel the need to send this bag of "leafy green substance" out for testing , and never called it illicit...During the entire trial the officers kept eluding to this substance being Marajuana , but kept dodging the question of why it was not tested ...Then the man had som lighting that could be used to grow anything plant related illegal or legal , But the officers had no evidence he did anything illicit with the lighting , And because they only had less than a 1/2 ounce of Marajuana in zip lock baggy with a pipe , but wanted charges of manufacture/distribution they kept pointing out the potential use of the lighting to grow Marajuana plants...and this "leafy green substance"... Despite having no Marahuana plants present on the mans property ,and a bag full of hedge clippings ...


I personally sat on this jury watching the officers attempt to manufacture evidence from nothing to convict a man for Manufacture of Marajuana with no more eveidence than a bag of hedge clippings and lighting , And small zip lock baggy of pot and a smokers pipe ...Don't tell me cops are above fudging the truth in their favor .
 
  #28  
Old 12-10-2007, 12:41 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: I94 Exit 69
Posts: 358
Default

Your last lonely brain cell must have worked overtime to come up with that brilliant response.

Originally Posted by OKtrucker
mbadriver wrote: A big load of :dung:

What an A$$.
 
  #29  
Old 01-06-2008, 03:54 AM
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 29
Default Re: Who will work with a drug charge

[. Facts are they don't charge/convict you for POSSESSION unless you have them on you. Save that BS for someone else...[/quote][/quote]
 
  #30  
Old 01-06-2008, 03:55 AM
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 29
Default Re: Who will work with a drug charge

. Give the guy a break, he's trying to better himself.[/quote]
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Top