company violates FMCS 49CFR393.203
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Menasha, WI
Posts: 2
if a company violates FMCS 49CFR393.203 parts and accessories necessary for safe operation by not replacing a jammed driver door preventing entry/exit then the operator/driver is later involved in a backing incident/accident who is at fault?
This occurred while i was training with the trainer sitting in the second seat. He told me i was crooked and he stood up and moved to the sleeper berth area and as he did that i hit the parked tanker next to me. this happened in a truck stop and was non reportable DOT; no citations issued. damage was approx. $2000.00 Should the company be sited for violating FMCS 49CFR393.203 and take responsibility for this incident or am I still at fault?
#2
Who was the one doing the back?
How does the door problem fit into the problem with the back?
__________________
![]() Branch Manager at Logistic Dynamics http://dennisetheridgefreightrate.wordpress.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dennis-etheridge/53/110/a49
#3
Originally Posted by icedtea58
if a company violates FMCS 49CFR393.203 parts and accessories necessary for safe operation by not replacing a jammed driver door preventing entry/exit then the operator/driver is later involved in a backing incident/accident who is at fault?
This occurred while i was training with the trainer sitting in the second seat. He told me i was crooked and he stood up and moved to the sleeper berth area and as he did that i hit the parked tanker next to me. this happened in a truck stop and was non reportable DOT; no citations issued. damage was approx. $2000.00 Should the company be sited for violating FMCS 49CFR393.203 and take responsibility for this incident or am I still at fault? basically if you choose to operated the vehicle you are saying that it is fit to operate. even if your trainer or someone is guiding you into the spot and you hit something YOU are still at fault.
__________________
work harder, millions on welfare are counting on you !
#4
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Mud is totally correct on this.
The person behind the wheel is ultimately responsible for everything. Sure the owner of the truck may have violated a regulation, however, as the old saying goes. Two wrongs do not make it right.
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours.
#5
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tennesse
Posts: 738
i agree with utrun and mud, you were the one behind the wheel and you hit something it's your fault. yes they should have fixed the door. but you and your trainer both knew it was not working so you could have been cited for defective equipment...
#6
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Menasha, WI
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by got mud?
Originally Posted by icedtea58
if a company violates FMCS 49CFR393.203 parts and accessories necessary for safe operation by not replacing a jammed driver door preventing entry/exit then the operator/driver is later involved in a backing incident/accident who is at fault?
This occurred while i was training with the trainer sitting in the second seat. He told me i was crooked and he stood up and moved to the sleeper berth area and as he did that i hit the parked tanker next to me. this happened in a truck stop and was non reportable DOT; no citations issued. damage was approx. $2000.00 Should the company be sited for violating FMCS 49CFR393.203 and take responsibility for this incident or am I still at fault? basically if you choose to operated the vehicle you are saying that it is fit to operate. even if your trainer or someone is guiding you into the spot and you hit something YOU are still at fault.
#7
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redneckistan
Posts: 2,831
I must be missing something.. where in the FMCSR makes backing into something either a door or a company's fault? You backed into something and the trainer was not where he should have been. Be honest and just accept the fact and learn from this. I hope you didn't mention this regulation to the company already and try to blame them for your mistake. This half baked accusation is not the way to be seen as anything but a danger to the company.
__________________
http://agoldstardad.wordpress.com/
#9
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,513
Being that you were the trainee--second seat driver--- It looks bad on your Trainer that HE allowed/continued to operate a vehicle in violation of safety regulations.... I would hope that you repeatedly noted the defect on YOUR log book each and every day.
Also, as your trainer--- his truck--- your company should disqualify him- assign safety points against HIM. Trainers are not suppose to "give the trainee enough rope to hang themselves" but you were ultimately responsible-- if you were driving a pete 379 and needed to open the door to change the angle of the mirror but couldn't- and couldn't climb out the driver side door to G.O.A.L.-- again-- it's your fault.
#10
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Well folks, just because the drivers side door would not open it did not stop him from doing a G.O.A.L.
The passenger door worked. Yes, it is a pain to climb over and out, but it can be done. Been there done that and got the t-shirt and all that myself.
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours. |


