9400i vs T600
#11
Originally Posted by GMAN
Congratulations on your purchase, rgordon. I hope you have as good service out of yours as I have out of mine. I have over 900,000 miles and still trucking. I have had to spend a little money along the way, but it is still cheaper than making payments. It is still strong.
__________________
1999 Freightshaker FLD120.... my 1st baby 2005 Pete Low and Mean 2005 9400i Cheap and making money
#12
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Originally Posted by rgordon212
Originally Posted by GMAN
Congratulations on your purchase, rgordon. I hope you have as good service out of yours as I have out of mine. I have over 900,000 miles and still trucking. I have had to spend a little money along the way, but it is still cheaper than making payments. It is still strong.
Let's talk wind turbine blades....are they power only moves?
#13
Originally Posted by enobeenob
Go with KW, they hold their value better and are not as cheaply made on the inside.
A Inter-trashional is a poor man's Freightshaker. International being a "poor man's Freightliner"? Have you ever driven many Internationals? I used Internationals in over 6 years of driving year round in Alaska. The Freightliners didn't even come close to endurance and quality in that environment. I will put up my 2006 Internationnal 9400i against all but the best spec'd out Freightliners. I have been in a lot of Freightliners over the years from FLD, Century, and Columbias. No contest. My 9400 wins hands down. Quieter, smoother riding, easier to work on, etc. I have gotten some of the best fuel mileage numbers out of Internationals. I know that there are many factors involved, but none the less, the numbers are there. I am presently averaging approx 7.2 mpg out of my 9400i, ISX, 13 spd, 3.42 rears. But... I like that so many view the Internationals in a negative light. It makes the costs stay down so that I can continue to buy a good quality truck at a relatively good price and get the best return on investment. So, lets here it everyone! Internationals suck rocks and are trash trucks meant for O/O wannabes! Who would want a 13 letter manure spreader?
__________________
Freedom does not mean the choice to do whatever you want. It means the choice to do what you ought.
#14
Paccar has tried to sell that idea for many years, and to a great success. I don't have a problem with KW. I like them. The problem I have with them is that they are over priced. I have looked at original purchase price and resale and you do get more on the selling end, but you pay a hefty price when you buy it in the beginning. I just don't think the resale price warrants what you have to pay initially. Some people don't seem to mind paying the higher price. I am sure Paccar loves you for that. I am just not much caught up in specific brands. I have my preferences, but I look more toward value. I see more value in something such as International where you can get into the brand for less money than KW and have more room. I am talking about the T600. The sleepers are pretty much identical with the T600 and W900. The prosleeper is much better laid out than the aerodyne. It has much more usable space. |

