User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-25-2006, 12:00 AM
Georgia Hot Dogg's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 84
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default about to purchase reefer

I won't to get a few opinions...about to purchase a reefer trailer and want to know the best size to go with: 53ft or 48? Many drivers have said a 48 would be fine and that alot of shippers don't use the full 53 trailer space anyway Anyone own a reefer that could give advice...would be appreciated
__________________
driving my life away
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2006, 01:40 AM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Just remember if you're hauling Frozen normally they only load it to the 48' Mark anyway.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2006, 02:23 AM
PackRatTDI's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default Re: about to purchase reefer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Hot Dogg
I won't to get a few opinions...about to purchase a reefer trailer and want to know the best size to go with: 53ft or 48? Many drivers have said a 48 would be fine and that alot of shippers don't use the full 53 trailer space anyway Anyone own a reefer that could give advice...would be appreciated
I think the only reason to opt for a 53' trailer is if you know you'll be dealing frequently with shippers that demand 53' trailers.
__________________
You can take the driver out of the truck but you cant take the truck out of the driver.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2006, 02:28 AM
emerlin's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 181
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

He said Reefer! Huhuhuhuhu!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2006, 02:31 AM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emerlin
He said Reefer! Huhuhuhuhu!
Yeah-And??
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2006, 06:21 AM
Guest
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by emerlin
He said Reefer! Huhuhuhuhu!
LOL....I grew up in the 70's
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-25-2006, 02:49 PM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

that's nice-the Topic was on whether he should get a 53 or 48'
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-25-2006, 03:30 PM
BanditsCousin's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I'd go 53ft if the price isn't signifigantly more. Per chance you are in a slow spot and can find dry van freight freight, but no temperature-controlled loads, the 5 ft could make the difference between the load or sitting.

In essence, though, a 48' should be fine, as I see more 48' reefers than vans in OTR.
__________________
Mud, sweat, and gears
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2006, 03:36 PM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Even with Dry Freight they still usually load back to the 48' Mark.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2006, 03:39 PM
BanditsCousin's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

True, but better caught with a lil extra room than a few feet "not enough" :lol: If I had to be deep in cities though for a great majority of my loads, the 48 might have an advantage. For regional/long haul the 53 should be fine.
__________________
Mud, sweat, and gears
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.