USA Truck: Why no Jake Brakes?
#1
I have always wondered why USA Truck doesn't have jake brakes on their tractors? I thought it was a DOT regulation that big trucks had to have jakes. I know their trucks are pretty stripped down but having no jakes is taking it a little too far. 8)
__________________
"Looks like a legend and an outta work bum look a lotta like Daddy," Little Enos Burdette. Hook 'em Horns!! "Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid." John Wayne "Talk to me Goose". "What we're dealin' with here, is a complete lack of respect for the law," Sheriff Buford T. Justice. Friends don't let friends drive for C.R. England!
#2
Dunno why USA Trucks done have Jake Brakes. I guess, I've never thought about it. Some trucks have them, and some dont. I dont think it's a requirement by the DOT to have Jake Brakes.
It's always amazed me that no bigger than Ft. Smith is, they have bookoos of trucking companies, warehouses, etc. Of course, there is I-40 that runs right through there. Major interstate. I'm sure I've said this before, but my mom's family lives in Ft. Smith. (with the exception of her parents-deceased) I have thought about moving to Ft. Smith in the past, because of the trucking jobs there.
#3
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In the bunker
Posts: 2,676
Originally Posted by Midnight Flyer
I have always wondered why USA Truck doesn't have jake brakes on their tractors? I thought it was a DOT regulation that big trucks had to have jakes. I know their trucks are pretty stripped down but having no jakes is taking it a little too far. 8)
__________________
#4
I have no jake and knock on wood, I have yet to encounter a situation where I absolutely needed it. Leave plenty of distance ahead of me and it's all good. I do wish my gears were slightly shorter so that when I let off, the truck won't coast as easy, that it will act as it's own jake better than it currently does.
#6
There are a number of carriers who didn't have Jake brakes, including Heartland. I recall something about engine brakes being required on all newer trucks. I don't remember when the law was to have gone into effect.
#7
Originally Posted by GMAN
There are a number of carriers who didn't have Jake brakes, including Heartland. I recall something about engine brakes being required on all newer trucks. I don't remember when the law was to have gone into effect.
Kind of ironic isn't it? On the one hand said law requires an engine brake, and then more and more roads are being posted "No Engine Braking" to prohibit their use. Whoever said common sense is dead was right on the money.
__________________
If you can't shift it smoothly, you shouldn't be driving it.
#9
Originally Posted by GMAN
You should never use government and common sense in the same sentence. :P
You got that right!! :lol:
__________________
"Looks like a legend and an outta work bum look a lotta like Daddy," Little Enos Burdette. Hook 'em Horns!! "Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid." John Wayne "Talk to me Goose". "What we're dealin' with here, is a complete lack of respect for the law," Sheriff Buford T. Justice. Friends don't let friends drive for C.R. England!
#10
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: DelaWhere?
Posts: 42
I don't know where USA travels, but I'm guessing if the company doesn't do much mountian driving there really isn't much need for a jake.
Some guys also get ridiculous with them too - jaking on flat land and coming off bridges. They're probably the ones that get all defensive when their motors burn out early too... |
I have always wondered why USA Truck doesn't have jake brakes on their tractors? I thought it was a DOT regulation that big trucks had to have jakes. I know their trucks are pretty stripped down but having no jakes is taking it a little too far. 8)


