Tanker accident
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Champaign County Ohio
Posts: 105
Originally Posted by Fozzy
I'm waiting for the comments from the 9/11 wonks about fire not melting steel and how this had to be an "inside job" and was done with explosion.
And fozzy, I'm not going either way on this but it is a fact that the fire in the WTC was not hot enough (regardless of what Fox news told you) to completely melt the steel. At it's hottest the fire barely reached 1000 Deg. cel. and only burned for a short while. The fire did however play a role in the collapse, but was not the cause of it. The fire from the tanker was a lot hotter and burned a lot longer, hence the melted steel and the terrible mess that was made. My mind is open enough as well as I respect others enough to never ridicule another for haveing differing opinions from that of my own, no matter how outlandish it might be. I think you remark as well as heavyhaulerss remark was uncalled for and contributed absolutely nothing to this thread. And heavyhaulerss, when it comes to politics, everything starts out as a conspiracy, weather good or bad. Just look at Nixon and Watergate. My appologies to all for hijacking the thread.
__________________
"A society that will trade a little order for a little freedom will lose both, and deserve neither." - Thomas Jefferson I am a "moon bat" and proud of it.
#15
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,341
Originally Posted by jmilici
Originally Posted by Fozzy
I'm waiting for the comments from the 9/11 wonks about fire not melting steel and how this had to be an "inside job" and was done with explosion.
And fozzy, I'm not going either way on this but it is a fact that the fire in the WTC was not hot enough (regardless of what Fox news told you) to completely melt the steel. At it's hottest the fire barely reached 1000 Deg. cel. and only burned for a short while. The fire did however play a role in the collapse, but was not the cause of it. The fire from the tanker was a lot hotter and burned a lot longer, hence the melted steel and the terrible mess that was made. My mind is open enough as well as I respect others enough to never ridicule another for haveing differing opinions from that of my own, no matter how outlandish it might be. I think you remark as well as heavyhaulerss remark was uncalled for and contributed absolutely nothing to this thread. And heavyhaulerss, when it comes to politics, everything starts out as a conspiracy, weather good or bad. Just look at Nixon and Watergate. My appologies to all for hijacking the thread. First .. 550 degrees C is enough to weaken steel to 50% strength. Second ... Jet Fuel == Kerosene Gasoline = 11.5 kilocaloires per gram Kerosene = 11 grams ... it burns hot enough to melt steel. But in this case the fire only had to reach a heat level to weaken the attachment points. BTW) Ever see what happends to a jet after a crash? Melted aluminum and steel ... See Pan-Am airlines crash in Pango Pango ... Nothing left but charred wrackage. Jet fuel is a little tougher to get burning but it burns very very hot when ignited. :wink: Third .. the World Trade Center strcuture depended on attachments between the floors and the main structure to provide integrety. Once the fire weakened the steel ... the structure bowed out -- it set off a chain reaction. This has been modeled over and over again. Funny thing about the Internet .. it is now very easy to make sane arguments against absoutely nutty politically charged alligations. You are not open minded, but your tone represents a partisan willing to explore the alligations to change the truth to fit your beleif window.
#16
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Champaign County Ohio
Posts: 105
Crackaces, I actually have a degree in engineering so I do know how these things work. And like I said in my post, the fire did not cause the buildings to collapse, but IT DID PLAY A ROLE IN THE COLLAPSE. Maybe you should go back and re-read my post. You basically just proved me right. Thanks.
Know, lets listen to what yoopr said and keep on topic.
__________________
"A society that will trade a little order for a little freedom will lose both, and deserve neither." - Thomas Jefferson I am a "moon bat" and proud of it.
#17
as for my comments... i just like a lil humor now & then. i think it's good for people. i'm not sure about anything. i am opened minded also. my post was just humor. no attacks on anyone or any belief. apology to any offended. as now adays, anything & everything offends someone. not me.. i'm too busy being happy.
#18
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Champaign County Ohio
Posts: 105
Originally Posted by heavyhaulerss
as for my comments... i just like a lil humor now & then. i think it's good for people. i'm not sure about anything. i am opened minded also. my post was just humor. no attacks on anyone or any belief. apology to any offended. as now adays, anything & everything offends someone. not me.. i'm too busy being happy.
![]() I respect a person who is willing to think on his own and voice his opinion, even if they admit to wearing a tin foil hat.
__________________
"A society that will trade a little order for a little freedom will lose both, and deserve neither." - Thomas Jefferson I am a "moon bat" and proud of it.
#19
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by Crackaces
I think this is a good posting for the newbie section. This driver was reported to be going too fast for conditions. (The curve).
#20
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redneckistan
Posts: 2,831
It's a good thing that I want to also see this kept on topic... or else the moon bats would get upset...
The driver in this did cost the company probably it's existence. I worked for a propane outfit out there. One roll over and a history of some drivers running bad log books put the company out of business. Tanker work is great when everything works right.. it really sucks when things go wrong!
__________________
http://agoldstardad.wordpress.com/ |

