Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozzy
I'm waiting for the comments from the 9/11 wonks about fire not melting steel and how this had to be an "inside job" and was done with explosion.
|
There is always one or two in the croud that has to ridicule people with differing opinions than thiers. And the funny thing is, there has not been any "wonks" saying it's a conspiracy.
And fozzy, I'm not going either way on this but it is a fact that the fire in the WTC was not hot enough (regardless of what Fox news told you) to completely melt the steel. At it's hottest the fire barely reached 1000 Deg. cel. and only burned for a short while. The fire did however play a role in the collapse, but was not the cause of it.
The fire from the tanker was a lot hotter and burned a lot longer, hence the melted steel and the terrible mess that was made.
My mind is open enough as well as I respect others enough to never ridicule another for haveing differing opinions from that of my own, no matter how outlandish it might be. I think you remark as well as heavyhaulerss remark was uncalled for and contributed absolutely nothing to this thread.
And heavyhaulerss, when it comes to politics, everything starts out as a conspiracy, weather good or bad. Just look at Nixon and Watergate.
My appologies to all for hijacking the thread.