Bang, bang shoot'em up 1, 2, 3!

Thread Tools
  #91  
Old 07-18-2010, 06:52 PM
razorwyr's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Meridian, Mississippi
Posts: 62
Default

You have a link to back this up. I googled it and cant find any info. I did find that they did join the union on Dec. 14, 1819.
I have been looking for a link on it and will continue to look. As for now, I have not found one, but I have in the past so this boggles my mind. Alabama seceded from the Union on January 11, 1861 in Montgomery, Alabama, listed at the link below.

Southern States Order of Succession

I am going to look a little longer and will repost if/when I find a link to the absence of Alabama. I have found several that stated it DID rejoin the Union, however, every site that states that has a different date for when it rejoined, so I'm not sure how accurate the information is. Also, all of those sites state that there were only 11 states that seceded, when in fact there were 13. The two they leave off continuously are Missouri and Kentucky, which I have found supporting information on that. I guess I actually do have to do research for a change now since I made such a bold claim, however, I have indeed found this information in this past, the only question is how reliable was my source before.
 
__________________
  #92  
Old 07-18-2010, 10:10 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Default

Nope, must be a myth, everything I see says Alabama rejoined the USA in 1868. They would have had to rejoin in order to have US Senators and the likes in Washington DC.
 
  #93  
Old 07-19-2010, 03:33 AM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Default

Originally Posted by razorwyr
Also, all of those sites state that there were only 11 states that seceded, when in fact there were 13. The two they leave off continuously are Missouri and Kentucky, which I have found supporting information on that.
Might better find us a link on THIS info, too. From your own source site, I found this info to back up what I have always heard.... that Kentucky was a neutral state, with Union outposts that were attacked by Confederate armies.

Confederate Heartland Offensive/ Kentucky Campaign

Don't know about Missouri, but I can't imagine all these Civil War sites would somehow "mistakenly" forget about 2 whole states IF they had published a declaration of secession.
 
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.
  #94  
Old 07-19-2010, 04:45 AM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Default

Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland and Delaware were the 5 border slave states that did not secede, they stayed in the Union but called themselves neutral.
 
  #95  
Old 07-19-2010, 07:44 AM
Twilight Flyer's Avatar
The Bat Cave
Board Icon
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,712
Default

Popping my head in for a second to point something out that should be glaringly apparent, but gets lost in the argument about who has the bigger guns.
Hmm.... some interesting points to debate (without having to do more research...lol!)
You know, on a lighter note, my son does an absolutely spot-on George Bush impersonation, Hobo. He’d have you in stitches.
.
.
.
"I" made no such assumption. I referred to a civilian uprising that, for purpose of argument, was intent on overthrowing the government.... and thus declaring war on IT! I implied that the U.S. Military would do IT'S JOB... and defend our nation, union and government "against ALL enemies, foreign OR DOMESTIC" as it says in their OATH.
And I imagine that quite a few of them would label the current government as a DOMESTIC enemy. You seem to forget that in your liberal-leaning centrist beliefs (I am meeting you halfway here), that your view is not shared by everyone. Many people (including a whole helluva lot of military personnel) see the government as damaged, perhaps beyond repair. And that number is growing

* However.... Lincoln did exactly THAT.
Yes, yes, we know. The Civil War was a long time ago and as far as I know, Lincoln isn’t around giving Bam Bam any advice.
.
.
.
Again, you are partially correct. They ALSO have standing orders to NOT follow any "illegal" order. But, even under such an order.... what YOU say.... to attack the civilian population (without provocation,) you wouldn't have a military COUP (necessarily.) You'd have a military "rebellion" or "stand-down." [And chaos.]
As to what exactly would happen, it’s pure speculation on either side. I say they won’t fire on American citizens and maybe you do, too. And I totally agree that it would be pure chaos.

Usually... and in general.... a military coup is not a "bottom up" rebellion by troops given an order they don't like. It is a "top down" (and very secretive) PLAN to secure the support of the troops under the command of some very HIGHLY PLACED Generals to overthrow a government and especially aimed at it's leader.
What makes you think that the generals wouldn’t be spearheading a very public attempt at removing a criminal? Far-fetched yes (there’s a book in it somewhere), but I mention it to make the point that those HIGHLY placed generals would probably be thinking the same thing those assault rifle toting grunts are thinking, in the event that the president ordered a full-scale attack on the citizens of this country.
.
.
.
Well.... I believe you are misguided in your historical knowledge. Several posters here agree with me that, during the Civil War, MANY families were split either by "lines of demarcation" or by philisophical beliefs. I don't know of any ACTUAL cases of "brother against brother," but I'm SURE there were soldiers that had to wage war on cities, towns or areas that they had "attachments" to! There are MANY stories of opposing soldiers meeting during a "cease fire" and talking about the SAME "home" and memories.
And of course, there is the Christmas story back in World War I where Allied and German troops had a cease-fire, climbed out of their trenches, and shared Christmas together, before going back to fighting and killing each other the next day.

Point I was making is that the north vs. the south was nearly the equivalent of two separate countries – really was, considering the southern states had seceded and had they been victorious in the war, would have likely created a new nation. In other words, binding ties aside, it would have been a whole lot easier for the two sides to fight each other than the direction we are going today.

Again, if it came to an all-out armed conflict between our government and her citizens TODAY, you are going to find that by and large, American troops are not going to go to war against their friends and families.
.
.
.
Well, we agree on this. Unfortunately, I fear that there is such a movement afoot that MAY not be so "small scale." But, my contention stands that, if SOME Americans take up arms against our government, for anything OTHER than "self protection" against what YOU call the government declaring WAR on the citizens... or perhaps an "all out ban" on guns in the country (which will NEVER happen,) ....
I’ll stop you there on that point. I’m not talking about an all out gun-ban. That would just be a small part of the whole that pushed the citizens of this country over the edge. There’s a lot of ingredients in that boiling pot right now.

The U.S. Military will do it's JOB and put such a revolt DOWN! It may be ugly. But, it will NOT be much of a contest.
This is what I wanted to touch on. Look at Iraq and Afghanistan. We’ve got a whole boatload of troops out there fighting against a bunch of terrorists that really don’t care much about WHO they kill, as long as they can kill a few American soldiers at the same time. If 50 or 60 innocents people die at the same time, so be it. Works for them. They are fighting with outdated weapons, against a superior fighting force, they live like cockroaches, and most of them are trucked in from neighboring countries to take up the fight.

Now, do you honestly think that 70 million well-armed and well-stocked American citizens, fighting on their own property for their own family, friends, and freedoms, would not be much of a contest?

Talk about delusional. :roll:
.
.
.
Again... I have said nothing about such a "full scale" uprising. I've mentioned that the TEA Party wears guns and talks TALL about "Second Amendment remedies"... and they STIR THE POT!
Oh give it a break. Stirring the pot is done on both sides and the liberals and supporters of the criminals in charge are not lily-white.

I have said NOTHING (and neither has Obama) about an armed attempt to disarm American citizens! I disagree with you that an all-out uprising is not a FAR-fetched scenario! I continue to believe that the remedy in America... is the VOTE! And MOST Americans, regardless of how angry they might be, are NOT advocates of militarist insurrection against our government.
An armed attempt to disarm American citizens would result in that full scale war. I don’t think your boy in the White House is an idiot – I think everything he does is coldly calculated to give him exactly what he’s looking for. And I think that more and more people are waking up to that fact. So unlike you, I do not believe it is a far-fetched scenario. We already know that the VOTE isn’t going to fix things – it’s the VOTE that got us into the mess we are currently in. Like you, I HOPE the vote could get us started digging out of it and I have high hopes that a lot of slimeballs are going to be given their walking papers in November. But I don’t know if it’s going to fix things – there is such a thing as going over the edge or past the point of no return and I think we have finally moved beyond that point.

Sure, there would be the share of Francis' that would be screaming 'I'll kill ya!' as they did just that.
Sorry, I don't understand this reference.
You don’t remember the movie “Stripes”? Francis was the guy that kept telling everyone he would kill them. “If you touch my stuff…I’ll kill ya! If you touch me…I’ll kill ya!” That’s where the saying “Lighten up, Francis” came from.
.
.
.
Well... this is an interesting delusion.
One man’s delusion is another man’s truth.

I hadn't THOUGHT about U.N. forces protecting our government against it's OWN military (let alone the people.) But, now that you force me to think about it? I doubt it would happen.
Would you be your life on that? I wouldn’t.

The U.N. Forces KNOW that they cannot win in such a situation. I'm quite sure they would "sit it out" and deal with whoever WINS!
Again, I don’t share your opinion. I think about through recent history at the different presidents that we had and even those that I did not like, I could never see them getting the population stirred up like the current POTUS. I cannot picture them turning to the UN for help stomping down on the citizens of this country, either. But I can see the current POTUS doing that and doing so quite easily. Perhaps that’s what stirs me up so much against this guy – he is so blatantly anti-American that it’s downright scary. And just because YOU cannot see that, doesn’t mean that he isn’t. It just means that you haven’t yet opened your eyes.

I think you've been playing too many video games, Twilight! And watching TOO much FauxNews!
I play few video games and watch ZERO news. I prefer to get my news in readable form from various sources from BOTH sides of the political fence and I do just that. It allows me to see things more clearly and make better decisions based on what I am seeing.
.
.
.
I realize that YOU are "chilled" by your delusional scenario... but, I don't believe MOST Americans are.
Again, you might be surprised at what MOST Americans believe today and even more so when you realize that you are in a shrinking minority.

In general, you are "fearing" that things have gotten so bad that there MUST or WILL or MIGHT be an American ARMED uprising against some supposedly "tyrannical" government (that WE elected) sometime soon.
In the first place, we are already under a tyrannical government. It’s just in feel-good mode right now. And yes, I feel that things have gotten so bad that something has to give.

Furthermore.... you suspect it will be over GUN RIGHTS which MIGHT pit the military (or some PART of them) against it's own government (for the protection of their families.)
I don’t know where you are getting the idea that I think this is all over gun rights?!? If the government decided to come after the firearms of this nation’s citizens, it would erupt into nationwide violence. I don’t believe there is any doubt about that. But gun control being the catalyst here? Have you been paying attention for the past 18 months? The laundry list of what the current disaster-in-chief has destroyed in this country is pages and page long and growing and people are fed up. At this point, it’s no longer a matter of IF, but a matter of WHEN. If you don’t share that belief, that’s fine – it’s your right because at this moment, you have the freedom to feel that way. But mark my words, when the time comes that MY rights to think and do as I please are curtailed, then so will yours…unless, of course, you’re just planning on being a Bam Bam Yes Man. Then you’ll probably get a free pass.

I contend that the current "militaristic" attitude is more about policy... and interestingly enough.... perhaps about States' Rights! But, the number of people who count themselves as "Tea Partiers," OR those who would support armed insurrection against our government (and not ALL gun owners would DO so...) are like a gnat on the government's AZZ!!

They will get "noticed," but they can be squashed anytime we get tired of them.
Then you’re not paying attention.

That being said, I double-dog dare you to come try and squash me. Now imagine 70 million plus saying the same thing.
.
.
.
For the record... I think they have done us a service in waking us up to government excesses! I hope something GOOD comes of it. But, anyone who thinks it will lead to revolution is DELUSIONAL!
Again, you aren’t paying attention, then. And I never said it WILL lead to revolution. I have said that it's quite possible, even likely. Whether it gets to that point is going to hinge greatly on what happens in the next 5 months.

And I appreciate that you didn't say, as so many do... that this is ONLY about Obama!
It’s about government in general. I have never been big on government…as long as I live my life the right way and pay my taxes (to a reasonable extent), then government needs to leave me the FLOCK alone. However, the thing that government has become today is far from what our founding fathers envisioned for this country. Now, I’m pizzed off, a sentiment being repeated by tens of millions of American citizens every day. It’s not just a disenfranchised populace anymore. It’s real life people feeling they have been pushed to the limit and are ready to fight back.
.
.
.
Okay... you've made your point. But....
I always do.

1) The U.S. Military has DONE so before... against the citizens of the South.
Relevant to then; irrelevant to today.

2) NO president would EVER attempt an "all out ban" on GUNS in America!
One would hope not. But my arguments have not been based on that, either. That’s only a small piece of the Jenga stack…maybe the piece that brings the tower down, but a single piece nevertheless.

3) There will never BE an "all out" revolution of the people of America against it's government. The number of people who even THINK about doing such.... LOUD AS THEY MAY BE..... are less than 5% of the population!
And why is that? Because you don’t feel that way? I’ll say it again…you haven’t been paying attention. Look, just because it hasn’t happened before, doesn’t mean it won’t ever happen. That’s a fool’s argument. There are reasons that the Tea Party has risen so quickly and to such strength – it’s because people have had enough and are done being pushed around by big government. You should zip the lip for a while and start listening to what those on the other side of the fence are saying. Find out WHY they are so mad and to WHAT extent they will act to change things. You might be surprised (and chilled) at what you might discover.

4) Under the WORST of secenarios.... I still believe that the MAJORITY of our armed forces will live UP to their oath, and support the government! Obviously, it would be chaos! But, history tells us that "forces" are involved that we don't see on the surface.... such as the "hostage taking" of Baltimore mentioned earlier.
I disagree completely. I don’t see the MAJORITY of our armed forces obeying a president that orders them to exterminate their family and friends. Over the past 6 months, I’ve had this discussion with a number of military people, including a couple that support Bam Bam. Their feelings on the matter did not surprise me at all – they mirror my own. And it’s a feeling that appears to be widely shared by military personnel.

5) In general, I believe this ENTIRE argument to be bogus and not worth the time to discuss! Really! There are more important matters in America today. And the answers lie in a "representative" form of government.... NOT in armed revolution!
Well, if we had a representative form of government, then we could get to work on fixing things, right? But we do NOT have a representative government and haven’t had one for over 18 months. I’ve been saying this for a number of years…when the pendulum swings too far to one side, half of America is no longer heard. And if things continue on their current course, we’ll see that pendulum swing the other way in November and then completely knock the scales over in 2012. Where will YOU be then? Same place I am today.

The only question remaining is, who is going to fire the first shot?
 
__________________


  #96  
Old 07-19-2010, 08:28 AM
Mackman's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Concordville PA
Posts: 3,841
Default

Hobo must be rubbing off on you TF to make a long azz post like that.:lol:
 
__________________
Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

"All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug


  #97  
Old 07-19-2010, 08:48 AM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Default

Originally Posted by Mackman
Hobo must be rubbing off on you TF to make a long azz post like that.:lol:
What are you talking about, Mackman? Twilight has ALWAYS been a "closet" Windbag! He just felt shackled by I.B. :lol::lol:

But, I have to admit that I now understand some of the complaints from those who MIGHT want to respond to one of MY posts... but, just don't have the TIME! :eek2::lol2:
 
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.
  #98  
Old 07-19-2010, 08:59 AM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland and Delaware were the 5 border slave states that did not secede, they stayed in the Union but called themselves neutral.
I have recently read some about the "border states," but didn't know exactly which ones they were. Having done some historical research recently on Kentucky, I was aware that they at least "strove" for neutrality. Thanks for the info, Mr. Ford.

You gotta "feel" for these states who were, essentially, caught in the middle.

Dubya told the World that they either had to be WITH us... or AGAINST us. (Had to squeeze that in.) But, it's interesting that during the Civil War, there were states who clearly stated they would NOT choose a side! Of course, their lands were ravaged anyways! (to some extent.) :hellno:
 
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.
  #99  
Old 07-19-2010, 09:50 AM
Twilight Flyer's Avatar
The Bat Cave
Board Icon
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,712
Default

Mackman said:
Hobo must be rubbing off on you TF to make a long azz post like that.
I do that for Hobo and to see how many times Windy has to go take a potty break.

And Hobo:
What are you talking about, Mackman? Twilight has ALWAYS been a "closet" Windbag! He just felt shackled by I.B.
The only shackles with IB was having to take a neutral stance in any dork-swinging manly men fights. Now I can pull up a chair and pop some popcorn.

But, I have to admit that I now understand some of the complaints from those who MIGHT want to respond to one of MY posts... but, just don't have the TIME!
You know you love it...anyone can give a 5 second sound bite. A long thoughtful posts gives you something to think about - someone that can answer your posts with like-minded posts from the other side of the aisle makes you work; makes you think before you reply.

I many not agree with you on many things, but I read your posts, even the long ones. Some of the time, I may think you've gone off the deep end. But I still read what you have to say.
 
__________________


  #100  
Old 07-19-2010, 09:57 AM
Roadhog's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tartuga .......me thinks
Posts: 9,876
Default

Originally Posted by Twilight Flyer
In the first place, we are already under a tyrannical government. It’s just in feel-good mode right now. And yes, I feel that things have gotten so bad that something has to give.
I agree, and what I see happening, is this Executive Branch does not care about the Congressional elections this fall. Obama knows he already has unlimited power. He could care less who is keeping/loosing their seat. I'm also seeing the Judicial Branch in the cross hairs, and will soon be made as useless as Congress. (IMO for all you hobos)
 
__________________


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:32 AM.

Top