[Roadhog]

Offer your solution to a problem. :block:
Serious or funny, big or small, real or far fetched...
plenty of topics to cover.

I'll start... how to end the war in Afghanistan.

Lob some dud-nuclear ballistic missiles into the mountains...letting them stick half-way into the ground, proceeding to make a loud ticking sound.
(tick-tick-tick-tick)
Then shoot down everything that comes running out of the mountain. issedoff:

[Rev.Vassago]

How to fix the economy:

Shoot the economists.

[wildkat]

OMG!!! You're both dead (no pun intended) on!!!!

:bow: :bow: :bow:

[mommee]

Originally Posted by Roadhog

Offer your solution to a problem. :block:
Serious or funny, big or small, real or far fetched...
plenty of topics to cover.

I'll start... how to end the war in Afghanistan.

Lob some dud-nuclear ballistic missiles into the mountains...letting them stick half-way into the ground, proceeding to make a loud ticking sound.
(tick-tick-tick-tick)
Then shoot down everything that comes running out of the mountain. issedoff:

just bombard the place with pork chops.

[golfhobo]

Is this a serious thread? It LOOKED like a serious thread, but doesn't really SMELL like one. I don't know. Hmm..... If I THOUGHT it was a serious thread, I MIGHT offer a serious solution to a problem. But, I just can't be sure.

Considering the source of the thread starter, I just don't know. Hmm.... I think I'll wait awhile and see how it develops.

I'm not as concerned about someone stealing my idea to save the world from nuclear destruction as I am being laughed at for my idea. If this is a joke thread, I don't want to give a serious solution to a major problem.

I will just have to wait and see where this goes.

[Rev.Vassago]

How to solve arguments with golfhobo:

Apply alcohol, and wait for him to post a rant, thereby getting himself put into time out.

:argue::drunk::booze::cheers::ranting::batman: :flame::banana1:

[Roadhog]

Originally Posted by golfhobo

Is this a serious thread? It LOOKED like a serious thread, but doesn't really SMELL like one. I don't know. Hmm..... If I THOUGHT it was a serious thread, I MIGHT offer a serious solution to a problem. But, I just can't be sure.

Considering the source of the thread starter, I just don't know. Hmm.... I think I'll wait awhile and see how it develops.

My first paragraph outlined the answer to your first question.
Another universal problem solved! :block:

Originally Posted by Hog

Offer your solution to a problem. :block:
Serious or funny, big or small, real or far fetched...
plenty of topics to cover.

[Roadhog]

Hobo, problems of the Universe are infinite. They can be anything from serious to absurd. I prefer laughable knowledge. :block:

How about 2+2=4 ? Basic assumption...yet false, as 2+2 can not be universally true to be 4.
Maybe in the abstract world of arithmetic, but in our real world, it can not be universally true.
Two tires and two more tires, will not equal four tires.
Each tire is slightly different from the next. How about taking it to a more precise level?
Two precisely engineered objects, will not equal the sum of two other precisely engineered objects, because of differences at the nano-level.

Math can not be applied to a physical relationship, as it is abstract. It is more philosophy.
The laws of math have been imposed on our reality, in which we base our belief in, yet there are deeper realities, and truths.
We have to separate the analytical truth that 2+2=4 with the empirical process of calculation. The inductive observation that 2+2=4
does not require anyone to observe it to be true. It is true independently of our existence and the existence of space-time and matter.
But further, how do you perceive true laws of mathematics? Do you base it on physical life? or artificial intelligence? A computer would
fry itself on such a simple assumption, where as a human will intuit certain truths. We simply apply a false rule that 2+2=4.
Whenever someone asks the question, we simply always answer 4.

To that we have to ask ourselves, is our application for physical relationship? or philosophy? Pure math? or applied math?
2+2=4......only because we believe it to be so.
Truth is...2+2 does not equal 4.

Un=Un-1+Un-2, or the Fibonacci Recurrence of Whole Numbers, is one example of math formula which can rule the outcome and manifestation of the universe.
Plainly put...the lowest common denominator, can rule the outcome of both man and nature.
Man exists and experiences this universe from the 10 to the zero power perspective. One must convert the electromagnetic power that causes the ionization
and polarization that drives the evolution of all things in this universe to a proportion relative to mans perspective.
One must first quantify the "now" in order to mathematically formulate values of the "before now" or "subsequent now".
To do this, we measure or quantify. That is how we base our reality. We measure everything within time and space, according to our perspectives upon a physical
existence. A second is to the building of mans subjective reality as an atom is to the construction of matter.
The second by second choices made within mans subjective reality which causes it to be as it is in any moment or second.

2+2=4 is only subjective.
It is illogical.... Live Long and Prosper.

[Rev.Vassago]

Originally Posted by Roadhog

Two precisely engineered objects, will not equal the sum of two other precisely engineered objects, because of differences at the nano-level.

Not if I engineered them. In that case, 2+2=fire.

[ironeagle_2006]

How to stop ALL TERRORISM in the world. One flat out say the Next attack on any nation in the world the Muslim religion loses MECCA their Holiest site. If they do not learn the second site to go GLASS is Medina the Birthplace of Medina. So who as a sponsort or leader of Islamic Terrorists would WANT to be responsible for the destruction of their religions holiest sites.