Who said that I condone or support this? They lied about their age. They provided Florida driver licenses that said they were infact "of legal age".

I agree, he is clearly guilty of being a smut merchant......... "ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL flavor of the founding documents. ALL men/ mankind means that everyone is equal under the law, not just the majority, Clarifying the constitution is what the amendments do".............. Your words not mine, although I do agree with your statement.

I'm glad that your flattered, but don't be. It took a whole 5 minutes to get your quotes from two different pages found in you "view all of Fozzy's posts"

I don't support him for what he does professionally. I am supporting him because I feel he has been wrongly imprisoned. The only Girls Gone Wild footage I have ever seen was the censored infomercials aired on TV.

I'm not sure what you mean? There are no images of these girls. How can one pleasure themselves to something that doesn't exist?

 

I know I said I was done talking about it, but a thought just occurred to me, if he really shouldnt be in jail, why doesnt he hire a real lawyer who will do something besides call radio shows? I know it gets him sympathy from people like you, but that aint gonna get him out. He certainly has the money and as OJ and Robert Blake proved, money and fame can get you out of anything.

 

Doesn't matter, he is still guilty of filming underage girls, this is a crime, had he been serving booze, he'd be guilty. It happens all the time and all the time the scumbags cry when they get caught doing so.

And the context is still wrong (conveniently by you of course) All men are created equal and smut merchants who are arrested get to go the legal process. The created equal statement is for those with a zero slate. The statement generally applies to those who have not already proven themselves to be criminals and scumbags.. This scumbag started out equal and is being treated under the law as the process. Now he in jail because of what he has done... Had you or I been accused of illegally taking nude pictures of kids .. guess where we would probably be?
The point is that you still busted your arse going into the archives, viewing and of course selectively harvesting out of context quotes pretending that it bolsters your argument. The same could be done to you.. but I'm just not that desperate.

Too bad your not the judge who had all the evidence and who is presiding over the case.

 

Am I missing something? What are the actual charges against this guy?

 

I'm not sure what the actual charges are, his lawyer never said, he just said that Joe is a saint and has never done anything wrong

 

Tune in next month as Joe Farancis farts and does # 2 without knowing or feeling it anymore after filming ...INMATES...gone wild :shock:

 

NEWS FLASH FOR FOZZY! Joe Francis did not film the girls. A contracted cameraman filmed the girls so how is Joe Francis guilty of a crime he didn't commit? Innocent until proven guilty? I mean if he's so guilty the prosecution must have charged him and used it as evidence against him but they didn't because he isn't the one guilty of this specific crime.




My context is wrong? It's like you stop reading mid sentence. Did something catch your attention before you were finished reading my post? The very next words are "everyone is equal under the law", but you say it's only if the slate is zero? Doesn't everyone equal under the law mean it doesn't matter if your poor, rich, white, black, scum, saint, smart or stupid that no matter what you are your going to get a fair and equal chance of defending yourself? My context is wrong? Your context is incomplete sir.


Maybe in the long run I used your statements to bolster my argument but I mainly did it to prove you stand for nothing. You use the "laws of the land" when it's something you believe in but if you don't agree with something "the laws of the land" go right out the door. If you say something stand behind it but don't change your views when it's not convenient for you.

Had all the evidence? Did the Judge lose it or something?

 

Here's some audio for people who don't like to read.

http://www.meetjoefrancis.com/media/radio/

 

So we still get it.. you support child porn...