Meet Joe Francis

Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 12-09-2007, 02:27 AM
Fredog's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 3,756
Default

I have said all I am going to say on this subject, there are plenty of other things to argue about
 
  #32  
Old 12-09-2007, 07:19 AM
ben45750's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,863
Default

Originally Posted by Fredog
I have said all I am going to say on this subject, there are plenty of other things to argue about
Originally Posted by Fredog
what about the tape with joe telling the girls to lie about their age? oh yea lets not let the facts get in the way.
maybe you could start a joe francis fan club
I'm still waiting for that fact your claiming. Remember, the one that got in my way?
 
__________________

  #33  
Old 12-09-2007, 07:36 AM
Fredog's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 3,756
Default

Originally Posted by ben45750
Originally Posted by Fredog
I have said all I am going to say on this subject, there are plenty of other things to argue about
Originally Posted by Fredog
what about the tape with joe telling the girls to lie about their age? oh yea lets not let the facts get in the way.
maybe you could start a joe francis fan club
I'm still waiting for that fact your claiming. Remember, the one that got in my way?

I'm waiting for a good reason to give a crap
 
  #34  
Old 12-09-2007, 07:50 AM
ben45750's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,863
Default

Fozzy, how do you feel about Joe Francis's rights being violated by the state of Florida?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 12:48 pm
This is ignorance of the Constitution. pure and simple. The Constitution has been amended to CLARIFY the statements in the basic document as a guard to protect minority rights. The amendments are there to insist that all adult citizens have the rights that every other adult citizen has.
Do you think it's wrong to persecute a man simply because of his affiliations and business dealings?
Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:33 pm
ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL flavor of the founding documents. ALL men/ mankind means that everyone is equal under the law, not just the majority, Clarifying the constitution is what the amendments do.
So do you feel that young women on spring break lose their inhibitions because they drink so much? or is it just poor morals? Do you think the city's that host "Spring Break" should clean up their act and not allow this to happen?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:17 am
You cannot even go to a public event anymore without some dumb drunken broad flipping her body parts out for the other liquored up lemmings to ogle at.
So Joe Francis is wrong for selling images or drunk young girls?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:39 pm
Sex is such a small portion of everyone's lives that it amazes me that people lose their friggen minds so quickly over the subject.
So you think this "Crime" has all been blown out of proportion?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Sat Feb 04, 2006
To have a CRIME there must be someones property made non-usable or there must be injury caused to another party. In this debate, this just doesn't meet the standard of a crime.
:lol:
 
__________________

  #35  
Old 12-09-2007, 08:02 AM
ben45750's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,863
Default

Originally Posted by Fredog
Originally Posted by ben45750
Originally Posted by Fredog
I have said all I am going to say on this subject, there are plenty of other things to argue about
Originally Posted by Fredog
what about the tape with joe telling the girls to lie about their age? oh yea lets not let the facts get in the way.
maybe you could start a joe francis fan club
I'm still waiting for that fact your claiming. Remember, the one that got in my way?

I'm waiting for a good reason to give a crap
So why all the sudden do you not give a crap? You were pretty eager to jump on this thread to tell me I was wrong and that I was ignoring the fact that he was seen on tape telling the girls to lie about their age. So you don't give a crap because you don't want to let facts get in your way?

You should have just said, I don't like the guy and he's a scumbag instead of making up things you know nothing about.
 
__________________

  #36  
Old 12-09-2007, 08:37 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redneckistan
Posts: 2,831
Default

Originally Posted by ben45750
Fozzy, how do you feel about Joe Francis's rights being violated by the state of Florida?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 12:48 pm
This is ignorance of the Constitution. pure and simple. The Constitution has been amended to CLARIFY the statements in the basic document as a guard to protect minority rights. The amendments are there to insist that all adult citizens have the rights that every other adult citizen has.
Do you think it's wrong to persecute a man simply because of his affiliations and business dealings?
Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:33 pm
ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL flavor of the founding documents. ALL men/ mankind means that everyone is equal under the law, not just the majority, Clarifying the constitution is what the amendments do.
So do you feel that young women on spring break lose their inhibitions because they drink so much? or is it just poor morals? Do you think the city's that host "Spring Break" should clean up their act and not allow this to happen?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 6:17 am
You cannot even go to a public event anymore without some dumb drunken broad flipping her body parts out for the other liquored up lemmings to ogle at.
So Joe Francis is wrong for selling images or drunk young girls?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Fri Feb 03, 2006 10:39 pm
Sex is such a small portion of everyone's lives that it amazes me that people lose their friggen minds so quickly over the subject.
So you think this "Crime" has all been blown out of proportion?

Originally Posted by Fozzy Sat Feb 04, 2006
To have a CRIME there must be someones property made non-usable or there must be injury caused to another party. In this debate, this just doesn't meet the standard of a crime.
:lol:
So I get it.. you condone and support what for all intents and purposes is legally child porn. I eagerly await the pics and videos of the memorial your building in your front yard to this smut merchant...

The quotes that you busted your arse to get are really not making your argument for you especially since you used them completely out of context to THIS discussion. You just showed that you are about as low class as the scumbag you are defending.. just how many times a day DO you pleasure yourself to these images of underage girls anyway? That Barney show must really make you happy..
 
  #37  
Old 12-09-2007, 09:35 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: pod# 110 -Shared with a high risk in a red jumper.
Posts: 2,240
Default

Originally Posted by Fozzy
So I get it.. you condone and support what for all intents and purposes is legally child porn. I eagerly await the pics and videos of the memorial your building in your front yard to this smut merchant...

The quotes that you busted your arse to get are really not making your argument for you especially since you used them completely out of context to THIS discussion. You just showed that you are about as low class as the scumbag you are defending.. just how many times a day DO you pleasure yourself to these images of underage girls anyway? That Barney show must really make you happy..

Let's make no mistake a 17 year old girl in college who is probably almost 18 anyways is hardly a young flower of innocence lacking knowledge of the world and sexual content , But you are trying to paint the picture of innocent young "children" having their innocence taken advatage of by a pervert with a camera...Not the case A Catholic priest molesting a 8 yrd boy and taking pictures = child porography /child molestation ...A permiscuous 17 yr old in college is hardly an innocent child ,and is hardly a victim when she decides to act out like herself infront of a camera with the knowledge of being filmed on spring break . I'm just having a hard time with associating college aged girls who run around screwing ,drinking ,And doing drugs freely on spring break as victims of "child pronography" because they willingly acted like ho's for the camera . ...And as for the guy being a smut merchant well that's not really your concern ,as you have the choice in America of not buying or watching the smut he peddles , But please don't try to put these college aged girls in light that potrays them as being innocent and unaware of their actions ... :wink:
 
  #38  
Old 12-09-2007, 10:26 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redneckistan
Posts: 2,831
Default

Originally Posted by BIG JEEP on 44's
Originally Posted by Fozzy
So I get it.. you condone and support what for all intents and purposes is legally child porn. I eagerly await the pics and videos of the memorial your building in your front yard to this smut merchant...

The quotes that you busted your arse to get are really not making your argument for you especially since you used them completely out of context to THIS discussion. You just showed that you are about as low class as the scumbag you are defending.. just how many times a day DO you pleasure yourself to these images of underage girls anyway? That Barney show must really make you happy..

Let's make no mistake a 17 year old girl in college who is probably almost 18 anyways is hardly a young flower of innocence lacking knowledge of the world and sexual content , But you are trying to paint the picture of innocent young "children" having their innocence taken advatage of by a pervert with a camera...Not the case A Catholic priest molesting a 8 yrd boy and taking pictures = child porography /child molestation ...A permiscuous 17 yr old in college is hardly an innocent child ,and is hardly a victim when she decides to act out like herself infront of a camera with the knowledge of being filmed on spring break . I'm just having a hard time with associating college aged girls who run around screwing ,drinking ,And doing drugs freely on spring break as victims of "child pronography" because they willingly acted like ho's for the camera . ...And as for the guy being a smut merchant well that's not really your concern ,as you have the choice in America of not buying or watching the smut he peddles , But please don't try to put these college aged girls in light that potrays them as being innocent and unaware of their actions ... :wink:
Just because there is a market for it, it still doesn't make it legal, nor does this make the smut merchant less guilty. Just like some bar who serves underage people, they are liable under the law for serving minors. Again, you are either supporting child porn or not.. if you are making an excuse for this scumbag, you support child porn. The age is not relevant,
 
  #39  
Old 12-09-2007, 10:36 AM
trux's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 189
Default

The local officials didn't want Joe filming in their town and publicly made a big deal out of it.

So when Joe legally shut them down, that publicly embarrassed them.

Anyone with any brains knows that once you've done something like that, it's time to get out of town and stay out of town. Because at that point, it doesn't matter what's legal or illegal, those guys are going to get you one way or another.

On another note I find it amazing the number of people willing to abandon due process just because this arrogant a$$ is a scumbag.
 
  #40  
Old 12-09-2007, 10:57 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: pod# 110 -Shared with a high risk in a red jumper.
Posts: 2,240
Default

Originally Posted by Fozzy
Just because there is a market for it, it still doesn't make it legal, nor does this make the smut merchant less guilty. Just like some bar who serves underage people, they are liable under the law for serving minors. Again, you are either supporting child porn or not.. if you are making an excuse for this scumbag, you support child porn. The age is not relevant,


You're so funny ...yes he peddles smut , but I fail to be able place him in the light of a child porographer ...How can you say he's a child pornographer ,and say "the age is not relivant" ...Please Fozzy go back to church bingo ,and rally up money to save the works from the SINNNERRS !!! :wink: :lol:
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Top