At present fuel costs are the #1 problem that all companies and O/O's are really fighting. And yes for idiling the APU solution is probably the better direction to go. But many O/O can not afford & many companies are not installing.

This is a general inquiry for the Company Drivers. I have heard about one major company that is having their company drivers sign a letter that if their idiling goes above 25% in winter and 30% in summer ( Based on truck miles driven) they will be charged for the fuel use above those percetages , by the month, and it will be taken out of their pay. This company does not have APU's instaled on their Company driver vehicles.

So 10 hour rest times and 34 hour resets are going to be a resky item to c/w with out sweating or freezing, thus resting will be intolerable sometimes and the driver will not be as safe as he/she should be due to lack of comftorable rest. In the summer trying to sleep when your cab is at the 100 F or in the winter your cab is at the other extreme is not the logical way to force your drivers to live. Again, no rest = unsafe driver.
Are the A/C set at 80+ at the company office and the Heat set at 55 or lower? NO

My inquiry is:

1) General comments on the above.

2) Are any other companies doing similar items to their company drivers?

Regards.
Mr C

 

Im hearing alot of what you are saying from other drivers, whether out here on the road or on these forums. Idling is becoming a big problem for the companies considering fuel costs only. (other that state regs). When the truck runs out of route or is idling the company is not recovering any fuel surcharge for that fuel used, and it is becoming a bigger expense as the fuel cost rise, to idle the trucks
Why companies are not taking greater measures to assist in the drivers needs is really beyond me. Although I dont know if APUs are the real answer they certainly can help greatly.
The higher the fuel costs the cheaper the APU really is. when look at it from a return in the initial investment. Companies should be doing what they can to purchase and have installed, by the manufacture, the APUs while the fuel costs are high. I also have to assume the "bulk" purchasing of the APU and having the manufacturer install the unit will bring the cost of the APU down from its actual retail cost.
I did some "mental" math using simple numbers. Assuming continuous idling at peak seasons. 10hrs idling at $5.00 per gallon at about 1gal per hour is costing about $50 a day for idling during each of break. Keep in mind this doesnt account for any additional idling you may do waiting at shippers and receivers.
With an APU. Assuming about 1/10-2/10 of a gallon per hour. You burn 1-2 gallons per 10hrs break, and thats probably at continuous running of the generator. The generator only kicks on when needed for cooling. So at most somewhere between maybe $5+ per 10 hrs break in fuel used.
Just using "trucker" math I can see an APU paying for itself in 6-7 months depending on the usage of the truck and APU.

I drive for Werner. Most drivers have probably noticed that Werner is converting their fleet to APUs. I had my APU installed just about 1month ago. My idling went from about 30% to practically 0...mmediately. My trucks fuel economy shot up to between 6.5 to 7.4 mpg. Depending on the load and terrain Im driving on. I drive a Classic XL. Prior to the APU the fuel economy was averaging in the low 5s, and mid 4s in the winter.

To help with your questions....Not all Werner trucks are equipped with APUs. Werners policy regarding idling non APU trucks is idle the truck when necessary. Specifically when trying to rest you may idle to stay warm or cool as appropriate. Otherwise minimize the idling as much as possible. They have stated (on qualcom) that high idling will be dealt with. I presume to mean they will be keeping an eye on those high idle trucks and determine based on mileage the driver has vice wait time what is really necessary and what is not.

 

We were asked to shut trucks off when they were going to idle for more then five minutes. Other then that we are asked to just use common sense. They want us well rested and they realize you can't do that if you are sweating all night or freezing.

 

so which company is mailing out the-- "we gonna charge the driver- the extra fuel" letters-- so I can avoid them. Or if it's Heartland-- I'll know to no be carrying a large balance on my credit card( I'll need room for another rental car+ taxi).

 

Surprise!! Doesn't Covenant already have a similar "driver friendly" program? :evil: They're soooooo Christian.:evil:

Just when you think that they couldn't possibly stoop any lower. What other industry operates like this?

These acts of desperation by these companies are becoming more reckless daily. I just wonder how long it will be until these companies are held accountable for the consequences of these draconian policies.

Gainey Transportation Servicesseems to have cornered the market on an innovative, driver friendly solution. As told (again :wink: ) by our own Big Jeep on 44's;

i just put out my resume this home time ,because in addition to low miles and only .33 cpm Gainey can't even offer their divers the ability to keep the truck cool when on break,as they only give 30% idle time ,which is only 3.5 hours a day on top of 50 moving hours which could be 2500-3000 miles...heck they sat me in Dallas Tx for 2 days of 100 degree weather ,and they expect no idilng ,and don't do buiness with ide aire b/c they are both chapter 11...they offer no alteratives to get a/c in the summer and heat in the winter without idiling the truck ...they wrote me up for idiling 8hrs day while sleeping because it's more than 3.5hrs allowed ...in order to not get wrote up again i paid $140.00 for 2 days in a motel ,and then i get qualcomm message stating goo job your idle is down ...no sh!t sherlock !...that's because i wasn't in te truck the 2 100 degree days t sat in Dallas...I can't wait to get away...I'm even looking at Werner again b/c atleast they respected the driver enough to give them a/c in the summer,and heat in the winter...and not just while driving..

Oh, brother Jeep, the bankruptcy of Idle Aire has nothing to do with it. We know the real reason.:twisted: Sorry that you're living this hell my friend.

 

I am sorry....anybody who signs such BS gets everything they deserve. Its one thing if you drive out of route and they want to charge you for the extra miles. Its another thing when I need a 10h break. Like drew10 said.......a 10h break costs $50. How about a 34h restart??? The big companies could for sure get some good deals on some hotels which are getting cheaper then the idling these days. When the fuel surcharge dont cover the breaks the truckers take....then the fuel surcharge is too low. Since the 10h breaks are required by law these expenses should be INCLUDED in the daily cost of business and added to the CUSTOMER.

 

As a new driver-I was just wondering - is it just my company(GTI) that has its trucks set so they will shut down after 5 minutes of idiling? Or are all freigtliner columbias like that from the factory. You have to engage the cruise control to rev the rpms up above normal idle for it to keep running if you want to stay cool.

 

It's a Freightliner thing, there was a Freightliner Columbia fuel tanker that was idling and shut off after 5 minutes. I do know the WIA model Volvos (97-98 models I think had them) shut down after 5 minutes if you don't have it on high idle.

 

Trucking companies have been using their drivers for years to finance their business-- in so many ways-- this is just 1 more. Most companies don't want you to even take a 34hr reset-- they want you available each and every day-- with just the hours you are picking up(from the old ways- before the 34hr restart existed)--- If you do restart-- then they don't to cover the fuel bill. Yes, I agree completely-- anyone who signs such a paper- should be running away from that company a.s.a.p. ( but, unfortunately- you've got to put yourself in that driver's position-- He's just quite a job- had a long bus ride to company X- the recruiter never said anything about such a form-- now he either signs it-- or catches another bus.)

The math just isn't going to work out for the driver- 24 hours in a day-- you can only drive 11 in a 14hour period-- that's only 45.8%-- the other none rolling time = 54.2% of which that 10hour break if idled continously will result in a 41.6% idle time.

APU's if your company doesn't have them on or planning on installing them-- they are either PLANNING ON going under-- or planning to stick it to the drivers.


Or perhaps, it's time to re- visit the old bunk house days of trucking.

Do away with the sleepers altogether-- saves money on cost of truck.
There's no more sleeper birth split anymore- so having one is of NO advantage to a company.

These big companies could buy some run-down Motel along the big road-- every 500 miles or so-- fix them up--- or more likely- Not fix them up--- gravel the vacant lot next door-- and presto--- Bunk house/ relay yard.

 

headborg wrote:
Nope its not going to work out for the driver. Even with ideal dispatches and assuming continuous idle during your 10hr break, and assuming you drive 11hrs...thats just under 50%. More often than not an average day will not be 11hrs...but the 10hr break still exists. This will increase the % even greater.

I agree with you here headborg. If they cannot afford to put the APUs on and wait for the return in investment, then that company is hanging by a thread.