User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 08-28-2007, 02:12 PM
Sheepdancer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bella Vista, Arkansas, United States
Posts: 1,408
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
"honestly", your lack of knowledge of the radio world is showing and is contained within the circumference of your steering wheel! You only know of "10 Meters" or "11 Meters" and ONLY because you saw them in some truck stop. When your "internet" is DOWN, your CELLPHONE doesn't WORK, and your computer is DEAD, those hams will still be on the air passing vital traffic into and out of disaster areas during hurricanes, fires, floods and other events. Ten Meters is a small part of the frequency resources allocated to hams! And, no, it will never be "opened up" to truckers or the CB crowd. It is an INTERNATIONAL allocation governed by treaties, and the USA is only ONE signatory to these agreements.
Im not a truck driver so you would be wrong. I have NEVER personally owned a CB nor seen a 10 meter or whatever in a truckstop. In fact my extensive experience with CB radios would come from 1974 when my dads new station wagon came with one and my little sister and me would sneak out to the garage, turn it on and say things like "POO POO" to truck drivers.
If a huge disaster happens and my power, internet and cell phones go out, I will be too busy shooting looters to worry about what some old guy is saying on a radio. Which also brings up the fact that since I like millions of other people, dont own a radio reciever with those bands..I wouldnt care or even think of what you could be possibly saying on it.
Again, your little hobby is most likely dying. Young people today just dont care about 1940's technology and speaking with 90 year old men sitting in their garages.

AGAIN....give those frequincies to the truck drivers, they have more important work to do than some radio hobbiest!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-28-2007, 02:21 PM
Sheepdancer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bella Vista, Arkansas, United States
Posts: 1,408
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Actually on the internet you dont get to hear distress calls at sea or listen to hams in other countries plead for assistance due to war or castatrophys or any number of things like transmissions from Everest or the radio room of the Queen Mary. And if your good at code you get to relay the message to mom and dad that their sons and daughters are safe in war zones or arrived safely at a distant duty station.
Distress calls at sea--- Why do I need to hear those? Unless the coast guard is giving me a paycheck, that sounds pretty boring.
Other countries pleading for assistance--- I see enough of that on late night infomercials.
Transmitions from everest--- I have the Discovory channel
Radio room from the queen mary--- YAWN zZzZzZz Snore.
Soldiers at war--- They now have internet access and cell phones during war. My good buddy has been in iraq for a long time now....he emails me at least twice a week and calls at least twice a month. He contacts his family ever more than that.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-28-2007, 04:15 PM
greg3564's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leander, TX
Posts: 1,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by century451
Actually on the internet you dont get to hear distress calls at sea or listen to hams in other countries plead for assistance due to war or castatrophys or any number of things like transmissions from Everest or the radio room of the Queen Mary. And if your good at code you get to relay the message to mom and dad that their sons and daughters are safe in war zones or arrived safely at a distant duty station.
Well there's much more advanced technology available to sailors, climbers on Everest, etc. Most of those people carry satellite phones now. I have to agree with sheepdancer that it's a dying hobby. But, if it's something you enjoy, keep doing it. :wink:
__________________
Check out the new 2008 Microsoft Streets and Trips! Sweet!

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:12 PM
century451's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sparta, MO
Posts: 202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

There may be more technology but what you fail to understand is all those things I mentioned. Those radio calls sometimes are the only link to survival and rescue.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:43 PM
Sheepdancer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bella Vista, Arkansas, United States
Posts: 1,408
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by century451
There may be more technology but what you fail to understand is all those things I mentioned. Those radio calls sometimes are the only link to survival and rescue.
Ok, if you are talking about "rescues" I could make the argument that truck drivers need to be rescued 1000 time more than people on Everest. So in reality, drivers have a more practical use for the 10 meters than anyone else.

Times change, technologies change. No need to hold on to your old ways.
Look at the UHF and VHF TV channels. In not too long Television stations will no longer be allowed to broadcast over them. Why? Because better technology has given us HDTV. Those frequincies will be then used for something else.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-28-2007, 06:53 PM
VitoCorleone99's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I don't think I've ever seen nor heard a ten meter radio, but this conversation could have easily replaced the 'perpetual smallness' discussion in Nerds In Paradise.

"It's simple. You take an asymptotic line, and extend it outward." :lol:
__________________
Reading this blog will make you smarter and/or more attractive.

(The preceding statement has not been evaluated by the FCC.)
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-28-2007, 07:47 PM
Useless's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,589
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioRay

NOPE! Your so-called "10 Meter 'amateur' radio is a chrome-faced CB radio for an illegal CB market and is noted as such on FCC's Office of Technology site!!!!!

Insist on talking on 28 Mhz, and you will pay the price eventually!

RR
:roll: :roll:
Yeah, like we've really been deluged with drivers who have been snagged on this one!!

Guess they are all too busy hammering out license plates to post here, though!!

:P
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-28-2007, 08:24 PM
Fredog's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 3,756
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Useless
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioRay

NOPE! Your so-called "10 Meter 'amateur' radio is a chrome-faced CB radio for an illegal CB market and is noted as such on FCC's Office of Technology site!!!!!

Insist on talking on 28 Mhz, and you will pay the price eventually!

RR
:roll: :roll:
Yeah, like we've really been deluged with drivers who have been snagged on this one!!

Guess they are all too busy hammering out license plates to post here, though!!

:P

You know, it's perfectly legal for a cb shop to sell a 10 meter radio to anyone, it's only illegal if it has been converted to get regular c b channels. even then. I'm not sure it's illegal to sell it. it's just illegal to use it without a license, I will look it up in the nerd law book next chance I get
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-28-2007, 09:44 PM
century451's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sparta, MO
Posts: 202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Well Sheepdancer I could care less about CB, or illegal truck driver transmissions. The only time it will get my attention is when it interferes with my enjoyment of a hobby That I legally am licenced to do. As long as it doesnt step on my transmissions or interferes with a conversation I am having I could care less.

What you people are saying is use it or lose it. Give the spectrum to truck drivers that will utilize it right?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-28-2007, 09:47 PM
RadioRay's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Incorrect.

,,,,,,,,,,,snipped for brevity Note the following statement (quote): "IMPORTATION AND MARKETING INTO/WITHIN {THE UNITED STATES} IS
ILLEGAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(B) OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT AND SECTION2.803 OF THE RULES.
.


In view of the foregoing, the following "10-meter" transceivers are not acceptable for importation or marketing into/within the United States. Importation and marketing of these units is illegal pursuant to Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803 of the rules. Willful violations of the Rules and the Act may subject the violator to a monetary forfeiture of not more than $11,000 for each violation or each day of a continuing violation. The Commission continues to review this type of equipment, and additional makes and models may be added to this list in the future.

LIST OF TRANSCEIVERS

ILLEGAL TO IMPORT OR MARKET



NOTE FROM QTH.COM: This list was modified to include additional radios. Radios that were added are displayed with a hotlink to the documentation and/or reason for the addition
CONNEX - models: 3300, 3300 HP, 3300HP-ZX, 3300 PLUS, CX-3800, 4400, 4400 HP and 4800 DXL

GALAXY - models: DX33HML, DX44V, DX45MP, DX48T, DX55V, DX66V, DX73V, DX77HML, DX88HL, DX93T, DX95T, DX99V, DX2517, DX2527, Melaka, Saturn and Saturn Turbo

GENERAL - Grant, Stonewall Jackson, Lee, Washington

MAGNUM - models: 257, 357DX, Alpha force, Delta Force, Mini, S-3,

MIRAGE - models: 33HP, 44, 88, 99, 2950, 2950EX, 2970, 6600, 9900

NORTH STAR - models: NS-3000 and NS-9000

PRESIDENT - models: Grant, J.F.K., Jackson, Lincoln, HR-2510 and HR-2600

PRO STAR - model: 240

RANGER - models: AR-3500, RCI-2950, RCI-2950-DX (see below) and RCI-2970, RCI-6300, RCI-6300 Turbo, RCI-6900, RCI-6900 Turbo

RCI - model: RG-99

SUPERSTAR - model: 121, 3700, 3900, 3900 HP G, 3900 Gold, 4800, Grant

TEK - model: HR-3950

UNIDEN - models: HR-2510 and HR-2600

VIRAGE - model: 3300, 3300 HP, VX-38, VX-39,

For further information concerning the listed transceivers or similar models, contact Ray LaForge or Gary Hendrickson at the FCC Laboratory, 7435 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046, (301) 362-3041 or (301) 362-3043 respectively, or E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]

Footnote: The Cobra 150 and 200 "export" radios, tho not on this version of the list, have been added along with certain "Stryker" models. IOW, if they have "bands" of 'channels', it indicates use on the CB band and likely is illegal to sell as well.[/i][/u]

Dealers such as Radioactive Radios, GI Joe's, David Pace, Pilot Travel Centers, Pro Class CB, Striker CB Shop, Hi Tech, Racoon's CB Shop, RP Communications, Ramko Distributors ($150,000 fine!) and a large list of OTHER dealers have been fined. Pilot settled their action for $90,000 and it was posted on the internet for all to see.

CBers have actually received HIGHER fines than the hams that 'operate allegedly illegally on 75 Meters. Like:

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) )

In the Matter of ) File Number: EB-05-HU-045

Marcus A. Roberts )

NAL/Acct. No.: 200732540001 Houston, Texas )

FRN: 0004307195 ) )

NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE

Released: January 3, 2007 By the Resident Agent, Houston Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau: I.

INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Marcus A. Roberts apparently willfully violated Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), by operating an unlicensed radio transmitter. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Act, that Mr. Roberts is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. In response to a complaint of interference to household electronic equipment, on April 28, 2006, the Commission's Houston Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Houston Office") issued Mr. Roberts a warning letter advising him that operation of Citizens Band ("CB") radio equipment with greater power than authorized in the Commission's Rules ("Rules") voids the authority to operate the station and is therefore considered unlicensed operation. The letter further advised that unlicensed operation is a violation of Section 301 of the Act, and could subject the operator to penalties including monetary fines. 3. On September 28, 2006, in response to another complaint of interference, agents from the Houston Office inspected the CB station located at Mr. Roberts' residence. During testing of Mr. Roberts' equipment, the agents determined that his CB station was producing the maximum power authorized in the Rules for CB radio stations. The agents verbally warned Mr. Roberts that any operation of his CB radio station with more power than observed during this inspection would be a violation of the Rules. The agents then inspected a CB radio station installed in Mr. Roberts' vehicle. The CB radio station in the vehicle included a CB transmitter and two linear amplifiers. The linear amplifiers observed had the capability to boost the power of the station to several hundred times the authorized power level. Mr. Roberts admitted to operating the amplifiers and exceeding the authorized power limit; but claimed that he only used this equipment outside the neighborhood. The agents again verbally warned Mr. Roberts that the use of linear amplifiers or any device that creates a power greater than the authorized limit is strictly prohibited by the Rules and voids the authority to operate the CB station. 4. On November 8, 2006, an agent with the Houston Office located the source of a strong signal on a CB radio channel using direction finding methods to Mr. Roberts' residence. The agent recognized the voice of the transmissions to be that of Mr. Roberts. The complainant contacted the agent by telephone to report that Mr. Roberts' transmissions ...............................

snipped)

see www.fcc.gov/eb for details

OR

Mr Timothy Fullen.

WARNED to cease his illegal activities

Or................................................ .................................................. .

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 )
In the Matter of ) Donald Winton )
File Number: EB-07-HU-007 Licensee of Citizen Band Radio )
NAL/Acct. No.: 200732540003 Station ) FRN: 0016201386 Corpus Christi, Texas ) )
NOTICE OF APPARENT LIABILITY FOR FORFEITURE
Released: April 23, 2007 By the Resident Agent,
Houston Office, South Central Region, Enforcement Bureau:

I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture ("NAL"), we find that Donald Winton, licensee of a Citizen Band ("CB") radio station, in Corpus Christi, Texas, apparently willfully violated Section 95.426(a) of the Commission's Rules ("Rules") by failing to make his CB radio station available for inspection. We conclude, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act"), that Mr. Winton is apparently liable for a forfeiture in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000). II. BACKGROUND 2. On February 21, 2007, in response to a complaint that a CB radio station in Corpus Christi, Texas was jamming communications on CB channel 19 by continually re-broadcasting the programming of a local AM broadcast station, an agent from the Commission's Houston Office of the Enforcement Bureau ("Houston Office") monitored communications on CB channel 19 in the Corpus Christi area. The agent observed a radio signal on CB channel 19 re-broadcasting the programming of a local AM broadcast station; and using radio direction finding techniques determined that the signal originated from an antenna mounted on a house in Corpus Christi, Texas. 3. Still on February 21, 2007, while the agent was making measurements on the radio signal from the CB radio station, Donald Winton exited the house and walked down the driveway. The agent introduced himself as an FCC agent, and requested to inspect the CB radio station inside the house. Mr. Winton confirmed this location was his residence and that the CB station belonged to him, but refused to make the station available for inspection. The agent advised Mr. Winton that the Commission's Rules require the operator of a CB radio station to make the station available for inspection. Mr. Winton still refused to make the station available for inspection. The agent then requested that Mr. Winton go inside and take the station off the air because it was blocking communications on CB radio channel 19. Mr. Winton walked into the house and the station's transmissions ceased. Mr. Winton returned and continued to refuse to make the station available for inspection, so the agent left the area. III. DISCUSSION 4. Section 503(b) of the Act provides that any person who willfully or repeatedly fails to comply substantially with the terms and conditions of any license, or willfully or repeatedly fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation or order issued by the Commission thereunder, shall be liable for a forfeiture penalty. The term "willful" as used in Section 503(b) has been interpreted to mean simply that the acts or omissions are committed knowingly. 5. Section 95.426(a) requires that if an authorized FCC representative requests to inspect your CB station, you must make your station and records available for inspection. Mr. Winton admitted to an agent from the Houston Office that he had a CB radio station within his residence. In addition, Mr. Winton demonstrated he had access to and control of the station by entering his residence and turning the transmitter off, while the agent waited outside. On February 21, 2007, in response to several requests by agent to inspect his station, Mr. Winton refused to make his CB station available for inspection. 6. Based on the evidence before us, we find that Mr. Winton apparently willfully violated Sections 95.426(a) of the Rules by failing to make his CB radio station available for inspection. 7. Pursuant to The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment of Section 1.80 of the Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines, ("Forfeiture Policy Statement"), and Section 1.80 of the Rules, the base forfeiture amount for failing to permit inspection is $7,000. In assessing the monetary forfeiture amount, we must also take into account the statutory factors set forth in Section 503(b)(2)(E) of the Act, which include the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violations, and with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, and history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other such matters as justice may require.
Applying the Forfeiture Policy Statement, Section 1.80, and the statutory factors to the instant case, we conclude that Donald Winton is apparently liable for a $7,000 forfeiture. IV. ORDERING CLAUSES 8. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 503(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Sections 0.111, 0.311, 0.314 and 1.80 of the Commission's Rules, Donald Winton is hereby NOTIFIED of this APPARENT LIABILITY FOR A FORFEITURE in the amount of seven thousand dollars ($7,000) for violations of Sections 95.426(a) of the Rules. 9. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Section 1.80 of the Commission's Rules within thirty days of the release date of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, Donald Winton SHALL PAY the full amount of the proposed forfeiture or SHALL FILE a written statement seeking reduction or cancellation of the proposed forfeiture. 10. Payment of the forfeiture must be made by check or similar instrument, payable to the order of the Federal Communications Commission. The payment must include the NAL/Acct. No. and FRN No. referenced above. Payment by check or money order may be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, P.O. Box 358340, Pittsburgh, PA 15251-8340. Payment by overnight mail may be sent to Mellon Bank /LB 358340, 500 Ross Street, Room 1540670, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. Payment by wire transfer may be made to ABA Number 043000261, receiving bank Mellon Bank, and account number 911-6106. 11. The response, if any, must be mailed to Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, South Central Region, Houston Office, 9597 Jones Road, # 362, Houston, Texas, 77065 and must include the NAL/Acct. No. referenced in the caption. 12. The Commission will not consider reducing or canceling a forfeiture in response to a claim of inability to pay unless the petitioner submits: (1) federal tax returns for the most recent three-year period; (2) financial statements prepared according to generally accepted accounting practices ("GAAP"); or (3) some other reliable and objective documentation that accurately reflects the petitioner's current financial status. Any claim of inability to pay must specifically identify the basis for the claim by reference to the financial documentation submitted. 13. Requests for payment of the full amount of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture under an installment plan should be sent to: Associate Managing Director, Financial Operations, 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1A625, Washington, D.C. 20554.^8 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture shall be sent by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, and regular mail, to Donald Winton at his address of record. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


OR................................................ ...............................


June 1, 2006
Hugh H. Horne
1725 Holston Drive
Bristol, TN 37620


Subject: Warning Notice--Unlicensed Radio Operation
Dear Mr. Horne:

Information before the Commission indicates that you have been operating radio equipment without a license on 27.465, 27.555, 27.575, 27.585, 27.615 and 27.895 MHz. Those transmissions are causing interference to licensed stations in the 10-meter amateur band.

Please be advised that operation of radio transmitting equipment without a license is a violation of Section 301 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. Section 301, and will subject you to fine or imprisonment, as well as an in rem seizure of any non-certified radio transmitting equipment, in cooperation with the United States Attorney for your jurisdiction. Monetary forfeitures normally range from $7,500 to $10,000.


You are requested to contact me at 717-338-2502 to discuss this matter.

cc: FCC South Central Regional Director

Stephen P. Lee Resident Agent, Houston Office South Central Region Enforcement Bureau 47 C.F.R. S 95.426(a). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b). Section 312(f)(1) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. S 312(f)(1), which applies to violations for which forfeitures are assessed under Section 503(b) of the Act, provides that "[t]he term 'willful', when used with reference to the commission or omission of any act, means the conscious and deliberate commission or omission of such act, irrespective of any intent to violate any provision of this Act or any rule or regulation of the Commission authorized by this Act...." See Southern California Broadcasting Co., 6 FCC Rcd 4387 (1991). 47 C.F.R. S 95.426(a) 12 FCC Rcd 17087 (1997), recon. denied, 15 FCC Rcd 303 (1999); 47 C.F.R. S1.80. 47 U.S.C. S 503(b)(2)(E). 47 U.S.C. S 503(b), 47 C.F.R. SS 0.111, 0.311, 0.314, 1.80, 95.426(a). ^8 See 47 C.F.R. S 1.1914. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission 3 Federal Communications Commission

And the list goes on a LOT further. Lately, more actual FINES to CBers than hams.


Again, this thread was supposed to address ONE issue, not argue hams vs CBers. The use of 10 Meters by unlicensed operators is illegal and can result in fines. The use of warnings and citations is the first resort. Most of the time, this is sufficient as the intent is to simply get the unlicensed operators OFF the 10 meter band where they have NO business. It doesn't mean that you can simply IGNORE those warnings and think nothing else will happen. THAT is how some of those CBers above got popped for 10,000 bucks; they thought the feds wouldn't come after them again. They DID! :shock:

The objective is still to get truckers to stay OFF bands for which they have no license or authorization. Anyone is more than welcome to obtain the proper license and operate within the rules of amateur service. Once that is done, there is NO quarrel with anyone so long as you obey the rules. Operate your CB ON the CB band. THat's all!


RR
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:25 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.