[golfhobo]

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago

So, where does it say "was known"? :roll:

From 395.2: .......none of which were apparent on the basis of information known to the person dispatching the run at the time it was begun.

[Rev.Vassago]

Originally Posted by golfhobo

From 395.2: .......none of which were apparent on the basis of information known to the person dispatching the run at the time it was begun.

I repeat:

Where does it say "was known"? :roll:

[golfhobo]

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago

I repeat:

Where does it say "was known"? :roll:

You're RIGHT, Rev! I added the word "was" to differentiate from "should have."

The past tense word KNOWN stands alone as all the verification needed for my interpretation of the regs.

I don't have the time or patience to teach you Englilsh Comprehension. I'm through with this discussion because, as you said, enuff was said last week.

You can take the exception or not, as you please. But, you have said nothing to change my comprehension of the regulations.

I'll leave it to the others to take what they want from this "discussion."

time for me to go OTR again! C'ra!!

[Rev.Vassago]

Originally Posted by golfhobo

You're RIGHT, Rev! I added the word "was" to differentiate from "should have."

The past tense word KNOWN stands alone as all the verification needed for my interpretation of the regs.

I don't have the time or patience to teach you Englilsh Comprehension. I'm through with this discussion because, as you said, enuff was said last week.

You can take the exception or not, as you please. But, you have said nothing to change my comprehension of the regulations.

I'll leave it to the others to take what they want from this "discussion."

time for me to go OTR again! C'ra!!

Plain and simple. It doesn't say "was known", but it does say "should have known".