User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 03-20-2011, 01:31 AM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

This week was a bit different. I set my cruise at 65mph (1,325rpm) for the entire trip. The wind was calm and not much stop-n-go this week. I avg'd 7.25 loaded and empty both ways. The truck ran smoother, I was able to stay ahead of most company trucks (JB, SNI, Werner, US EX) and made average time.

I think this is where I'm going to run the truck at for the next few months and start doing my upgrades...... first will be a 3 axle alignment to see if it makes a difference (plus who knows if it has ever been done) then I'm going to get the new mufflers, then have the overhead ran. After that, I'm going to try a few other things such as a ECM tune and a few online things I have read for the C13.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-20-2011, 03:46 PM
solo379's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

The good rule of a tumb;-If it's not broken, don't fix it! Of course i didn't mean scheduled maintenance intervals....
__________________
Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-21-2011, 02:17 AM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
The good rule of a tumb;-If it's not broken, don't fix it! Of course i didn't mean scheduled maintenance intervals....
I know what you mean, but the mufflers have 520k on them now, the overhead should be done every year along with a 3-axle alignment. If I do a ECM upgrade, it won't be for at least a year, and the rest I am still 'iffy about.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-21-2011, 02:28 AM
solo379's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I'm very particular, where i do alignment, and overhead. And definitely wouldn't mess with ECM unless i have to....
__________________
Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-21-2011, 09:20 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by solo379 View Post
I'm very particular, where i do alignment, and overhead. And definitely wouldn't mess with ECM unless i have to....
I have my alignment done at the local Goodyear dealer and my overhead will be done at Great Lakes Peterbilt
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-03-2011, 01:59 AM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Just an update....I have been averaging 7.25mpg with the truck and am not very happy. I honestly thought it would do better since I run empty everywhere I go, and I keep it under 65mph.

That being said, today I did a mod I heard about with the fuel wire, and also my boost wire going to the ECM. The truck deff idles much smoother, and the throttle response is great. I don't think i will gain any MPG yet, but I will check it out on this weeks run.

Next weekend I am removing the resionator/convertor and putting in a piece of straight pipe, thus eliminating one issue. I have been told that I should gain about .3mpg with that, then going to replace the mufflers on the back with some Donaldson high flows and see how she does. If i can even gain .5mpg total I will be very happy!!!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-03-2011, 01:33 PM
Maniac's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,092
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy View Post
Just an update....I have been averaging 7.25mpg with the truck and am not very happy. I honestly thought it would do better since I run empty everywhere I go, and I keep it under 65mph.

That being said, today I did a mod I heard about with the fuel wire, and also my boost wire going to the ECM. The truck deff idles much smoother, and the throttle response is great. I don't think i will gain any MPG yet, but I will check it out on this weeks run.




Next weekend I am removing the resionator/convertor and putting in a piece of straight pipe, thus eliminating one issue. I have been told that I should gain about .3mpg with that, then going to replace the mufflers on the back with some Donaldson high flows and see how she does. If i can even gain .5mpg total I will be very happy!!!
You are getting about all you will ever see with a Cat, just how it is, the Cats are NOT fuel mileage engines,never were, just ask anybody that has one,

Also notice most big fleets didn't use Cats,even when they were available, there is a reason and fuel mileage is the biggest one.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 04-03-2011, 03:07 PM
rank's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac View Post
You are getting about all you will ever see with a Cat, just how it is, the Cats are NOT fuel mileage engines,never were, just ask anybody that has one.
True.....but I've never pulled 4500 lbs with it either so I wouldn't know. OMG that is light. Seems like overkill to me. I bet my little M11 would get 9 mpg on that run.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 04-03-2011, 08:50 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rank View Post
True.....but I've never pulled 4500 lbs with it either so I wouldn't know. OMG that is light. Seems like overkill to me. I bet my little M11 would get 9 mpg on that run.
I bet it would too!!!! I went with the C13 hoping it would help out a bit, and it deff is better than a C15 would have been.

As for being light, I love it till winter comes around. Then it is a nightmare to deal with. Heck, even on a dry day I lock up the trailer tandems just rolling at 25mph and stopping. Scares the carp out of the 4 wheelers if I have to brake quick on the interstate. All that smoke tends to make them go for the median LOL

Last edited by Steel Horse Cowboy; 04-03-2011 at 08:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 04-03-2011, 08:53 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac View Post
You are getting about all you will ever see with a Cat, just how it is, the Cats are NOT fuel mileage engines,never were, just ask anybody that has one,

Also notice most big fleets didn't use Cats,even when they were available, there is a reason and fuel mileage is the biggest one.
I'm not so sure, there are a few guys I run with who have 05-06 C15's in W9's and with the resionator removed and donaldson mufflers that are getting 7.5-8mpg pulling liquid tanks heavier than me.

I'm just kicking myself in the ass for getting rid of my old trusty FLD. I should have just spent the $2000 on the clutch and hit the road, but as usual, I had to make an impulse buy LOL
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.