Need advice on buying a reefer
#11
You can get decent 2005 and 2006 53' reefers with 7k to 10k hours on them for $23k - $30k (depending on options) if you shop arround. Don't buy junk that you will later regret.
__________________
"The Breakfast of Champions isn't cereal, it's the competition!" - "Success is how high you bounce when you hit bottom." - "An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."
#12
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 16
I didn't know CA had a rear restriction what year a reefer could be what is it?
#13
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 16
Your write glad I came here first before i made a move
#15
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 139
I was @ a dealer in Olive branch, MS the other week and i was told they have some good deals on 2004 less than 20k. Only thing is the unit has alot of hours as it was used by a team outfit. if all checks out well i may purchase one myself.
#16
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,154
These are age related problems. All reefers will develop them eventually but a '99 would almost surely be in better shape than a '90. I just traded in a '98 that was still reasonably solid, but you could tell the insulation had degraded quite a bit and there were soft spots starting to show up in the floor. If you're going to run regionally, you can get by with older equipment that is well maintained. If you're going to run coast to coast it becomes a much bigger gamble. It doesn't sound like you have reefer experience. Tread carefully, the liability risk is much greater.
#17
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 16
These are age related problems. All reefers will develop them eventually but a '99 would almost surely be in better shape than a '90. I just traded in a '98 that was still reasonably solid, but you could tell the insulation had degraded quite a bit and there were soft spots starting to show up in the floor. If you're going to run regionally, you can get by with older equipment that is well maintained. If you're going to run coast to coast it becomes a much bigger gamble. It doesn't sound like you have reefer experience. Tread carefully, the liability risk is much greater.
#19
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 19
Personally I will never own a refer larger than 48' . The problem w/ shippers is . They need to educated on the difference. Example 44,000# load cannot be loaded past the
48' mark so your hauling around an extra 8' or around 2500# for nothing. If by some SMALL chance thier load is 26 boards @ 44k turn them side ways in a 48 and they fit just fine and tight is better than loose for refer fuel usage. ( the cool or frozen product holds it temp better tight). BTW in the last 30yrs allmost all loads I've in a refer are 18 to 19 boards. In my opinion a 53' is only good as a flat bed or dry van.
#20
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,154
Personally I will never own a refer larger than 48' . The problem w/ shippers is . They need to educated on the difference. Example 44,000# load cannot be loaded past the
48' mark so your hauling around an extra 8' or around 2500# for nothing. If by some SMALL chance thier load is 26 boards @ 44k turn them side ways in a 48 and they fit just fine and tight is better than loose for refer fuel usage. ( the cool or frozen product holds it temp better tight). BTW in the last 30yrs allmost all loads I've in a refer are 18 to 19 boards. In my opinion a 53' is only good as a flat bed or dry van. |

