Why did Cat leave the business?

Thread Tools
  #51  
Old 12-31-2009, 03:35 PM
Default

I'll take my mechanics word over yours thank you. He worked for Caterpillar for 25 years and could probably rebuild it in his sleep. His work on my truck so far has been top notch and reasonably priced. If something breaks I try to limp back home if possible so he'll fix it. I have spoke with other people who feel the same about his work ethic and the job he does. He's more than qualified, and is not "shady service."

Matter of fact, Buffalo Peterbilt tried to tell me I need plungers and barrels when I had them look at a fuel leak on the fuel pump, which I think they wanted 1000.00 to do. Well, that was BS, I limped it home to my mechanic and all it needed was o-rings.

An honest mechanic and an honest plumber are hard to find. I actually have both. :thumbsup:
It doesnt matter how good your mechanic is, parts run over 10K for a real overhaul even if he does it for free.
 
  #52  
Old 12-31-2009, 03:38 PM
Default

I fail to see why you give a crap what anybody else has.
Where did you get that at?

I can give a rats ass what you have, its not costing me anything.


Originally Posted by Fredog
if I prefer a cat engine, how does that affect you?
It doesn't, I DON'T CARE.

Where did you get the notion that i DO care? I just said that I dont see the point of owning something that costs more.
 
  #53  
Old 12-31-2009, 03:41 PM
Default

Cheaper is not always better.

You get what you pay for, I've only had 4 trucks in 33 years, all Cats, all went over 1 million miles all never in framed, 2 are still going today.

Why fix something that isn't broke.
But Maniac, there are people with Detroits saying the same, as well as Cummings. Now if that was a trend then i would understand, but since it isnt i still fail to see the point.

If CAT was so darn good they would never leave the business. Mercedes-Benz will always be around even tough it much more expensive to own it, market is still there, emissions or not. Good things last forever, CAt seems to have fallen out with that concept for some reason, least of it being the emissions....
 

Last edited by Dejanh; 12-31-2009 at 03:43 PM.
  #54  
Old 01-01-2010, 12:47 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,303
Default

Originally Posted by Dejanh
It doesnt matter how good your mechanic is, parts run over 10K for a real overhaul even if he does it for free.
and your wrong......... like I said I'll take his word over yours. Damn dude, listen not talk.
 
  #55  
Old 01-01-2010, 01:03 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

You need to do some checking around if you have been quoted $10,000 for only parts. That is way too high. As I stated earler parts to do an inframe on my CAT were going to cost me around $5,000. Detroit and Cummins should be less.
 
  #56  
Old 01-01-2010, 01:22 AM
Default

You need to do some checking around if you have been quoted $10,000 for only parts. That is way too high. As I stated earler parts to do an inframe on my CAT were going to cost me around $5,000. Detroit and Cummins should be less.
I am not only talking about upper part of the engine. Quotes that Detroit gave me were for a complete rebuilt of my series 60 which included injectors and a turbo, oil pump,etc..

Detroit Diesel Series 60 Engine Rebuild Kit
Here is KIT that costs $2288, half of what both of you have stated.

I can half ass rebuilt mine for 7000, thats no problem, but with aftermarket parts. Genuine parts are not the ones pictured above as the same parts in Detroit cost almost 8K. That is only half the rebuilt. CAT parts are right there with it also. I have also checked with friend of mine for his Red Top Cummings and it comes out almost identical to my DD60. Difference in parts is what the price of mine and yours is all about.

http://detroitdieselstepup.com/stepupcompetitive.asp
 

Last edited by Dejanh; 01-01-2010 at 01:46 AM.
  #57  
Old 01-01-2010, 02:05 AM
Fredog's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 3,756
Default

Originally Posted by Dejanh
Where did you get that at?

I can give a rats ass what you have, its not costing me anything.



It doesn't, I DON'T CARE.

Where did you get the notion that i DO care? I just said that I dont see the point of owning something that costs more.
I got that idea when you said that you are glad they are out of business, thus implying that you dont want anyone to be able to buy one
 
  #58  
Old 01-01-2010, 02:06 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,303
Default

I'm not talking about injectors, turbos and oil pumps. That's where we're getting some confusion I think. Unless they need changed at the time of a rebuild why change them out? Your spending money you don't have to.

Happy New Year guys.
 
  #59  
Old 01-01-2010, 02:52 AM
Maniac's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Northeast
Posts: 1,092
Default

If CAT was so darn good they would never leave the business.



Don't you even read what you write they LEFT the buisness on their own accord, they don't want to deal with it any more, they are tired of hearing people like you saying what a BAD product it is, and how expensive it is.

They would rather NOT make the $$$ than get the bad press, kind of like a mechanic who won't do a cheap repair because you don't want to spend the money to do it right, ever had that happen? I've seen it many times.

They have a solid niche in the dirt buisness, they DO NOT need our buisness.

Do a google search on the topic it is all in black and white, Cat engineers believe you can't make the emissions any better without hurting the reliabililty of the engine.

Cummins and Detroit know this also, but apparently don't care about reliability, why should they, mostly big fleets buy them, and trade them off if they become too costly to keep, something that is harder for one truck operators to do.

Why not look into the reliability of the so called new clean burn engines, you might be surprised.
 
  #60  
Old 01-01-2010, 03:18 AM
Default

Don't you even read what you write they LEFT the buisness on their own accord, they don't want to deal with it any more, they are tired of hearing people like you saying what a BAD product it is, and how expensive it is.
I've never said they were a bad engine, its just that they cost more compared to others which run just as good. CAT is a good engine, no doubt about it.

Originally Posted by Maniac
They would rather NOT make the $$$ than get the bad press, kind of like a mechanic who won't do a cheap repair because you don't want to spend the money to do it right, ever had that happen? I've seen it many times.
I've seen that happen YES.
I doubt tough that they dont want to make money. I do not think that everything what has been said about why they are leaving is correct.

Originally Posted by Maniac
They have a solid niche in the dirt business, they DO NOT need our business.
They need any business that they can get their hands on. They have been hit pretty bad with this recession and no one can tell me that they don't need more business.

Originally Posted by Maniac
Do a Google search on the topic it is all in black and white, Cat engineers believe you can't make the emissions any better without hurting the reliability of the engine.
Thats where innovation comes in. They have been riding a tide for a long time and when it comes time for them to make new technologies they just quit. You don't just quit, you get better.
If all engine manufacturers followed Cats ever so righteous example, you wouldn't have any trucks on the road and this country would come to a stand still. They refuse to adapt to these very challenging times and the world in which environment actually matters.

Originally Posted by Maniac
Cummings and Detroit know this also, but apparently don't care about reliability, why should they, mostly big fleets buy them, and trade them off if they become too costly to keep, something that is harder for one truck operators to do.
Most of the truck operators that i know bought these used trucks and are working with em just fine. Not everyone can be like you and me and go out and purchase a brand new one. You make it sound that these trucks are dead meat after the fleets trade them in.
Cummings and Detroit have a reputation that i don't have to even speak about. Cummings RED TOP is the best engine EVER built on this planet and i have experience to show for it. By you pretty much putting them in the category of the ,,bottom feeders'' i think, it damages your reputation as you are not correct, and you know it. All of my money has been made with these engines and i am doing pretty darn good.

Originally Posted by Maniac
Why not look into the reliability of the so called new clean burn engines, you might be surprised.
It is still early to try and dis credit everything these guys are doing. These technologies are young and will get better. First cars and airplanes were also bad but have gotten better with time. CAT will come back in this business but only when Detroit or these others invent something better that CAT can live with. In nature its called parasitism.

At least i have something to look at and compared it to.
 

Last edited by Dejanh; 01-01-2010 at 03:26 AM.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 04:23 AM.

Top