User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 05-08-2008, 04:05 AM
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long gone from here
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I really don't care too much about FSC. For me it is the rate that matters....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-08-2008, 04:12 AM
rank's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I went back and looked at May of '07. Average was $3.41 (4,000 loaded miles). So far in May this year it's $4.46 on 1500 miles. But yeah fuel is up $.30/mile.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-2008, 04:33 AM
DD60's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockwall,Tx
Posts: 477
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDiesel
I really don't care too much about FSC. For me it is the rate that matters....



Exactly. Who cares if a load paying 2.75pm doesn't include a FSC as compared to a load paying 1.45 with a .54 FSC.
__________________
Keep right,Pass left
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-08-2008, 12:51 PM
rank's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DD60
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDiesel
I really don't care too much about FSC. For me it is the rate that matters....



Exactly. Who cares if a load paying 2.75pm doesn't include a FSC as compared to a load paying 1.45 with a .54 FSC.
I care. I would rather see it broken out. Why? Because in 3 months time when fuel is up 10% you can go to the shipper and show them the broker isn't passing on the 10% increase that the shipper has paid. That will really pi$$ a shipper off.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-08-2008, 06:31 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long gone from here
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rank
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD60
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDiesel
I really don't care too much about FSC. For me it is the rate that matters....



Exactly. Who cares if a load paying 2.75pm doesn't include a FSC as compared to a load paying 1.45 with a .54 FSC.
I care. I would rather see it broken out. Why? Because in 3 months time when fuel is up 10% you can go to the shipper and show them the broker isn't passing on the 10% increase that the shipper has paid. That will really pi$$ a shipper off.
If this feel good legislation called the TRUCC act passes, you will not have to worry about the breakout of the FSC, because the FSC will go away...........................
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-08-2008, 10:33 PM
no_worries's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I think what Solo was saying is that any increase is probably due to fuel going up (increase in FSC) not the base rate which would reflect an actual change in supply/demand. If gross rates are up $.20 who cares? That simply covers the increase in diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-09-2008, 12:59 AM
rank's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDiesel
Quote:
Originally Posted by rank
Quote:
Originally Posted by DD60
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDiesel
I really don't care too much about FSC. For me it is the rate that matters....



Exactly. Who cares if a load paying 2.75pm doesn't include a FSC as compared to a load paying 1.45 with a .54 FSC.
I care. I would rather see it broken out. Why? Because in 3 months time when fuel is up 10% you can go to the shipper and show them the broker isn't passing on the 10% increase that the shipper has paid. That will really pi$$ a shipper off.
If this feel good legislation called the TRUCC act passes, you will not have to worry about the breakout of the FSC, because the FSC will go away...........................
Why?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-09-2008, 02:50 AM
no_worries's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

How do you think a shipper is going to react to the idea of an annual freight bid that doesn't include a FSC? I suppose if the bid is low...good luck getting a truck.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-10-2008, 09:49 PM
solo379's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by no_worries
I think what Solo was saying is that any increase is probably due to fuel going up (increase in FSC) not the base rate which would reflect an actual change in supply/demand.
Exactly! 8) It's always a pleasure talking to you. Great minds, think alike! :lol: :wink:
__________________
Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-10-2008, 10:57 PM
no_worries's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,154
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Common sense...the universal language :wink: :lol:
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.