7.9 MPG.....
#21
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
A tank would have less resistance then a dry van, that I do know. How much? Well if I had a multi-million dollar wind tunnel I'd tell you!
What I do know is that for an aero truck pulling a dry van, one third of the aero resistance is due to the square ass end of the van.
#23
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 710
Raafi...drop it to 62 mph for a month and see what your avg mpg is. The beauty is that you can always speed back up if you don't like running that slow. But check it out for a month...I'd be interested to see what your mileage improves to.
#26
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 710
Hey Raafi...
Take it as a challange for 1 month...yep just one measly month and then you can go back to that 70 mph you so love. In fact make a bet to yourself that you can do it and the prize is to take the savings from the one month and buy some toy with it. Now THAT puts it in a different light eh? Come on ....do it , I dare ya
#27
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by person
http://www.airtab.com/ What about these for the tractor?
Thanks Brad
#29
Board Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 258
Originally Posted by Fisherman
Originally Posted by person
http://www.airtab.com/ What about these for the tractor?
Thanks Brad
#30
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
I've seen wind tunnel testing concluding they did very little.
But many do claim being able to see better behind you in a rainstorm. And less rocking in the wind, when trucks pass you, etc.. |

