Healthcare Statistics
#1
Some Canadian doctor ????? did an article on AOL regarding how good their health care was. He denied that there were long waits, delays for tests, etc. What a crock. Look at these statistics:
A recent Investor's Business Daily article provided some interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization. % Men & Women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis U.S. 65% England46% Canada42% % Patients diagnosed with Diabetes who received treatment within six months: U.S.93% England15% Canada43% % Seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months: U.S.90% England15% Canada43% % referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month: U.S.77% England40% Canada43% Number of MRI Scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per Million people U.S.71 England14 Canada 18 % of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health" U.S.12% England 2% Canada 6% I don't know about you but I can't wait for "Universal Healthcare" ? It this what we want?
#2
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FT ST JOHN
Posts: 649
The Canadian system may not be perfect but all things considered, pretty good. I'm no expert on the subject but those who are rank the U.S. system way behind some 3 world countries, something like 82nd...
But the U.S. system scores # 1 in one department, COST. Your paying about a trillion more per year than the top ranked health care in the world yet not everyone is covered, that boggles the mind. Statistics and phony e.mails etc. are flying around as this is a heated subject, don't believe all the propaganda, the people skimming that extra trillion have alot to lose. One more stat I found that should make you think... On July 17, 2007, Professor Elizabeth Warren from the Harvard Law School testified before the House Committee on the Judiciary that rising health care costs are linked to increased bankruptcy rates among the middle-class. She states that since 2000, “an estimated five million families have filed for bankruptcy in the aftermath of serious medical problems. The current health care finance system is bankrupting hard-working, play-by-the-rules American families.” Read more: Medical Bankruptcy Epidemic: Health Care Costs Trigger Half of All Personal Bankruptcies in U.S. | Suite101.com
#3
BANNED
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 801
Mike, i have had a chance to visit a foreign doctor many times over back in Europe where they have universal care, and i can tell you first hand that there were no waits and that i was taken cared of in timely and profesional manner.
No one ever died in a emergency room there waiting for a care...every now and then someone, somewhere seems to pass away here.... People are scared of the unknown and that is reasonable, BUT, when you have money to pay for these overbloated military programs, wars and bases on every continent on this earth, universal health care is just a drop in a bucket compared to it. Canada is one of the most wealthy nations on this earth, I have been there many times and have many friends living there. No one ever complains about the quality health care, they have everything we have here its just that they pay alot less for it. All insurance companies are a fraud, just like banks and even though its a trillion dollar buisiness they are still getting bailed out by US(me and you), yet give us no service in return. Insurance companies refuse to insure those who have pre-existing medical condition. Why, because they can, just like the banks can take our deposits, invest it in a stock market, piss it away then get more money from our government to make up those loses......They are a burden on our society and unless we stand up for ourselves we will never fix this problem. Standing up against a trillion dollar machine is very hard, very hard indeed. Last edited by Dejanh; 08-15-2009 at 02:34 AM.
#4
All insurance companies are a fraud, just like banks and even though its a trillion dollar buisiness they are still getting bailed out by US(me and you), yet give us no service in return. Insurance companies refuse to insure those who have pre-existing medical condition. Why, because they can, just like the banks can take our deposits, invest it in a stock market, piss it away then get more money from our government to make up those loses......They are a burden on our society and unless we stand up for ourselves we will never fix this problem. Standing up against a trillion dollar machine is very hard, very hard indeed.
Insurance executives are among those that are able to contribute $100,000 to the Republican Party, or $200,000 to the Democrats in order to sit in on the PLATFORM COMMITTEE. (And, they DO do this.) The Platform committee sets the goals and policies of the next administration, Republican or Democrat, and also represent the group with the largest number of lobbyists. In return for all that participation, they also get favorable legislation passed, such as MANDATORY INSURANCE. That is equal to CAPTIVE AUDIENCE. No matter which insurance company you go with, YOU WILL PAY THEIR RATE BECAUSE THE LAW SAYS YOU WILL. And, their finances are so complex, even the regulators and auditors do not fully understand it all. They could be financing drug cartels and get away with it for decades with no one realizing it. (My daughter-in-law works at an insurance company, and is the head of her department. She reports directly to one of the senior VP's. One of the areas that seldom ever gets any publicity. She doesn't say much about her work, but every now and then, if you don't miss the comment completely, it's an "ATTENTION-GETTER".) Want to break the back of insurance companies and their hold on this country??? Make insurance VOLINTARY. The founder of Century Insurance in Stevens Point, WI once made the comment that he was wealthy enough to put any man into the governor's seat that he wanted, regardless of how the public felt about that candidate. Think about it.
__________________
( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)
YES ! ! ! There is life after trucking. a GOOD life
#5
BANNED
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 801
I don't mind paying for insurance, i don't mind at all, its just that I KNOW when it comes time to use it, i will not get my monies worth. Everything concerning health care in this country is just insanely expensive. Last year i had to do some work on my teeth. I actualy looked at the pricing structure here and it about blew my mind. It would cost me around 2500$ to fix my teeth, only three of them with one of them i was told needed to be taken out completely. I purchased the ticket to Croatia as I have a family there for 800$, drilled out two of them and filled the other one with white filling without taking it out, for only 80$. I stayed there on a month long vacation anyways with my wife and i took the best doctor in a city. Excelent choice and i have been a happy camper ever since. My parents went there for a minor surgery just 4 months ago due to very high cost of doing it here....even though they have insurance!!!!!! That 20% that insurance didn't pay on their policy bought them a month long vacation and made their stay very pleasant... Cost in the states is unbelivable and you dont know it untill you actualy go out and compare it around. Last edited by Dejanh; 08-15-2009 at 04:46 AM.
#6
I was speaking more in terms of auto insurance. If my own income had kept up with the increases over the years, I would be making more than half a million dollars a year now.
__________________
( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)
YES ! ! ! There is life after trucking. a GOOD life
#7
BANNED
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 801
It does not matter what insurance it is, they are all the same, and yes, i recieved a notice from Allstate just the other day, saying that my policy in increasing in price...
#8
__________________
#9
Canada is one of the most wealthy nations on this earth, I have been there many times and have many friends living there. No one ever complains about the quality health care, they have everything we have here its just that they pay alot less for it.
All insurance companies are a fraud, just like banks and even though its a trillion dollar buisiness they are still getting bailed out by US(me and you), yet give us no service in return. Insurance companies refuse to insure those who have pre-existing medical condition. Why, because they can, just like the banks can take our deposits, invest it in a stock market, piss it away then get more money from our government to make up those loses......They are a burden on our society and unless we stand up for ourselves we will never fix this problem. Standing up against a trillion dollar machine is very hard, very hard indeed.
You would have to have a basic understanding of the process to answer this question, nay? Money goes into the system through premiums. It gets invested (sometimes poorly). Some gets paid out as claims. The rest is kept as a profit. Save the lectures about the evil of profits for someone else. I have no use for that discussion. Just try to answer my question about pre-existing conditions. If I can't be excluded, then I can contribute a big zippo to the insurance pool, get sick, apply for coverage (for which I can't be denied) after the fact, pay my first premium, and then suck a bunch of money out of the pool. Quick summary: Bankrupt system. And they're not trying to destroy our existing coverage, right? Come on now. So they put in a provision to dictate that I buy coverage, ostensibly to avoid the situation that I just described. If I choose not to comply, I pay a penalty of 2.5% of my income above a certain threshold. Since my premiums right now are right around 2.5% of my total income (leaving aside the much larger employer contribution), I'm better off opting out and bankrupting the system. But the lawyers who write these bills don't know this, right? Of course they do. Somehow though, I do suspect that the politicians have no idea what they're talking about.
__________________
Reading this blog will make you smarter and/or more attractive. (The preceding statement has not been evaluated by the FCC.)
#10
BANNED
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 801
$1.5-2 trillion in ten years is a drop in the bucket? You and I apparently have vastly differing understandings of that metaphor. And that's not even for a "universal" plan. We (the insured) would still be paying our premiums and co-pays, over and above the federal outlay.
And yet they do have major shortages of doctors in many areas. And yet they do have lower survival rates than we do for virtually every major disease. And yet they do have provisions in place for their citizens to take their country to court and get reimbursed for treatment that they were denied in Canada and received in America. I have yet to hear of the border-jumping occurring in the other direction.
To avoid a problem you mentioned above, everyone would pay into a fund just like you do now, its just that everyone would be covered and you would not have people(who do not have ins.) passing on their costs to those who have insurance already. Cost of not covering those who cannot afford it is way to high to keep the current system in place.... You would have to have a basic understanding of the process to answer this question, nay? Money goes into the system through premiums. It gets invested (sometimes poorly). Some gets paid out as claims. The rest is kept as a profit. Save the lectures about the evil of profits for someone else. I have no use for that discussion. Just try to answer my question about pre-existing conditions.
No one is calling on the profits even though they are outrageous compared to what service they give us in return. They are keeping the profits yet bankrupting our country. If I can't be excluded, then I can contribute a big zippo to the insurance pool, get sick, apply for coverage (for which I can't be denied) after the fact, pay my first premium, and then suck a bunch of money out of the pool. Quick summary: Bankrupt system. And they're not trying to destroy our existing coverage, right? Come on now.
So they put in a provision to dictate that I buy coverage, ostensibly to avoid the situation that I just described. If I choose not to comply, I pay a penalty of 2.5% of my income above a certain threshold. Since my premiums right now are right around 2.5% of my total income (leaving aside the much larger employer contribution), I'm better off opting out and bankrupting the system. But the lawyers who write these bills don't know this, right? Of course they do. Somehow though, I do suspect that the politicians have no idea what they're talking about.
Last edited by Dejanh; 08-15-2009 at 11:50 AM. |

