[flood]

this is sick....
http://www.kptv.com/video/13588090/index.html?taf=ptl1

[Mackman]

its un-real that he was still workin after that for alittle bit.

[silvan]

Originally Posted by Mackman

its un-real that he was still workin after that for alittle bit.

Agreed. Although I would not mind showering with that lady any day of the week. :twisted:

[Phantom433a]

I feel violated like....I don't know how to explain. I feel really violated

Pretty much says it all, dosen't it

[dtryanxpress]

see ppl this is why i dont shower! ops:


lol TA let pervert keep his job for a little longer before suspending him... :lol:

[geeshock]

bet you all will never look at those vents the same way

[unkut2003]

Either way.... she was pretty hot, hahaha!

[Consider]

Originally Posted by dtryanxpress

see ppl this is why i dont shower! ops:

lol

[Uturn2001]

In a way I find it interesting at what people often consider perverted.

So many are calling what this guy did perverted (viewing people naked) but many of the same people think nothing about opening up a Playboy type magazine or viewing pictures of nude people via the internet.

I am not defending what this guy at the TA did or anyone who does something similar, nor am I condoning such actions even in the least. I also fully acknowledge that the difference between the peeping that went on an a Playboy is that the people in the magazine were/are fully aware of what was going on and a willing participant.

All I am saying is that the line, while there and very well defined, is also somewhat thin as to what constitutes someone being a pervert.

[Malaki86]

Originally Posted by Uturn2001

In a way I find it interesting at what people often consider perverted.

So many are calling what this guy did perverted (viewing people naked) but many of the same people think nothing about opening up a Playboy type magazine or viewing pictures of nude people via the internet.

I am not defending what this guy at the TA did or anyone who does something similar, nor am I condoning such actions even in the least. I also fully acknowledge that the difference between the peeping that went on an a Playboy is that the people in the magazine were/are fully aware of what was going on and a willing participant.

All I am saying is that the line, while there and very well defined, is also somewhat thin as to what constitutes someone being a pervert.

It's completely different to pick up a Playboy and look at the beautiful hotness in the magazine compared to looking through a vent at someone taking a shower.

Why?

The people that pose for magazines, make porn movies, expose themselves on webcams, etc etc etc are doing it so that people WILL look at them naked. The people taking a shower are taking a shower for one reason - to get clean.

It's not a thin line at all.