Did Haggard contribute to Bush's trademark hypocrisy?

Thread Tools
  #111  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:05 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redneckistan
Posts: 2,831
Default

Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by Fozzy
I disagree with the premise that all homosexuals are choosing to be such. Some IMHO choose to be homosexual while some are born this way. Homosexuality is natural (i.e. appearing in other species in nature). I myself do not care which it is. I see people choosing to do all sorts of things that I have no interest in. I as of yet have to see anything that makes someone being gay that makes them "bad" or worse than anyone else that walks on the earth. In American people have the right and freedoms to practice all sorts of things. You do not have the right to not be offended, You can be offended all you like and not partake in the activities that offend you.
I have a concern that you may not be aware that you appear to be on the same side of this issue as me....
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day :P
 
  #112  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:16 PM
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 643
Default

When you go to vote tomorrow... (I hope you vote...) I hope you vote for a change... (tax breaks for the worker, not the upper, MOST wealthy people in the country; money going to education, not war; listening to the military advisers, not former CEOs who will profit from war; a drug program that helps people, not one that's a windfall for pharmaceutical companies; there's more to it than this... but these are good examples.)
 
__________________
http://www.health-boundaries-bite.com
Your fingernails reflect your health --
Learn some warning signs --
Karen Kline
  #113  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:23 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by Consider
When you go to vote tomorrow... (I hope you vote...) I hope you vote for a change...
I already voted, and I did indeed vote for change - I voted to get that slimebag Doyle out of our Governor's office in Wisconsin, and get a RESPONSIBLE Republican in there once again.

(tax breaks for the worker, not the upper, MOST wealthy people in the country;
Please see my post about 6 pages ago regarding tax breaks.

money going to education, not war; listening to the military advisers, not former CEOs who will profit from war; a drug program that helps people, not one that's a windfall for pharmaceutical companies; there's more to it than this... but these are good examples.)
Most of the things you cite are SERVICES AND HANDOUTS. The government is in business to PROTECT its citizens, not give them FREE GOODIES.

Just sayin'. :wink:
 
  #114  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:28 PM
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Originally Posted by Consider
You said you could post a comparable list,
You are right - I said I COULD. I never said I WOULD.

so I say, go to a comparable site,

cut and paste... and there we have it...

Some Charity gets some money
.
Therein lies the problem. There aren't any of these propaganda Republican Wiki's in existence. The proportion of propaganda Democrat websites to Republican websites is astronomical. Democrats are just more vocal when they don't like things - Republicans spend less time whining about it,





Awwwww. I like Merlot, myself. But that's about it.






and just try to fix the problem in the first place.

And I don't feel like compiling a list on my own. I only work hard when I am being paid to do so. :wink:



That's exactly why I offered the $500 to a charity.



Unless of course you know that there are not that many or even nearly that many sexually deviant Democrats....
To be honest, I really couldn't care if there are or not.



Look, EVERYONE should care.

Look at that list I posted. It is HUGE. There should not be that many sexually deviant leaders, much less sexually deviant leaders who are hypocritically preaching Family Values and Christianity and bashing gays.




Originally Posted by Consider
One thing I may have failed to say is that when I say, "people are born gay," I don't mean that it's a gene.

I think it's more subtle than that... maybe a DNA chain, or hormones... or something in the DNA that affects the hormones.

These are physical things, but they aren't "genes" specifically.
What do you think that DNA does? :shock: (I'll give you a hint - it starts with "G", and ends with "S", and the three letters inbetween are "ENE") :wink:
Hmmm. I think it's different than that... I'm going to look up the two terms...

Originally Posted by The American Heritage Dictionary
gene n. A hereditary unit that occupies a specific location on a chromosome and determines a particular characteristic in an organism. Genes exist in a number of different forms and can undergo mutation. [From Greek genos, race, offspring. See gen…- below.]

DNA n. A nucleic acid that carries the genetic information in the cell and is capable of self-replication and synthesis of RNA. DNA consists of two long chains of nucleotides twisted into a double helix and joined by hydrogen bonds between the complementary bases adenine and thymine or cytosine and guanine. The sequence of nucleotides determines individual hereditary characteristics. [d(eoxyribo)n(ucleic) a(cid).]
Okay... those two things sound different to me. Neither term has the other term as a definition.
 
__________________
http://www.health-boundaries-bite.com
Your fingernails reflect your health --
Learn some warning signs --
Karen Kline
  #115  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:33 PM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Default

Originally Posted by dpatt
Uh Oh Golfhobo...

After reading that I have come to the conclusion there's an ever so slight chance you, yourself may be a closet sexual deviant Christian Republican too.
Just kidding...I don't REALLY think you may be a sexual deviant Christian...
Man! You guys, and this thread, are ALL messed up! The Rev accuses Consider of calling him what only dpatt has called both him AND me!

To the Rev: I know the answer to your quiz. You are ONLY a Republican! No, wait! Maybe, you're only a Christian! I'll have to re-Consider! :lol:

As for your wife getting pizzed off.... don't worry.... she has a picture of ME! :lol: :lol:

As for YOU, dpatt: You couldn't be further from the truth! I am not, nor will I EVER be.... A REPUBLICAN!!! :lol: :lol:

[Even tho you left THAT out of our "edited" apology!]

Consider: I understand your concern for protecting our youth. And I can see the value of such a test to identify predators. But, it still remains that it is against the LAW! You are NOW advocating a breach of our 5th Ammendment rights against "self incrimination!"

The very FACT that you would "consider" abridging one of our rights, in order to "identify" the dangerous people in our midst, shows that you are willing to suspend ANY and ALL of our Constitutional rights to "protect" us from ourselves or others.

And THAT is no different than what BUSH wants to do!!!! :roll:

As for the picture of Bush from your Blogsite (which I've seen before,) in a snapshot moment from a camera, that could easily be a reaction that even "I" would make to some guy telling me he was GAY and wanted to make me KING! It's NOT a sexual "innuendo." It's a man saying, "You said WHAT to the President?"

There is ample reason to question his "connections" and his judgement in who he is photographed with. But, you are NOT allowed to write your own captions!

I take NO pleasure in defending Bush! I despise him. But, unlike HIM and MOST Republicans on this and other sites, I DON'T despise ALL Republicans. That is the difference. I blame ONE single man. [well... you might add Rummy, Cheney and Rove] They accuse ALL Democrats (or at least the Liberals.) BUSH has brought this "mind control" to them. With the help of the Moral Majority, HE has "united" all Republicans against their Democratic brothers. It is now up to US to "save" the UNION!

They ridicule our "get along" philosophy.... but that is the very BASIS of our Constitution and our form of government! It is the ONLY path to PEACE in the World. Domination is NOT a substitute for equality and peace.

In Football, it is said, that the best Defense is a good Offense! But, that does not apply to political and social affairs. Our "meddling" offense has brought us nothing but grief! We need a strong and secure Defense that would deter ANY misguided Offense. We need to once again build the kind of nation that would have others come begging to us for help and guidance.

We have LOST that! And unless we regain it... we will have LOST the WAR, even if we might WIN an occaisional battle.

Hobo
 
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.
  #116  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:37 PM
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Originally Posted by Consider
When you go to vote tomorrow... (I hope you vote...) I hope you vote for a change...
I already voted, and I did indeed vote for change - I voted to get that slimebag Doyle out of our Governor's office in Wisconsin, and get a RESPONSIBLE Republican in there once again.



Let me see... this is what I've read about Doyle and Wisconsin...

Jim Doyle was sworn in as the 44th Governor of Wisconsin on January 6, 2003. He is the first Democratic Governor of Wisconsin in more than 16 years. Governor Doyle has proven to be a strong leader, working in a bipartisan way to get Wisconsin back on track.

When he took office, Governor Doyle inherited a $3.2 billion deficit – the largest deficit in Wisconsin’s history. Governor Doyle faced the challenge head on and balanced the budget while holding the line on taxes. As a result, state taxes as a percentage of income are now the lowest in 34 years


(tax breaks for the worker, not the upper, MOST wealthy people in the country;
Please see my post about 6 pages ago regarding tax breaks.

money going to education, not war; listening to the military advisers, not former CEOs who will profit from war; a drug program that helps people, not one that's a windfall for pharmaceutical companies; there's more to it than this... but these are good examples.)
Most of the things you cite are SERVICES AND HANDOUTS. The government is in business to PROTECT its citizens, not give them FREE GOODIES.

Just sayin'. :wink:
I forget that you are in Wisconsin. I know I told you I worked at the Telephone Company in Green Bay years ago...


The gov. would best protect by providing its citizens with education. You know that Wisconsin was divided up and organized from the beginning to have state universities available for all its people.

Education is not a goodie.

McDonalds is in the goodie category... McDonalds gets corporate welfare... and I find that disgruntling.
 
__________________
http://www.health-boundaries-bite.com
Your fingernails reflect your health --
Learn some warning signs --
Karen Kline
  #117  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:39 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by Consider
That's exactly why I offered the $500 to a charity.
So make THEM do the work.



Look, EVERYONE should care.

Look at that list I posted. It is HUGE. There should not be that many sexually deviant leaders, much less sexually deviant leaders who are hypocritically preaching Family Values and Christianity and bashing gays.
Therein lies the problem - the list you posted is from a propaganda Democrat website. I have no way of even knowing if the list is ACCURATE without cross referencing every single name on it. And I don't care enough to do it. Let the Democrats whine and complain - I don't care. They are just showing themselves for the fools they really are.

Vote for CHANGE? That is a sound byte - Tell me exactly what change you think we should change:

Should we change the fact that our economy is doing BETTER now than when Clinton was in office?

Should we change the fact that we have not seen another terrorist attack on our soil since Sept. 11?

Should we change the fact that the DOW has hit record highs, over and over?

Should we change the fact that the price of oil is FINALLY going DOWN, something that hasn't happened since CLINTON was still in office?

What exactly should we "Change"?


Originally Posted by Consider
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
Originally Posted by Consider
One thing I may have failed to say is that when I say, "people are born gay," I don't mean that it's a gene.

I think it's more subtle than that... maybe a DNA chain, or hormones... or something in the DNA that affects the hormones.

These are physical things, but they aren't "genes" specifically.
What do you think that DNA does? :shock: (I'll give you a hint - it starts with "G", and ends with "S", and the three letters inbetween are "ENE") :wink:
Hmmm. I think it's different than that... I'm going to look up the two terms...

Originally Posted by The American Heritage Dictionary
gene n. A hereditary unit that occupies a specific location on a chromosome and determines a particular characteristic in an organism. Genes exist in a number of different forms and can undergo mutation. [From Greek genos, race, offspring. See gen…- below.]
DNA n. A nucleic acid that carries the genetic information in the cell and is capable of self-replication and synthesis of RNA. DNA consists of two long chains of nucleotides twisted into a double helix and joined by hydrogen bonds between the complementary bases adenine and thymine or cytosine and guanine. The sequence of nucleotides determines individual hereditary characteristics. [d(eoxyribo)n(ucleic) a(cid).]
Okay... those two things sound different to me. Neither term has the other term as a definition.
Nope - they are the same thing, and they go hand in hand.

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is a nucleic acid that contains the genetic instructions for the biological development of a cellular form of life or a virus. All known cellular life and some viruses have DNAs. DNA is a long polymer of nucleotides (a polynucleotide) that encodes the sequence of amino acid residues in proteins, using the genetic code.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dna
 
  #118  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:45 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by golfhobo
Originally Posted by dpatt
Uh Oh Golfhobo...

After reading that I have come to the conclusion there's an ever so slight chance you, yourself may be a closet sexual deviant Christian Republican too.
Just kidding...I don't REALLY think you may be a sexual deviant Christian...
Man! You guys, and this thread, are ALL messed up! The Rev accuses Consider of calling him what only dpatt has called both him AND me!

To the Rev: I know the answer to your quiz. You are ONLY a Republican! No, wait! Maybe, you're only a Christian! I'll have to re-Consider! :lol:
I'm one of them, but ONLY ONE. The other two don't apply.

As for your wife getting pizzed off.... don't worry.... she has a picture of ME! :lol: :lol:
That would explain why she is pizzed off. :P

I take NO pleasure in defending Bush! I despise him. But, unlike HIM and MOST Republicans on this and other sites, I DON'T despise ALL Republicans.
I don't think you will find many Republicans who despise all Republicans ANYWHERE. :wink:

That is the difference. I blame ONE single man. [well... you might add Rummy, Cheney and Rove] They accuse ALL Democrats (or at least the Liberals.)
I know I don't accuse all Democrats of anything - in fact, I accuse the Religious Right with a lot of the problems.

BUSH has brought this "mind control" to them. With the help of the Moral Majority, HE has "united" all Republicans against their Democratic brothers. It is now up to US to "save" the UNION!
He hasn't united me, and the "Moral Majority" can kiss my butt.

In Football, it is said, that the best Defense is a good Offense! But, that does not apply to political and social affairs. Our "meddling" offense has brought us nothing but grief! We need a strong and secure Defense that would deter ANY misguided Offense. We need to once again build the kind of nation that would have others come begging to us for help and guidance.
Thank goodness the Democrats of today weren't around in the time of Hitler, or millions more would have been killed. Just sayin'.
 
  #119  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:52 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

Originally Posted by Consider
Let me see... this is what I've read about Doyle and Wisconsin...

Jim Doyle was sworn in as the 44th Governor of Wisconsin on January 6, 2003. He is the first Democratic Governor of Wisconsin in more than 16 years. Governor Doyle has proven to be a strong leader, working in a bipartisan way to get Wisconsin back on track.

When he took office, Governor Doyle inherited a $3.2 billion deficit – the largest deficit in Wisconsin’s history. Governor Doyle faced the challenge head on and balanced the budget while holding the line on taxes. As a result, state taxes as a percentage of income are now the lowest in 34 years
You heard wrong - the Republicans throughout the state wanted to FREEZE property taxes, which Doyle vetoed. Property taxes have been climbing dramatically since.

I'm sure the sound byte quote you posted came from yet ANOTHER propaganda website.



(tax breaks for the worker, not the upper, MOST wealthy people in the country;
Please see my post about 6 pages ago regarding tax breaks.
I forget that you are in Wisconsin. I know I told you I worked at the Telephone Company in Green Bay years ago...


The gov. would best protect by providing its citizens with education. You know that Wisconsin was divided up and organized from the beginning to have state universities available for all its people.

Education is not a goodie.
The government already provides education. The Republicans wanted to expand this, by allowing inner city youths to obtain school vouchers, so they could attend BETTER private schools - the Governor vetoed this one as well.

McDonalds is in the goodie category... McDonalds gets corporate welfare... and I find that disgruntling.
You mean the same McDonalds who provides countless employment opportunities to the same "average workers" that you are trying to get tax cuts for?

That's right - bite the hand that feeds the voters.
 
  #120  
Old 11-06-2006, 04:56 PM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Default

FDR, a Democrat with a "New Deal" to help the middle to lower class American, took on Hitler and whooped his Azz!

Bush has done neither for or to either!

just replyin' :wink:
 
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 04:29 AM.

Top