User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 08-29-2006, 02:31 AM
uncleal13's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Humboldt, SK
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

It depends on how good you are at managing your money. If you have a good healthy maintenance/emergency fund and you maintain the truck properly, then you could go for ever. If you're lousy with your money and don't take care of the truck then I would trade it in every three years on a new one.
A friend had a 96 FLD w/ CAT 435 1.6 million miles before an inframe. He took care of it, got it up to 2.2 mil before he died at the wheel.
Another had a 99 Century w/ Cummins N14 525 800,000 miles and it was completely trashed. Drove the heck out of it, didn't take care of it. The head gasket went, opened it up, everything was worn out. The king pins were worn out, rear suspension shot, on and on.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-29-2006, 07:45 AM
allan5oh's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas
When a truck gets so old and ragged out that it stays in the shop all the time, that's when it has too many miles on it; whether it be 30'000, 300'000, or 3'000'000 for that matter. :wink:
When I bought my truck, the first 6 months were hell. It had 550,000 miles on it. Now it has about 850,000, and is reliable as hell. Go figure.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-22-2006, 09:15 AM
driverboy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Our company fleet of daycabs are shot with 400,000 miles, falling apart.

Running long haul a Volvo ran like new, cleaner and less vibes than our daycabs with 1.8 million on it.

It's all in how they are treated.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-03-2006, 01:49 AM
turbodave's Avatar
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I just bought a 97' Freightliner w/ a Detroit 60 series with 945k on it. It was well maintained and runs great. Hasn't been rebuilt but the rod and main bearings were changed as PM item. I just put 3.5k miles on it w/ no noticable use of oil. It has some BS issues that you would expect out of truck that old but nothing major.

I heard ryder trucks are well maintained trucks and have heard good things about drivers who bought them.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-03-2006, 03:14 AM
LOAD IT's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbodave
I just bought a 97' Freightliner w/ a Detroit 60 series with 945k on it. It was well maintained and runs great. Hasn't been rebuilt but the rod and main bearings were changed as PM item. I just put 3.5k miles on it w/ no noticable use of oil. It has some BS issues that you would expect out of truck that old but nothing major.

I heard ryder trucks are well maintained trucks and have heard good things about drivers who bought them.
Turbodave, did you ever run a blue intl pulling a 53 step?
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:06 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.