Speed Limiter Petition Filed with FMCSA

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 10-04-2006, 12:38 AM
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 91
Default

Originally Posted by Windwalker
When they tell me I have to govern my truck to that, I'll govern it, all right. I'll PARK IT. When I drove a truck governed at 65, I had far more chances to KILL people than at any other time in my career. Safety is a "driver's call". I will not drive a truck that I feel is unsafe on the hiway. I don't care if I'm sweeping floors, flipping hambergers, or serving pizza. Been there, done that, and I will not do it again.

Come on , tell us how you really feel about this issue.
 
  #12  
Old 10-04-2006, 08:21 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redneckistan
Posts: 2,831
Default

Speed is always the answer..... :roll:
 
  #13  
Old 10-04-2006, 12:27 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Planet Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Damn, the Truck Races are bad enough on the road with trucks governed anywhere from 62-70. I can't imagine life on the road with EVERY truck going the same speed.

-p.
 
  #14  
Old 10-04-2006, 12:40 PM
Board Icon
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,859
Default

Originally Posted by PhuzzyGnu
Damn, the Truck Races are bad enough on the road with trucks governed anywhere from 62-70. I can't imagine life on the road with EVERY truck going the same speed.

-p.
One LONG ass Convoy :P
 
__________________
  #15  
Old 10-05-2006, 05:23 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

Originally Posted by Fozzy
I'd prefer seeing OBR's required...

Fozzy, we have had on-board recorders for years. All you need do is connect to the CPU and it will tell you everything you need to know about the truck, including how fast it has been driven.

I spoke to someone at the ATA a few days ago about this. According to this individual, the ATA hasn't made a final decision as to whether they are recommending this or not. According to what I was told, it is these few carriers who have filed the petition on their own. If you don't want it to proceed, I suggest that you write individual letters to those making these decisions. You may also want to drop a letter to the carriers themselves and let them know how you feel about working for a carrier who has speed limiters on their trucks. It only takes about 5 minutes to govern a truck with a computer. I see no problem with these carrier's governing their own trucks. I do have a problem with them telling me and every other carrier and owner operator how they should run their business.
 
  #16  
Old 10-05-2006, 02:44 PM
Windwalker's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Been there and gone...
Posts: 6,414
Default

Originally Posted by dipstick
Originally Posted by Windwalker
When they tell me I have to govern my truck to that, I'll govern it, all right. I'll PARK IT. When I drove a truck governed at 65, I had far more chances to KILL people than at any other time in my career. Safety is a "driver's call". I will not drive a truck that I feel is unsafe on the hiway. I don't care if I'm sweeping floors, flipping hambergers, or serving pizza. Been there, done that, and I will not do it again.

Come on , tell us how you really feel about this issue.
Okay, I will.

We've all had ocassions when we see a situation building. When I drove a governed truck, there was NOTHING I could do about it. Having a little extra throttle gives me a few options. I generally run at 65 anyhow.

A few years ago, in WI, I came up on a Ford Escort that was only doing about 58 or so. As I went to pass, there were 5 people in it, and when I got even with the driver's door, he speeded up. In a short time, he was about 100 feet in front of me again. I tried to pass again, and same thing. I slowed down to 45 mph and he was still 100 feet in front. Try to pass, and he speeds up again. Another truck was passing me (and him) and a deer jumped out. The Ford hit the brakes, and the deer. He stopped, half in my lane, half on the shoulder. Another truck alongside of me. I put some pretty deep ruts in the grass, but didn't lose control or roll the truck. I managed to get it up on the shoulder and stop. 5 high school kids that thought it was a joke to play around with trucks. I've also found that a little extra speed available stops their GAME.

"Oh, oh.... This one's not governed." and the game is over. Now, they don't know what your top end is.

Otherwise, you slow down, and they slow down. You slow down more, and they do the same thing. You can be down to 35 mph, and they are still 100 feet in front of you. And, that's only one example.

Pass a law that all trucks must be governed at 65, and you'll have many more of these "games" on the hiway. NO!!! Govern the trucks, even the O/Os, and I QUIT!!!
 
__________________
( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)
YES ! ! ! There is life after trucking.
a GOOD life

  #17  
Old 10-06-2006, 06:29 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Windwalker
Originally Posted by dipstick
Originally Posted by Windwalker
When they tell me I have to govern my truck to that, I'll govern it, all right. I'll PARK IT. When I drove a truck governed at 65, I had far more chances to KILL people than at any other time in my career. Safety is a "driver's call". I will not drive a truck that I feel is unsafe on the hiway. I don't care if I'm sweeping floors, flipping hambergers, or serving pizza. Been there, done that, and I will not do it again.

Come on , tell us how you really feel about this issue.
Okay, I will.

We've all had ocassions when we see a situation building. When I drove a governed truck, there was NOTHING I could do about it. Having a little extra throttle gives me a few options. I generally run at 65 anyhow.

A few years ago, in WI, I came up on a Ford Escort that was only doing about 58 or so. As I went to pass, there were 5 people in it, and when I got even with the driver's door, he speeded up. In a short time, he was about 100 feet in front of me again. I tried to pass again, and same thing. I slowed down to 45 mph and he was still 100 feet in front. Try to pass, and he speeds up again. Another truck was passing me (and him) and a deer jumped out. The Ford hit the brakes, and the deer. He stopped, half in my lane, half on the shoulder. Another truck alongside of me. I put some pretty deep ruts in the grass, but didn't lose control or roll the truck. I managed to get it up on the shoulder and stop. 5 high school kids that thought it was a joke to play around with trucks. I've also found that a little extra speed available stops their GAME.

"Oh, oh.... This one's not governed." and the game is over. Now, they don't know what your top end is.

Otherwise, you slow down, and they slow down. You slow down more, and they do the same thing. You can be down to 35 mph, and they are still 100 feet in front of you. And, that's only one example.

Pass a law that all trucks must be governed at 65, and you'll have many more of these "games" on the hiway. NO!!! Govern the trucks, even the O/Os, and I QUIT!!!
Yeah I don't know what it is, our trucks are governed at 70 mph, today as I was driving home a single person in a small SUV was driving along at probably about 65-66mph. I go for the pass, should be pretty easy. He speeds up just as I'm nose and nose with him, and matches my speed. We go past an on ramp and now there are cars behind me and him. I know that if I slow down any I'm just going to make it worse for me. If I wasn't goverened I could have sped up and around him but I was stuck there. 70 isn't really a bad speed, but I wish with the computerized governers they let you go above governed speed for a period of time, that seems like the safest idea.

I just don't understand why people can't figure out how to use the cruise control.
 
  #18  
Old 10-06-2006, 02:34 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 261
Default

The boss of our company has the truck set to 63 on cruise and 65 if we don't use the cruise. it has taken some time to get use to and it is frustrating when trying to pass someone and they speed up. He done it because we had some people that thought it would be okay to do 70 and above so all of us had to suffer. We run mostly Washington and Oregon so it works for us. the only time i really bugs me is when we run in Idaho
 
  #19  
Old 10-22-2006, 04:26 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Default

It seems that the ATA (American Trucking Association) has now filed a petition with the Feds to attempt to force all truck manufacturer's to put speed limiters on from the factory with stiff penalties for anyone who tampers with them. If they have their way we will all be forced to travel at no more than 68 mph. OOIDA is opposing the petition, but the ATA has a lot of resources to put behind this move. You can read about it in the current issue of Landline Magazine.
 
  #20  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:21 AM
One's Avatar
One
One is offline
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NE Ga
Posts: 1,529
Default

Oh well, if they find it ok that traffic will be cronically following too closely and trucks doing 68 blocking the place, then I wont have ANY problem running in the Hammer lane at my 65 for 300 miles at a time. My carrier has a policy that im supposed to move over for merging traffic...Well, if i CAN move over due to slow passers, then ill be stuck there due to the impatient right-lane passers. Can you say CLUSTERF***?
If this gets passed, itll be just another example of laws made for the benefit of big business, not for the safety of the population. :evil:
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 10:22 AM.

Top