1423 miles on 166.5 gal of fuel

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 12-07-2010, 11:00 AM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by tracer
I don't idle, I use my bunk heater when it's cold. Unless it's 0F (-18C). Then I might idle for an hour before going to bed - if the truck sat for a day or two. When my battery is properly charged, the truck starts okay.
I've got to get my Webasto in this truck. I took it out my IH before I sold it but haven't had time. Well, I'm now freezing my azz off.

Your mpg seems good to me. Even with a empty box, my 05 IH w/ACERT only got 6.5mpg on a good day. I hated it
 
  #12  
Old 12-08-2010, 01:05 PM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy
I've got to get my Webasto in this truck. I took it out my IH before I sold it but haven't had time. Well, I'm now freezing my azz off.

Your mpg seems good to me. Even with a empty box, my 05 IH w/ACERT only got 6.5mpg on a good day. I hated it
Check your turbo system for leaks: charge air cooler; air-to-air hoses (especially where clamps are); exhaust manifold etc.. Lose your ACERT muffler. Last but not least: do a Dyno on the CAT. It'll be worth every cent you pay for it.
 
  #13  
Old 12-08-2010, 02:49 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by tracer
Check your turbo system for leaks: charge air cooler; air-to-air hoses (especially where clamps are); exhaust manifold etc.. Lose your ACERT muffler. Last but not least: do a Dyno on the CAT. It'll be worth every cent you pay for it.
I sold the truck a few months ago, so I'm not worried about it. I now have 1998 engine and dont worry about my mpg seeing I'm getting close to 9 out of it overall LOL
 
  #14  
Old 12-19-2010, 12:49 PM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

So you got 8.5 MPG. My '06 Volvo w/ 465 HP Volvo D12 routinely gets 9.0 MPG when I'm MT. And that it with a heavier box trailer. If I had your trailer, I could get 9.5-10.0 MPG.
 
  #15  
Old 12-20-2010, 01:35 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
So you got 8.5 MPG. My '06 Volvo w/ 465 HP Volvo D12 routinely gets 9.0 MPG when I'm MT. And that it with a heavier box trailer. If I had your trailer, I could get 9.5-10.0 MPG.
thats damn good.. but my company truck has a 515 detroit.. 10 speed 3.58 gears.. runs 66 and i'm a bit rough on it with alot of stop and go..almost like clock work.. 7.5mpg.. when it was turned up to 76mph it went down to about 6.8.. oh yeah and it pulls like an animal. i talked to my buddy yesterday that has a 6nz 550hp, 18dblod, 3.36 gears in a 379, he runs between 6.5 and 71 and he's averaging 6.1..

by the way to the people that i said them long nose trucks cant get ok milage.. i was wrong. :lol:
 
  #16  
Old 12-21-2010, 02:20 AM
tracer's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
So you got 8.5 MPG. My '06 Volvo w/ 465 HP Volvo D12 routinely gets 9.0 MPG when I'm MT. And that it with a heavier box trailer. If I had your trailer, I could get 9.5-10.0 MPG.
Have you ever counted the gallons of fuel purchased in US gallons versus miles driven?
 
  #17  
Old 12-21-2010, 04:54 AM
solo379's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,831
Default

Originally Posted by tracer
Have you ever counted the gallons of fuel purchased in US gallons versus miles driven?
I doubt it..And that's in my opinion is the only fair way to count. What you have paid for, not what some dashboard display said. And the more miles is the better. Most important is your average!
 
__________________
Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!
  #18  
Old 12-21-2010, 10:40 AM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by solo379
I doubt it..And that's in my opinion is the only fair way to count. What you have paid for, not what some dashboard display said. And the more miles is the better. Most important is your average!
But also, if you go by the PUMP, you could be between 3-10gallons off too. Just last week I filled my tanks to the bottom of their filler-neck, then for the heck of it I added 6 gallons, it was still at the same spot on the neck. I'm just saying. 6 gallons on each tank made me loose 1mpg....... **** it too hard to judge. the dashboard display actually accounts for HOW MUCH FUEL passes thru the injectors which gives you a BETTER reading.

I honestly don't trust either method and just know I make WAAAYYY more than I spend, so I am happy LOL
 
  #19  
Old 12-21-2010, 01:32 PM
solo379's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,831
Default

Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy
But also, if you go by the PUMP, you could be between 3-10gallons off too.
I know. That's why i've said the more miles you run, the better your estimate will be. I also fill it up at a very few familiar locations, so the angle my truck and tanks stay, is always the same.
 
__________________
Pessimist,- is just well informed optimist!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Top