What Ever Happened To The D.O.T. Air Pressure Maintain Requirement?

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 08-13-2010, 08:24 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: tennesse
Posts: 738
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
I remember when going to truck driving school in 1991, there was a D.O.T. requirement for a vehicle to maintain air pressure; i.e. you applied something like 30 PSI brake pressure, and vehicle main tank pressures should drop no more than X number of PSI in one minute's time.

My new (2006) Volvo does not have a gauge for main air pressure tanks nor for applied brake pressure either!!! ops:

Without those gauges, there is no way to verify D.O.T. compliance (if it still exists, that is).

What is up with that?
having worked for us xpress i can tell you that you realy need to LOOK AT THE DASH....!!! every usx truck HAS AIR GAUGES. all 10 i have had did and yes i have had 04, (2)05, 06, (2)07,& 08 volvo's and they ALL HAD AIR GAUGES. two on the lower right. so until you can post a pic that shows them missing i call this post B S


this a pic of my 08 volvo dash. you can just see 1 air gauge (far right) the other is below it behind the and wheel. and yes this is an 08 volvo but they havn't changed the dash at all fron the 04 i had.
 

Last edited by flood; 08-13-2010 at 08:41 PM.
  #12  
Old 08-13-2010, 11:03 PM
chris1's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 847
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
Violations? I passed my latest D.O.T. Inspection with flying colors, and my current Inspection was still current. You are simply blowing hot air! :lol:
Never would have passed having to plug in the trailer light cord to operate the rear tractor lights.(you can't have a manually interrupted electrical source)
Headlight wired to the marker light cicuit is another electrical wiring violation.(though it may not be easy to catch)
You can find someone to give an annual inspection even with parts dragging on the ground.
 
  #13  
Old 08-13-2010, 11:04 PM
chris1's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 847
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
Vehicle is not so equipped from the factory. All it has is an audible & visual alarm when air drops below acceptable (probably 60 PSI).

They probably figure the average idiot from a three-week truck driving school would only get confused if he has too many gauges!!!
Truck could not be manufactured for sale in the US without an air gauge and warning system.
 
  #14  
Old 08-14-2010, 02:45 AM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

(post removed, due to a brain fart)
 

Last edited by Aufgeblassen; 08-14-2010 at 03:17 AM.
  #15  
Old 08-15-2010, 12:57 AM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by flood
all 10 i have had did and yes i have had 04, (2)05, 06, (2)07,& 08 volvo's and they ALL HAD AIR GAUGES.
Did your '06 happen to be truck# 60848? That is the number that is still on the top left corner of the back of my "new" truck.
 

Last edited by Aufgeblassen; 08-15-2010 at 01:21 AM.
  #16  
Old 08-15-2010, 03:05 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by chris1
Truck could not be manufactured for sale in the US without an air gauge and warning system.
EXACTLY..... it has air gauges, look closer.

God I'd hate to see you behind the wheel of my 74 Pete with the 23 gauges it has, I think your head would explode :eek2:

Going by your screen name, I am going to guess your a "foreigner" as well. Seems like you guys all think Volvo's are the BEST TRUCKS IN THE WORLD.... I think it's because they match your jogging pants and mandals
 
  #17  
Old 08-16-2010, 12:15 AM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy
EXACTLY..... it has air gauges, look closer.

God I'd hate to see you behind the wheel of my 74 Pete with the 23 gauges it has, I think your head would explode :eek2:

Going by your screen name, I am going to guess your a "foreigner" as well. Seems like you guys all think Volvo's are the BEST TRUCKS IN THE WORLD.... I think it's because they match your jogging pants and mandals
No foreigner here. You are simply mistaken. In fact, back in '05 when I got my 1st Volvo, I actually hadn't even heard of the VED12 engine; I was only familiar with Cummins, Cat, and Detroit. I didn't want a Cat because they are fuel guzzlers. My only choices were Cummins or Volvo. But I took a chance on the Volvo engine & WON!
 
  #18  
Old 08-16-2010, 06:32 AM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
No foreigner here. You are simply mistaken. In fact, back in '05 when I got my 1st Volvo, I actually hadn't even heard of the VED12 engine; I was only familiar with Cummins, Cat, and Detroit. I didn't want a Cat because they are fuel guzzlers. My only choices were Cummins or Volvo. But I took a chance on the Volvo engine & WON!
I personally don't care for Volvo's but then again, I have never owned one. I think the interior is terrible looking. It's not much different than there cars. It's just a prefference I guess. I just tossed you into the sterotype because I dont know many guys from here who buy a Volvo as a personal truck is all..... then again, I live near Chicago LOL

As far as engines, a ACERT CAT is good on fuel. My T600 avg 6.1mpg pulling machinery on a 55T

I preffer a old 12.7 Detroit or a Big Cam Cummins myself, tho I have been looking at a brand new 389 w/ISX (No UREA)
 
  #19  
Old 08-17-2010, 05:30 PM
heavyhaulerss's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: north alabama
Posts: 1,200
Default

Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy
I personally don't care for Volvo's but then again, I have never owned one. I think the interior is terrible looking. It's not much different than there cars. It's just a prefference I guess. I just tossed you into the sterotype because I dont know many guys from here who buy a Volvo as a personal truck is all..... then again, I live near Chicago LOL

As far as engines, a ACERT CAT is good on fuel. My T600 avg 6.1mpg pulling machinery on a 55T

I preffer a old 12.7 Detroit or a Big Cam Cummins myself, tho I have been looking at a brand new 389 w/ISX (No UREA)
Chicago.. my ole stomp'in ground
 
  #20  
Old 08-17-2010, 05:31 PM
heavyhaulerss's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: north alabama
Posts: 1,200
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
No foreigner here. You are simply mistaken. In fact, back in '05 when I got my 1st Volvo, I actually hadn't even heard of the VED12 engine; I was only familiar with Cummins, Cat, and Detroit. I didn't want a Cat because they are fuel guzzlers. My only choices were Cummins or Volvo. But I took a chance on the Volvo engine & WON!
Aufgeblassen... du bist deutsch ja?
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 08:54 PM.

Top