Axle Ratio

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 08-05-2010, 08:20 AM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by Jackrabbit379
A friend of mine has a 359 with 3.55 rears. 475 CAT, with a 15 behind it. It's cool driving about 72 and the motor is running about 1600.
Feels like you are going down a country road in a Cadillac.
My new truck should run about 1550 RPM @ 72 MPH (not that I EVER run at that fuel wasting speed!!!). :smokin:
 
  #12  
Old 08-11-2010, 12:09 PM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

Update:

I got my new (actually a 2006) Volvo 780, and the 3.42 axle ratio vs. the 3.58 of my old truck lowers my RPMs from 1340 or so to an even 1300 RPM @ 60 MPH. :smokin:
 
  #13  
Old 08-12-2010, 04:19 AM
Aufgeblassen's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by Mackman
Get real trucks with 3.90s or 4.10s :thumbsup:

I know you guys are talking OTR
Yeah, real dumb trucks!

No, I run regional/Southeast only, and am home EVERY weekend. Pretty much just Florida & Georgia.
 
  #14  
Old 08-13-2010, 09:13 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,567
Default

Originally Posted by Shnerdly
Actually, it's the opposite. The larger the number, the higher the RPMs of the engine will be.

Copperhead has it right. The way it is usually talked about makes it kind of an odd concept.

When people say they are lowering their gear ration, the are actually going to a gear set that has a higher number but the reference to a lower gear ratio means a lower top speed.

If you have 3.42 gear ratio, your drive shaft will turn 3.42 revolutions to one revolution of the wheel. If you have a 3.58 gear ratio your drive shaft will turn 3.58 revolutions for one revolution of the wheel giving you a lower top speed and slightly higher RPM if all other factors are the same.

The other factors are tire size being 22.5 or 24.5 and low profile or not. Also the transmission matters. Some are direct drive meaning the output to the drive shaft is equal to engine RPM's in high gear. Some are overdrive meaning the drive shaft is going slightly faster then engine RPM's in high gear. There are even some underdrive transmissions out there though they are not very common.
Yes, Yes, I understand this concept, my brain was in the wrong gear!
 
__________________
Terry L. Davis
O/O with own authority
  #15  
Old 08-15-2010, 01:41 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by Mackman
Get real trucks with 3.90s or 4.10s :thumbsup:

I know you guys are talking OTR but if it makes you feel any better I got 3.90s with a 13speed. Turn around 1550-1600 rpm at 60
My 99 FLD has 3.90's, a direct 10 speed, and 22.5LP's and at 1550 im going 65mph ???

Guess your final drive must be higher than mine.

Anyways, I keep it about 1400 and go 60mph in the right lane and have avg'd 8.2mpg for the last 2 years (pulling light dry bulk)
 
  #16  
Old 08-15-2010, 01:44 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by Aufgeblassen
Yeah, real dumb trucks!

No, I run regional/Southeast only, and am home EVERY weekend. Pretty much just Florida & Georgia.
Not true....... I just sold one of my 2005 IH that had 3.23 rears with a 435 C-15 and at 75mph it was at 1450rpm. Got 6.3mpg....... I'm doing the same run in my FLD now and getting over 8mpg with the 3.90's

I work 4 days a week, Chicago to Corpus Christi and back.
 
  #17  
Old 08-15-2010, 02:16 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,567
Default

Originally Posted by Steel Horse Cowboy
My 99 FLD has 3.90's, a direct 10 speed, and 22.5LP's and at 1550 im going 65mph ???

Guess your final drive must be higher than mine.

Anyways, I keep it about 1400 and go 60mph in the right lane and have avg'd 8.2mpg for the last 2 years (pulling light dry bulk)
You don't have a direct drive with those numbers.
 
__________________
Terry L. Davis
O/O with own authority
  #18  
Old 08-15-2010, 02:53 PM
Steel Horse Cowboy's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 778
Default

Originally Posted by terrylamar
You don't have a direct drive with those numbers.
I'm quite sure it is..... I'll look up the exact trans # tomorrow.
 

Last edited by Steel Horse Cowboy; 08-15-2010 at 03:19 PM.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 07:29 AM.

Top