User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 05-15-2009, 05:04 PM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I have never owned a Western Star but those to whom I have spoken seem to like them. I did hear some negative things about the quality after Freightliner got involved with them. I would say that they are about as good as any other truck.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-15-2009, 08:42 PM
avguy's Avatar
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Owego, NY
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I see alot of Western Star trucks out in logging areas, so they must be reasonably durable.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-17-2009, 04:35 PM
Oso's Avatar
Oso Oso is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Okay, here's another random question: what is the benefit of side kits on flatbeds? Easier tarping? Does it allow you to take different loads (i.e. van loads?) If you're not tied to a particular type of flatbed freight is it a good thing for an o/o to own?

I usually see them on steel carriers - and once I unloaded one filled with loose watermellons - by hand. (that was over 10 years ago and I still remember that day VERY clearly!!!)

Last edited by Oso; 05-17-2009 at 04:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-18-2009, 01:00 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

I have owned a side kit for many years. There are some shippers who require a side kit and won't load a regular flat. Onions are much easier to haul in a side kit and it does a much better job of protecting the product. Some shippers won't load copper tubing or aluminum coils on anything but a curtain side, Conestoga or side kit. When I pulled the kit I rarely had to break it completely down. If you haul a lot of steel such as coils it can save a considerable amount of tarp time. With some loads it can be beneficial having a kit to keep the tarp away from the product. I have hauled copper tubing that is loaded from the rear but must unload from the side. That is the reason some will load a side kit and not a van. It saves having to repair tarps when you can keep it away from sharp edges. There are times when you may still need to take your kit down but it is fairly easy to store in the nose or in an underneath carriage. It boils down to what you want to haul.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-31-2009, 04:33 AM
Oso's Avatar
Oso Oso is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Here's a few more questions:

1. If you're interested in a used truck that doesn't have side fairings (ie. fuel tank covers) how easy is it to have these retrofitted? (And if you're a fan of fairings and other aerodynamic aids, is it generally worth it?)

2. Are there any advantages to dual exhaust stacks vs. a single?

3. I understand that Mack & other proprietary engines are more expensive to repair than a Cummins. Could someone offer an opinion about how much more a Mack engine (MP8) would cost per year - or perhaps over the lifetime of the engine.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-31-2009, 10:15 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oso View Post
Here's a few more questions:

1. If you're interested in a used truck that doesn't have side fairings (ie. fuel tank covers) how easy is it to have these retrofitted? (And if you're a fan of fairings and other aerodynamic aids, is it generally worth it?)
I would not think it would be difficult to retrofit fairings. You just mount your brackets then bolt on the fairings. I was thinking about replacing a couple of fairings on my International several years ago. I believe that each panel cost about $700 each. I have 6 panels on that truck. The cost could vary from one brand to another. You may also find panels in a junk or salvage yard for less. Fairings are supposed to boost your fuel mileage but I don't recall how much. The down side to having fairings is that it is more difficult to get underneath to check or do things to the truck.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Oso View Post
2. Are there any advantages to dual exhaust stacks vs. a single?
I don't know if there are any advantages to having dual stacks other than the look. I think the last truck that I had dual stacks on was a Peterbilt. You need to consider that it costs twice as much to replace your mufflers when the time comes.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Oso View Post
3. I understand that Mack & other proprietary engines are more expensive to repair than a Cummins. Could someone offer an opinion about how much more a Mack engine (MP8) would cost per year - or perhaps over the lifetime of the engine.
I doubt that I would ever buy a truck that had a proprietary engine. I considered buying a Mack truck several years ago. The reason I decided against it was due to the Mack engine. It was a good engine but I knew that if I ever had a problem that I would most likely need to find a dealer. Dealers usually have higher labor rates and there may not be one where I need them. It can be difficult to find mechanics who will work on Mack, Volvo engines or Mercedes, for example. Another problem can be parts. At least that was a problem when I was thinking about buying one. Mack is a French company and may not have all parts available at the dealer or parts distributor. They could need to order them from abroad. That can cost time plus additional costs. It is much easier and less costly to buy Cummins, Detroit or Cat.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-31-2009, 07:28 PM
Oso's Avatar
Oso Oso is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMAN View Post
I doubt that I would ever buy a truck that had a proprietary engine. I considered buying a Mack truck several years ago. The reason I decided against it was due to the Mack engine. It was a good engine but I knew that if I ever had a problem that I would most likely need to find a dealer. Dealers usually have higher labor rates and there may not be one where I need them. It can be difficult to find mechanics who will work on Mack, Volvo engines or Mercedes, for example.
Is that because you run mostly OTR? Do you think that some regions have better networks for proprietary engines?

One of the reasons that I ask is that I've seen a lot of Volvos in the Toronto area (they seem to be just as popular as Freightliner & International) and I wonder if they've built up a good network in this area. I know that many Volvo's have a Cummins, but I've also seen a lot with D13's.

You're a storehouse of good info GMAN! Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-01-2009, 11:43 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oso View Post
Is that because you run mostly OTR? Do you think that some regions have better networks for proprietary engines?
That is a major reason for not wanting a proprietary engine. If I worked mostly local then I would be more inclined to consider a proprietary engine. International Harvester and Paccar are coming out with their own engines. I would not want either of them due to the potential difficulty in getting someone to work on them. Parts might not be as much of an issue with these two brands since they should be made in the U.S. However, with Volvo the parts may need to come from outside the country. That could create delays in getting the truck moving. Even a complete overhaul on one of the big three engines would only take a day or so providing you can get into the garage. At least parts would be available. When you overhaul a diesel engine you may not always know what you will get into until you tear the engine down. That is why some overhauls cost more than others. For instance, I was quoted from just under $10,000 to about $18,000 to rebuild a CAT engine. That is a big gap in price. You can find the same thing in other engines. I have spoken to some who own Volvo engines and they seem to like them, especially the fuel mileage. If I would consider any proprietary engine it would be Volvo.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Oso View Post
One of the reasons that I ask is that I've seen a lot of Volvos in the Toronto area (they seem to be just as popular as Freightliner & International) and I wonder if they've built up a good network in this area. I know that many Volvo's have a Cummins, but I've also seen a lot with D13's.
The situation may be a little different in Canada. If you stay mostly around Toronto then it might work for you to have a brand specific engine. Toronto is a big city and should have a good supply of parts if there are a lot of the brand in the area. That is something to check if you are considering purchasing one of them.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Oso View Post
You're a storehouse of good info GMAN! Cheers!
I am glad to help, Oso.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-02-2009, 03:23 AM
rank's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

>1. Generally speaking, does travelling on a freeway versus a 2 lane highway or country road affect your cost per mile? I’m thinking of the effects of lower speed & aerodynamics versus travelling on rougher pavement.
Depends. For a given terrain, stopping and starting is probably the biggest mileage killer. Then speed. And don't forget OOR miles. Not uncommon for a company driver to drive 10% more miles on the same run as a smart operator.

>2. How much would you recommend spending on your 1st truck (i.e East-coast tractor w. sleeper, 80-90k gvw)? What sort of mileage/wear and tear could you reasonably expect? I've read that one should start with a solid but no frills aero truck - which makes sense to me.
Get what you need and no more.

>3. As an independent, is there money to be made in regional trucking (i.e within Ontario/Quebec)? Or does one have to go OTR to make ends meet?
ON-QC rates suck.

>4. I've also been playing with load boards - but I can't see any of the rates. So, in the Ontario/Quebec region can you make decent money on runs that take you into rural areas, or is the money mostly in traveling on major highways to big cities? (I'm also assuming that you wouldn't take a rural job unless you could also find another load nearby that would get you home.)
ON - QC rates suck

5. I see a lot of flatbeds with odd shaped loads. Is it possible or desirable to improve your aerodynamics by tarping? How much of an effect might that have?
You need to tarp a load. Nobody does that unless they have to.

6. Curiosity: are northern trucks rustproofed (ie oil coated) on a regular basis - like we do for our cars?
I've never heard of that. But I wonder about those electrical anti corrosion systems.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-02-2009, 05:01 AM
Oso's Avatar
Oso Oso is offline
Rookie
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rank View Post
>2. How much would you recommend spending on your 1st truck (i.e East-coast tractor w. sleeper, 80-90k gvw)? What sort of mileage/wear and tear could you reasonably expect? I've read that one should start with a solid but no frills aero truck - which makes sense to me.
Get what you need and no more.
Let's fast forward a few years and assume that the worst of the recession is over. For the sake of argument let's say you have $25-30k for a downpayment and an appropriate amount left over for start-up & operating costs. All other things being equal, would you recommend getting buying a $15-20k truck, a $25-30k truck, or taking out a loan and getting something newer - say a $50k truck. Assume each has identical specs and an average amount of wear and tear.



Quote:
Originally Posted by rank View Post
>3. As an independent, is there money to be made in regional trucking (i.e within Ontario/Quebec)? Or does one have to go OTR to make ends meet?
ON-QC rates suck.
So if you were in Ontario and wanted to make some decent coin but not be out too long what routes would be attractive?

Also, I know that ON-QC rates suck now - but were they decent before the bust?

Last edited by Oso; 06-02-2009 at 06:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.