|
|
06-05-2009, 12:39 AM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMAN
I bought a 53' step deck a few years ago. There have been a few loads that I have gotten due in part to the 42' lower deck. I have 11' on top....
|
What do you guys think of having the upper deck as short as 8'? If my wheelbase is 230", can such a short upper deck cause the trailer to hit the rear fenders of the truck?
|
06-05-2009, 12:49 AM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropdecks
53 combo for me. Add some levelers and you can carry 60' long without a permit in a lot of states.
|
How important is the total weight for the stepdeck trailer? All steel ones with wooden floor are so much cheaper. My company requires flats not heavier than 11k lbs, but when I talked to the fleet manager he didn't mention anything like that for a stepdeck, just recommended a 48' transcraft combo. I'd think the weight capacity isn't as important for a step as for a flat. Am I right or wrong?
|
06-05-2009, 01:45 AM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tracer
What do you guys think of having the upper deck as short as 8'? If my wheelbase is 230", can such a short upper deck cause the trailer to hit the rear fenders of the truck?
|
I think it would create problems. I slid my 5th wheel about 5 notches fwd the other day and if I had an 8' deck I think it would have hit.
|
06-05-2009, 01:52 AM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,079
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tracer
How important is the total weight for the stepdeck trailer? All steel ones with wooden floor are so much cheaper. My company requires flats not heavier than 11k lbs, but when I talked to the fleet manager he didn't mention anything like that for a stepdeck, just recommended a 48' transcraft combo. I'd think the weight capacity isn't as important for a step as for a flat. Am I right or wrong?
|
Weight is really important for me. Just offloaded two loads this AM. One was a Link Belt 210LX and it weighed 49,000 lbs. The other step had a wheel loader and a dozer that totaled 45,000. You can compete with RGN freight because they can't scale 49,000. You can compete with extendable double drops because regular double drops don't have 42' long decks. The wheel loader was 10' - 7" high by the way.
I shouldn't be telling you this because you run my lanes LOL.
All combos are not created equal. Some only have a aluminum floor and the rest of the trailer is steel. Others have a wood deck and they can be heavy. They also have different cross member spacings and thicknesses. I have heard Transcraft are not solidly built....but that is just hearsay.
Last edited by rank; 06-05-2009 at 01:56 AM.
|
06-05-2009, 04:51 AM
|
Board Regular
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the back of your mind
Posts: 421
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMAN
For instance, there is one area of California that restricts trailer length to 45'.
|
Where is that?
__________________
The Big Engines
In the Night-
The Diesel on the Pass
-Jack Kerouac, "Mexico City Blues"
|
06-05-2009, 05:28 PM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rank
I think it would create problems. I slid my 5th wheel about 5 notches fwd the other day and if I had an 8' deck I think it would have hit.
|
So what do you think is the OPTIMUM LENGTH for the upper deck? 10'? 11'? I never pulled a stepdeck before, hence all the stupid questions. I did flatbed last summer, and the rest of the time it was dry van. Worked a 5 ton roll-off tow-truck for 2.5 years though in Toronto, ON ... that gave me lots of experience with smaller machinery and equipment: bobcats, scissorlifts, mini-exacavators etc. Loved working with them.
|
06-07-2009, 03:48 AM
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 90
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I would run as shallow kingpin setting as practical (18-20") with a 10' upper deck and a 40' lower deck and a 10'1" spread. I know before we would get containers out of Baltimore for decent money because they were high cube units and wouldn't go on a flat. If your truck carries a lot of weight on the front axle you could get away with a shorter upper deck because you won't have run your fifth wheel so far ahead. When I pulled a step I was always wishing the upper deck was longer.
__________________
Tough times don't last..Tough people DO!!! Trojan S.C.D.
|
06-07-2009, 07:59 PM
|
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I prefer an 11' upper deck. It offers greater flexibility. I would not personally buy anything smaller than a 10' upper deck.
|
06-07-2009, 08:47 PM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by specialkay
If your truck carries a lot of weight on the front axle you could get away with a shorter upper deck because you won't have run your fifth wheel so far ahead. When I pulled a step I was always wishing the upper deck was longer.
|
I don't follow the logic here ... So you slide the fifth wheel forward because there's too little weight on the front axle? So you like having a long upper deck so that you can bring the trailer closer to the truck in order to compensate for the lack of weight on the front, which you wouldn't have to deal with if you had a shorter upper deck? Something's amiss here.
|
06-07-2009, 08:48 PM
|
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,316
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMAN
I prefer an 11' upper deck. It offers greater flexibility. I would not personally buy anything smaller than a 10' upper deck.
|
With a 10 ft upper deck, you'd have 43' at the bottom. I thought that would be a plus?
|
|
|
|
|