[kanodogg]

Hello all, I'm on the market right now for possibly a T600 or maybe T800, just wanted to get an idea on what differences these two models have. As far as basic design goes, the shape looks somewhat similar, is the T600 more fuel efficient?

The T800 I'm looking at has 317,000 miles, C-15 motor and 62" sleeper, dealer asking 46,900 (it's a 2005).

The T600 has 330,000 miles, c-15 motor and 72" sleeper, dealer asking 54,000 and it is also a 2005.

On the surface to me the T800 seems like more of a deal than the T600, just wanted to get the opinion of some fellow truckers that may have had experience with either model.

Truck I'm replacing is a 2002 KW t2000 which was totalled after being hit by a drunk driver headon. Wound up being allright though, since insurance is paying me 29,000 for that truck which had 800,000 miles on it, can't really complain.


Any help appreciated, Thanks.

[Rev.Vassago]

The difference is in the nose, and (I believe) how far the steer axle is set forward. I believe the T600 has a longer nose than the T800. I've driven both, and I personally prefer the T800.

I wouldn't buy anything with a Cat in it myself, though. I'm still predicting that the price of parts will shoot through the roof.

Personally I hate both trucks, T800s are very uncomfortable (for me) to drive for long periods of time (leg room issues). I ran team with a T600 for a while, only real complaint there was due to the size of the truck I felt cramped in overall space (I came out of a Columbia prior). Have you driven these trucks at all to be sure you would like them? Its a big change from the openness of a t2000

[heavyhaulerss]

In these times you should be able to get a better deal. imo a det would get u beter mpg.

[Sparks280zt]

I always love how people complain about there not being much room in the KWs (other than the football helmet t2000) I have driver both, they are identical other than the t600 axle is a bit further out and the hood is different. I think a t800 looks better and it is more of a tough looking work truck I think. Anyays, I rather have a KW with NO room in it than a Freighshaker with all the room in the world, I prefer quality!

[kanodogg]

thanks for the replies guys.. MPG is not so much of an issue, the t2000 that i had before also had a c15-475 cat and fuel economy was good enough. nothing against detroit or cummins though everyone i know that has trucks w/ those engines are ready to bury them at 700k+ whereas that cat that i had was solid even at about 800k. know loads of people with columbia/centurys and those things are always in the shop.

i think i'm gonna go with the t800, i run regional so space is not much of an issue, again, thanks for the replies.

[allan5oh]

the c15 you currently own is totally different from the c15 in those trucks.

[kanodogg]

allan5oh, could you please elaborate, how is the c15 in that t2000 different from the t800 one? For better or worse? Thanks.

[allan5oh]

It's the model year, not the make and model of the truck, that makes the difference.

Starting in 2003 were the "EPA" engines. Cat went with ACERT. Your engine now has a single turbo, the ACERTS ha ve two turbos, called sequential turbos(some people mistakenly call it twin turbo).

Fuel mileage with these new engines is not as good as the old engines. Plus going from your aerodynamic t2000 to a less aerodynamic t600 and an even less aerodynamic t800 will hurt things.

It's very unfortunate that your truck is totaled, because now you're under the gun. Please take your time looking for trucks.

One thing I would recommend, and that could eliminate either or even both trucks, is a full ECM printout. This printout will have the lifetime fuel mileage on it(although it's not always 100% accurate) it will give you an idea.

[kanodogg]

allan5oh, could you please elaborate, how is the c15 in that t2000 different from the t800 one? For better or worse? Thanks.