how old is to old
#12
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 658
I would run...as fast as you could away from a carrier that won't let you lease onto them unless your truck is such and such age. That means they kow you have a fat payment, and want to keep you under their thumb.
__________________
Save a drum......bang a trucker!
#13
I think that some companies want trucks to be less than x amount of years old because they probably want trucks that look newer and up to date. Just kind of a image thing. I personally wouldn't care what year your truck was as long as it was kept up. I would like to see someone pull up with a shiny K100 or needle nose pete every now and then.
__________________
Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.
#14
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 658
My truck is a '95 and is clean inside and out. It's not immaculate, but yo uwould never know it had 1.3 million miles on it. I'd say it's because they know someone with...say, a paid for truck might not feel the need to run as hard to move the companies freight, as a fella with a $2k a month truck payment..THAT guy is going to run alot harder, and move more freight, equalling more money in said companies pocket. I think it goes beyond image, because a 10 year old truck can be just as nice as a brand new one appearance wise....
__________________
Save a drum......bang a trucker!
#15
That is because you take care of your truck. I have seen trucks newer than yours that look alot worse inside and out. The image thing I think is only a possibility of why they want trucks only so old. The other may be dependability. Not everybody keeps their truck the same mechanically. I think companies want trucks that aren't going to be broke down every week, and usually that means a newer truck. It would be on the average I guess. Would you say that a newer or older truck would be more prone to breakdowns?
__________________
Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.
#17
Originally Posted by allan5oh
No.
Older(5+ years) trucks properly taken care of will be more reliable then a 2-3 year old truck that's neglected.
__________________
"I love college football. It's the only time of year you can walk down the street with a girl in one arm and a blanket in the other, and nobody thinks twice about it." --Duffy Daugherty
#18
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Why not? All the bugs will be worked out of the truck.
The owner will have put together a maintenance program specific to his truck. Warranty is irrelevant. The only way I can see your point is if the owner has ZERO time to maintain the truck.
#19
Originally Posted by allan5oh
No.
Older(5+ years) trucks properly taken care of will be more reliable then a 2-3 year old truck that's neglected.
__________________
Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.
#20
Board Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaffney, SC
Posts: 235
Just to stir the pot further....
For new, unconnected O/Os, I would say that they have less choice in the matter b/c of company policies etc... On the topic; our new truck ('07 that we thankfully sold) was in the shop at least monthly for little nit-picky crap. Mostly things that I would not have even bothered with on an older truck, meaning I would fix them at my liesure or without shop help, but b/c of warranty issues it has to go in before XXX mileage or time. My new truck was not a bit more reliable than my million mile+ truck that I sold to buy the new one, matter of fact it wasn't 1/2 the truck. They were both W900s, the quality change in 11 years was pathetic!! In the last 3 years my '96 had 2 unscheduled issues; a tensioner pulley bearing and a wheel seal. The '07 lost a wheel seal @ less than 50k, a wheel @ 100k, the headlights @ 85k, the AC @ 100k, along with numerous little things and routine maintenance figured in... it rarely went more than 3 wks without a trip to a shop. I see lots of 5 yr old or newer trucks that are JUNK inside and out so age is certainly not the only factor. I, like another poster, would not consider leasing to a carrier that dictated the age, size, weight or any other aspect of my equipment other than it be presentable and able to pass a DOT inspection. We do run team, sometimes 5-7k miles per wk. We replaced the '07 with an '87 that we are restoring and a '92 that we spent a week going over then put on the road. I'm MUCH more comfortable, the quality is MUCH better and I'm sans truck payments again (the way I like it). Also, if you're the least bit mechanically inclined or just prefer to do your own work so that you know it's done right; it's much easier to work on older equipment. When the '07 had wiring issues there was nothing I could do but sit and wait for daylight to limp into the nearest dealer; if the headlights go out on the '92 I can run a hot lead to them and keep going until I have time to deal with it; preferably NOT under a load or at the mercy of a dealer. ...also if my '07 W900 was that much of a piece of junk, just how bad would one of the cheap brands be?? SCARY!
__________________
$$$$ NOT miles |

