how old is to old

Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 07-24-2007, 11:22 AM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 35
Default

20 is too old.

After 19, the magic is gone.
 
  #12  
Old 07-24-2007, 11:51 AM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 658
Default

I would run...as fast as you could away from a carrier that won't let you lease onto them unless your truck is such and such age. That means they kow you have a fat payment, and want to keep you under their thumb.
 
__________________
Save a drum......bang a trucker!

  #13  
Old 07-24-2007, 12:57 PM
Jumbo's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096
Default

I think that some companies want trucks to be less than x amount of years old because they probably want trucks that look newer and up to date. Just kind of a image thing. I personally wouldn't care what year your truck was as long as it was kept up. I would like to see someone pull up with a shiny K100 or needle nose pete every now and then.
 
__________________
Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.
  #14  
Old 07-24-2007, 02:35 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 658
Default

My truck is a '95 and is clean inside and out. It's not immaculate, but yo uwould never know it had 1.3 million miles on it. I'd say it's because they know someone with...say, a paid for truck might not feel the need to run as hard to move the companies freight, as a fella with a $2k a month truck payment..THAT guy is going to run alot harder, and move more freight, equalling more money in said companies pocket. I think it goes beyond image, because a 10 year old truck can be just as nice as a brand new one appearance wise....
 
__________________
Save a drum......bang a trucker!

  #15  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:12 PM
Jumbo's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096
Default

That is because you take care of your truck. I have seen trucks newer than yours that look alot worse inside and out. The image thing I think is only a possibility of why they want trucks only so old. The other may be dependability. Not everybody keeps their truck the same mechanically. I think companies want trucks that aren't going to be broke down every week, and usually that means a newer truck. It would be on the average I guess. Would you say that a newer or older truck would be more prone to breakdowns?
 
__________________
Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.
  #16  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:13 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

No.

Older(5+ years) trucks properly taken care of will be more reliable then a 2-3 year old truck that's neglected.
 
  #17  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:24 PM
mike3fan's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,777
Default

Originally Posted by allan5oh
No.

Older(5+ years) trucks properly taken care of will be more reliable then a 2-3 year old truck that's neglected.
true,but a 5 year old truck with 5 year old typical mileage will not hold up long to running 6-7,000 miles a week.
 
__________________
"I love college football. It's the only time of year you can walk down the street with a girl in one arm and a blanket in the other, and nobody thinks twice about it." --Duffy Daugherty


  #18  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:31 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

Why not? All the bugs will be worked out of the truck.

The owner will have put together a maintenance program specific to his truck.

Warranty is irrelevant.

The only way I can see your point is if the owner has ZERO time to maintain the truck.
 
  #19  
Old 07-24-2007, 04:39 PM
Jumbo's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Wisconsin
Posts: 2,096
Default

Originally Posted by allan5oh
No.

Older(5+ years) trucks properly taken care of will be more reliable then a 2-3 year old truck that's neglected.
That would be correct. But, what if it were the other way around. That is why I said as an average. That is why people trade up. Usually because their older truck starts to nickle and dime them.
 
__________________
Don't trust anybody. Especially that guy in the mirror.
  #20  
Old 07-25-2007, 02:27 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaffney, SC
Posts: 235
Default

Just to stir the pot further....

For new, unconnected O/Os, I would say that they have less choice in the matter b/c of company policies etc...

On the topic; our new truck ('07 that we thankfully sold) was in the shop at least monthly for little nit-picky crap. Mostly things that I would not have even bothered with on an older truck, meaning I would fix them at my liesure or without shop help, but b/c of warranty issues it has to go in before XXX mileage or time. My new truck was not a bit more reliable than my million mile+ truck that I sold to buy the new one, matter of fact it wasn't 1/2 the truck. They were both W900s, the quality change in 11 years was pathetic!!

In the last 3 years my '96 had 2 unscheduled issues; a tensioner pulley bearing and a wheel seal. The '07 lost a wheel seal @ less than 50k, a wheel @ 100k, the headlights @ 85k, the AC @ 100k, along with numerous little things and routine maintenance figured in... it rarely went more than 3 wks without a trip to a shop.

I see lots of 5 yr old or newer trucks that are JUNK inside and out so age is certainly not the only factor. I, like another poster, would not consider leasing to a carrier that dictated the age, size, weight or any other aspect of my equipment other than it be presentable and able to pass a DOT inspection.

We do run team, sometimes 5-7k miles per wk. We replaced the '07 with an '87 that we are restoring and a '92 that we spent a week going over then put on the road. I'm MUCH more comfortable, the quality is MUCH better and I'm sans truck payments again (the way I like it).

Also, if you're the least bit mechanically inclined or just prefer to do your own work so that you know it's done right; it's much easier to work on older equipment. When the '07 had wiring issues there was nothing I could do but sit and wait for daylight to limp into the nearest dealer; if the headlights go out on the '92 I can run a hot lead to them and keep going until I have time to deal with it; preferably NOT under a load or at the mercy of a dealer.

...also if my '07 W900 was that much of a piece of junk, just how bad would one of the cheap brands be?? SCARY!
 
__________________
$$$$ NOT miles

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -12. The time now is 07:21 AM.

Top