MPG VS. SPEED

  #71  
Old 07-05-2007, 11:04 AM
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Greenville, NH
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by solo379
Originally Posted by serbie
Spec's and speed will determine your mpg. Simple, easy fact.
Good post, Serbie! 8)

It's also important, how you get to that "speed", be gentle with that pedal, it's not a NASCAR!
Keep it steady, remember,"up and down", cost you money!
And that's exactly what I'm talking about. I see people @ my terminal.. bob tailing.. bringing the RPM'S to the limiter... THEY ARE IN THE YARD?!?!

I use just enough peddle to get the truck rolling.. when I can.. grab the next gear with lugging the hell out of the motor and do it again.. till I'm up to road speed.. then maintain that speed with as little peddle as possible.
 
__________________
Don't drive like an ass!

  #72  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:59 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Effort, PA
Posts: 222
Default

Did allan post something???

It must be hard work to be so dumb allan but I admire your persistence. Typical super trucker who knows everything.... :roll:
 
__________________
Lets go....
  #73  
Old 07-06-2007, 02:18 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

There you go with your ad hom attacks again. Sorry, I'm not going to stoop to your level.

Again, I ask for you to participate in the debate, and counter my points. So far you've acted like a 13 year old kid.

anyways, until you bring up some valid points, I'm done here.
 
  #74  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:52 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Effort, PA
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by allan5oh
There you go with your ad hom attacks again. Sorry, I'm not going to stoop to your level.

Again, I ask for you to participate in the debate, and counter my points. So far you've acted like a 13 year old kid.

anyways, until you bring up some valid points, I'm done here.
Quit crying allan and if you think I'm attacking you then that is sad. You tell me to offer valid points and to counter your points. Well you haven't made ANY, you just throw crap out in the air and hope some one catches it.

And it's about time your done here, it less garbage to sift through.
 
__________________
Lets go....
  #75  
Old 07-06-2007, 08:17 PM
Guest
Guest
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't waste your time Allan. I think most everyone on here agrees with you.
 
  #76  
Old 07-07-2007, 06:57 AM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Effort, PA
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by SteveBooth
Don't waste your time Allan. I think most everyone on here agrees with you.
That's just sad if you guys agree him 100%. I said it before that in some applications slowing down does save fuel, but in others it does not. How hard is that to understand.... seriously.
 
__________________
Lets go....
  #77  
Old 07-07-2007, 01:45 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

Originally Posted by jegzus
Originally Posted by SteveBooth
Don't waste your time Allan. I think most everyone on here agrees with you.
That's just sad if you guys agree him 100%. I said it before that in some applications slowing down does save fuel, but in others it does not. How hard is that to understand.... seriously.
and you completely failed to give a decent example, or even sound logic. You stated that you worked for a nascar team, and two different cars on two different tracks got the same fuel mileage. That doesn't even begin to apply to the real world.

If you think that a car/truck can get the same fuel mileage at 70 mph then at 60 mph, your a complete fucking moron. That's all there is to it. One truck, not two different trucks, ONE truck. Slow it down to 55 mph, and it will even get better fuel mileage. If it's geared incorrectly, you can drop it to 12th gear and still get better fuel mileage. I've tried this several times.

So what can you bring to the table other then your "stupid" comments? So far you've completely struck out.
 
  #78  
Old 07-07-2007, 01:58 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
  #79  
Old 07-07-2007, 02:16 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Effort, PA
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by jegzus
Originally Posted by allan5oh
If I'm not right about this, counter my points, and refrain from ad hom attacks.
I have countered your weak points already there is nothing more that I need to counter. And if you think I'm attacking you, then you are definitely in the wrong profession.

You have offered nothing but your opinion and a reference to an article that you read somewhere and that is all. If going slower saves you fuel in your vehicles that is fine and dandy. But that is not always the case, just like in my 97' ford dually power stroke, i got better fuel mileage at 72 than I did from 60 up to 72. So hmmmm looks like you were right.

As I said get over yourself, you do not know everything. I know it's hard to believe being a trucker and everything but the sooner you realize that the better it will be for everyone.


Hmmm I have PERSONAL experience with getting better fuel mileage by going faster. Oh and here is the biggest thing in that brochure.....

Originally Posted by Kenworth brochure Driver tips
Maintain optimal RPM for the specific engine. Each engine has a unique torque curve. Drivers should operate at the appropriate RPM to maintain speed
and maximize fuel economy as recommended by their engine manufacturer. This range is typically between 1,200 and 1,600 RPM’s.
So your saying that if in high gear my sweet spot is 65-68mph I should slow down and run below that to get the best fuel mileage??? In all that aerodynamic hog wash even they say to follow the ENGINE's manufactures recommendations for best fuel economy. So what now all knowing super trucker?
 
__________________
Lets go....
  #80  
Old 07-07-2007, 04:05 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Default

Originally Posted by jegzus
So your saying that if in high gear my sweet spot is 65-68mph I should slow down and run below that to get the best fuel mileage??? In all that aerodynamic hog wash even they say to follow the ENGINE's manufactures recommendations for best fuel economy. So what now all knowing super trucker?
Ah hah! Sweet spot is NOT where you get the best fuel mileage.

The sweet spot is the best compromise between fuel mileage and pulling ability.

Also, the sweet spot changes depending on the load of the engine. Notice that engine manufacturers recommend a higher cruise rpm for heavy haul applications. Do you think it will get better fuel mileage? No it will not, it's a compromise between mileage and gradability. The same can be applied to speed. You'll need more rpms to run at 75 then you would at 55.

Show me anywhere that states running slightly below or below the sweet spot will result in worse fuel mileage. I'm begging you.

And yes, if you slowed down, you would get better fuel mileage. Try doing a few repeatable tests, eliminating variation (temperature, weight, wind, driving habits, overfilling the tanks, always filling up at the same spot). You'll be surprised.[/i]
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -12. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Top