User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 09-06-2006, 04:31 PM
Fishhook's Avatar
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

We had one in a Sterling ()It had good power....BUT, parts are $$$$, Sterling dealers are a JOKE, you have to go to Detroit Diesel to get anything fixed.Parts are not stocked.If you do get one, keep an eye on the fuel lines, they rub on the block, causing holes in the lines. The truck we had here ,2 times.Another location 6 times!!( horrible design).We cant give them away.I'm not sure if its the Sterling or the Mercedes part that scares people away.Both, I'm thinkin'.

As far as the Jakes, there is a recall on that( at least the older ones).
__________________
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-06-2006, 09:31 PM
uncleal13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Humboldt, SK
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Well thanks all for your input.
I took possession of my new 06 Century 450 Mercedes, 18 D/O, 3.58, 11R22.5 on 11 August. Have 9,500 miles on it so far.
Took 46,000 Edmonton to Palm Springs = 5.76 US mpg
15,000 Los Angleles to Cornwall, On = 7.45
5,000 Gatineu, QC to Edmonton, AB = 7.32
36,000 Edmonton to Amarillo, TX = 5.96
It's a bit of a dog on the hills, but with the tall gearing I was expecting that. Especially compared to my last truck with the 565hp ISX & 4.10 rears.
I like the engine brake, nice and quiet. To make it work I have to drop a full gear at highway speeds.

Again thanks for your comments.
Al
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-06-2006, 10:37 PM
Bushpilot's Avatar
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Whiting, Indiana
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

yes, jacobs uses the exhaust valves as part of the engine braking but not the exhaust itself as mercedes does. thier exhaust brake is strictly from the exhaust. it has a butterfly valve on the back side of the turbo. this is why you have to use higher rpm's to get the maximum braking. It is however alot better on the engine than a jacobs engine brake is.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-07-2006, 02:15 AM
yoopr's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,859
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleal13
Well thanks all for your input.
I took possession of my new 06 Century 450 Mercedes, 18 D/O, 3.58, 11R22.5 on 11 August. Have 9,500 miles on it so far.
Took 46,000 Edmonton to Palm Springs = 5.76 US mpg
15,000 Los Angleles to Cornwall, On = 7.45
5,000 Gatineu, QC to Edmonton, AB = 7.32
36,000 Edmonton to Amarillo, TX = 5.96
It's a bit of a dog on the hills, but with the tall gearing I was expecting that. Especially compared to my last truck with the 565hp ISX & 4.10 rears.
I like the engine brake, nice and quiet. To make it work I have to drop a full gear at highway speeds.

Again thanks for your comments.
Al
KM's I hope? :P
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-16-2006, 01:40 AM
uncleal13's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Humboldt, SK
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Lbs in the box.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-16-2006, 03:00 AM
Overloaded's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushpilot
yes, jacobs uses the exhaust valves as part of the engine braking but not the exhaust itself as mercedes does. thier exhaust brake is strictly from the exhaust. it has a butterfly valve on the back side of the turbo. this is why you have to use higher rpm's to get the maximum braking. It is however alot better on the engine than a jacobs engine brake is.
Can you explain how a jake brake harms an engine? I can see no possible way it could. The only thing it does is open the exhaust valves.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-16-2006, 03:03 AM
Windwalker's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Been there and gone...
Posts: 6,412
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uncleal13
Well thanks all for your input.
I took possession of my new 06 Century 450 Mercedes, 18 D/O, 3.58, 11R22.5 on 11 August. Have 9,500 miles on it so far.
Took 46,000 Edmonton to Palm Springs = 5.76 US mpg
15,000 Los Angleles to Cornwall, On = 7.45
5,000 Gatineu, QC to Edmonton, AB = 7.32
36,000 Edmonton to Amarillo, TX = 5.96
It's a bit of a dog on the hills, but with the tall gearing I was expecting that. Especially compared to my last truck with the 565hp ISX & 4.10 rears.
Since when is 3:58 tall gears? I've got 3:42, and with 35,000 LBs in the box, from WI to CT, averaged 7.16 mph. With 45,000 in the box, I average about 6.5 mpg. Looking at your mpg, I think I'll stick to my N-14. If I have to down shift, it's generally only 1 gear and keep on climbing.

Rocky... I have a problem with your theory of keeping it above the torque range. When climbing a hill, and keeping the engine above 2,100, what happens when the engine starts to drop rpm? You're going to get well into the torque range before you can really downshift. I know a few of the "hills" in your area. With a good load on, you're going to drop 2 and even 3 gears before you get to the top. Do you let it drop to 2,000, then shift down and let it turn at 2,400?????? Or do you drop the speed in "steps"??? I know my mechanic says I can let it crank up to 3,500, but with this type of engine, I NEVER have it cranking over 2,000. NEVER!!!!
__________________
( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)
YES ! ! ! There is life after trucking.
a GOOD life

Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.