User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 04-12-2009, 11:45 PM
Heavy Duty's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 414
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Part Time Dweller View Post
And we all know that a broker like CH would never threaten to keep money from a carrier if all the hoops aren't jumped through properly, IE; meeting an unrealistic appointment time that they were informed of at the beginning.

I say good job, If enough of these suits go back on the brokers, then maybe they will be more choosy on who they hire, which hopefully will eliminate some fly by night shoe string 1099 paying no maintenance scumbags O/O's/ fleet operatprs that run down the road at a loss.

The same people we all complain about taking freight too cheap. Anything that helps cut them out is good.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-13-2009, 12:33 AM
belpre122's Avatar
Local Advocate
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Speedway Indiana
Posts: 1,751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Part Time Dweller View Post
And we all know that a broker like CH would never threaten to keep money from a carrier if all the hoops aren't jumped through properly, IE; meeting an unrealistic appointment time that they were informed of at the beginning.

I say good job, If enough of these suits go back on the brokers, then maybe they will be more choosy on who they hire, which hopefully will eliminate some fly by night shoe string 1099 paying no maintenance scumbags O/O's/ fleet operatprs that run down the road at a loss.
Exactly PTD! Accountability. That is what this lawsuit was about. Apparently the jury agreed also.

The sooner that cheapy freight brokers like CH Robinson (Hot 'n Heavy) are called to account for the actions of their sub-contractors (read normally a coolie carrier), the better.

It doesn't happen very often...............but this time passing-the-buck didn't pay off for these charlatans.

We need to see much more of this type legal action towards unseemly freight proprietor(s) and their entities.
__________________
Fuel for free. Pre/Post trip for free. Sit at shipper/receiver for free. "Work 80-100, log 70, get paid for 40." Welcome to OTR coolie carrier truck driving!

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2009, 02:04 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

It really isn't about responsibility. It is about the money. It is about who has the deepest pockets. It is unfortunate that juries will give away the farm just because someone has a lot of resources. I don't see how CH Robinson should have had any liability other than they have deep pockets. It has gotten to the point when it makes no difference whether someone is guilty or not. It is a matter of whether someone can pay.
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.