User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 07-07-2008, 12:54 PM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDiesel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uturn2001
Is it safe: Yes, is it the safest way to go, no.

No matter what trucks do or don't do, no matter how fast they can or can't go you will hear complaining from the 4 wheelers. The trucking industry is in a no win situation when it comes to making the general public happy.

Uh..... Mr. Mom... When was the last time you actually drove a CMV ???
And how is THAT relevant?? There are several posters on this site who are "retired" from trucking. Do they somehow immediately forget everything they ever knew about trucking on the day they park it? :shock:

Must they also surrender their right to give opinions at that same time?

If so..... just WHEN is it that YOU plan to retire? :lol: :lol:
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-07-2008, 01:21 PM
ironeagle_2006's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 751
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Like me who REMEBERS WHEN Scheinder was at 55 Swift at 57 JB at 58 Transport America at 62. Those days that if fuel keeps going up WILL BE HERE again. Back then we called the Drag race when JB pulled out to pass Swift or Swift pulled out to pass the great Pumpkin. The LTL's were all at 59 or less. Try having a truck that ran the speedlimit out west or across TX at 65 when they were a split speed and then having to pass those companies. Yes I may not have driven in almost 8 years however I still have kept current on the DOT regs Big Diesel. Back then you did not need a CBI from hell for a Haz-mat Endorsement you took the test passed it and got it. BTW guys that was less than 10 years ago when all those companies were that slow.
__________________
The orignal Ironeagle2006 Yes I am BACK.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-07-2008, 05:19 PM
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long gone from here
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ironeagle_2006
Like me who REMEBERS WHEN Scheinder was at 55 Swift at 57 JB at 58 Transport America at 62. Those days that if fuel keeps going up WILL BE HERE again. Back then we called the Drag race when JB pulled out to pass Swift or Swift pulled out to pass the great Pumpkin. The LTL's were all at 59 or less. Try having a truck that ran the speedlimit out west or across TX at 65 when they were a split speed and then having to pass those companies. Yes I may not have driven in almost 8 years however I still have kept current on the DOT regs Big Diesel. Back then you did not need a CBI from hell for a Haz-mat Endorsement you took the test passed it and got it. BTW guys that was less than 10 years ago when all those companies were that slow.
Since you claim to be current on today's regs..... What is the regulation for " Driving in to a lake with a super-secret haz-mat load ????"

I cannot find that regulation in the little book or the web.....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-08-2008, 03:00 AM
GMAN's Avatar
Administrator
Site Admin
Board Icon
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 17,097
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Several studies have been done that found that variances between trucks and 4 wheelers are more dangerous than if all traffic traveled at the same speed. It has been several years ago, but I believe the American Automobile Association was one of those agencies which did a study on this. In addition, I believe Ontario or one of the Canadian provinces did a study with the same conclusion. I think Virginia also did a study which supports the other two. That is one reason why I was really surprised that Canada would push for split speed limits between trucks and cars. From a safety standpoint, it doesn't make any sense. There must have been a lot of palms greased to get it passed.

From the carrier's point of view, several have lowered the speed on their company trucks. It is their right since it is their property. If they lower the speeds too low then they will present a hazard to traffic. I think all vehicles should be able to do the speed limit in every state in which they travel. Of course, that is one reason several of the large carriers want to force all companies to limit their trucks. They want to minimize the dissatisfaction with the lower speed limits. If all trucks are traveling at the same speed then there would be no reason for drivers to switch to companies who have faster trucks.
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.