No SPEED LIMITS for trucks in CA???????

  #1  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:17 PM
Windwalker's Avatar
Board Icon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Been there and gone...
Posts: 6,414
Default No SPEED LIMITS for trucks in CA???????

End Discrimination By Revoking All Laws
June 7, 2008; Page A10

In the various articles I've read on the recent California Supreme Court decision ("Gay Marriage Returns," Review & Outlook, May 16, Letters, May 24) declaring illegal the California law against gay marriage, many have said that the court had little choice since the California Constitution prohibits "discrimination." As a recent letter to the Journal put it, "the state constitution, as now worded, does not allow voters or legislators to limit by law the rights of any group." Logically, if the claim that the state constitution prohibits discrimination is true, how can any law limiting the exercise of any right or power be constitutional?

If marriage laws cannot limit the rights of gays, it would seem logical that the marriage laws cannot limit the rights of polygamists. If polygamists were to sue for the right to marry more than one partner, would the California Supreme Court rule in their favor? Or does it favor only the politically correct?

If the state constitution does prohibit limiting rights of any group, how can laws against robbery, rape or murder be legal? Do not such laws limit the rights of robbers, rapists and murderers?

Jay Purdy
Omaha, Neb.
Has anyone ever thought of fighting a SPEEDING TICKET in California with this????? :?: :?: :?:
 
__________________
( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)
YES ! ! ! There is life after trucking.
a GOOD life

  #2  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:42 PM
Board Regular
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 213
Default

Probably not, because they don't feel like losing.
 
  #3  
Old 06-07-2008, 01:05 PM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

You try it first. Let us know how it went. :P
 
  #4  
Old 06-07-2008, 03:15 PM
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Default

I would be willing to bet if anyone tried they would lose since the split speed limit law does not say at what rate a travel a person can go at maximum but rather the rate of travel an object is allowed to go.

If a person was able to run 100 miles per hour there would be nothing they could do about it. :wink:
 
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours.
  #5  
Old 06-07-2008, 04:25 PM
golfhobo's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the 19th hole / NC
Posts: 9,647
Default

Actually, as a legal precedent goes.... this question is not so far off!

Couple that with the fact that (as I understand it) California is under pressure to "close the gap" between truck speeds and POV speeds OR lose major amounts of Federal funding for their highways.....

And one MIGHT have a case!

I don't have a link to support the "rumor" I have heard, but I believe it is possibly true. Now.... whether that means that Cali will RAISE the truck speed limit... or LOWER the POV limit, I'm not sure!

However... IF they have received such notification from the Federal government, and are dragging their feet on implementing such a change... it would be quite possible to defeat a speeding ticket based on the failure of the State to "act in good faith" concerning a Federal "directive."

A good lawyer could at least secure a "prayer for judgement continued" in such a case, pending the State's decision and reaction to the Federal stipulation. (IF it is true.)

Anyone ELSE hear about this "requirement" that Cali close the gap or lose federal monies?
 
__________________
Remember... friends are few and far between.

TRUCKIN' AIN'T FOR WUSSES!!!

"I am willing to admit that I was wrong." The Rev.
  #6  
Old 06-07-2008, 05:45 PM
Windwalker's Avatar
Board Icon
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Been there and gone...
Posts: 6,414
Default

Originally Posted by Uturn2001
I would be willing to bet if anyone tried they would lose since the split speed limit law does not say at what rate a travel a person can go at maximum but rather the rate of travel an object is allowed to go.

If a person was able to run 100 miles per hour there would be nothing they could do about it. :wink:
Ahhhh...... But, now, it's the person that is controlling the object in a manner that IT moves at that speed. According to that, it is "unconstitutional" for them to pass a law that limits the persons right to control an object in that manner. And, since it says "group", I believe a substantial percentage of the drivers taking their trucks into and out of CA would also constitute a "group".

I don't believe you could make it cover weight or logbook, but maybe the "BRIDGE LAW".... And, the "IDLE LAW".... :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was a thought... I'm not a lawyer.... :arrow:
 
__________________
( R E T I R E D , and glad of it)
YES ! ! ! There is life after trucking.
a GOOD life

  #7  
Old 06-08-2008, 12:21 AM
Rev.Vassago's Avatar
Guest
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The other side of the coin
Posts: 9,368
Default

I've seen arguments of this nature before, and from what I remember, the term "group" only applied to race, sex, or sexual orientation.
 
  #8  
Old 06-08-2008, 05:56 AM
thebaldeagle655's Avatar
Board Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wichita Falls, Tx
Posts: 413
Default

Unless you can prove that a truck is a race, religion, belief or age, you would lose this one!! Made me laugh though, I just hope the post was a joke and he really wasn't serious, anyone with that little common sense doesn't need to be driving an 80,000 pound vehicle!
 
  #9  
Old 06-24-2008, 05:11 AM
worldisnotenough's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 515
Default

Originally Posted by thebaldeagle655
Unless you can prove that a truck is a race, religion, belief or age, you would lose this one!! Made me laugh though, I just hope the post was a joke and he really wasn't serious, anyone with that little common sense doesn't need to be driving an 80,000 pound vehicle!
My truck is a transformer! it is alive. Whether a unit is based on carbon or Silicone should make no difference to how it should be treated. All units that think should be treated with respect.
 
  #10  
Old 06-24-2008, 07:16 AM
mike3fan's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,777
Default

Originally Posted by thebaldeagle655
anyone with that little common sense doesn't need to be driving an 80,000 pound vehicle!
We are now gonna judge who can drive a truck based on their common sense?

Talk about a driver shortage........ :roll:
 
__________________
"I love college football. It's the only time of year you can walk down the street with a girl in one arm and a blanket in the other, and nobody thinks twice about it." --Duffy Daugherty



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Top