User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 09-30-2007, 02:29 AM
Uturn2001's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by terrylamar
This only applies to US Fish and Wildlife employees. I cannot find any regulation that applies to Motor Carriers that prohibit the use of snap/lever binders. I am most interested because TMC issues snap binders and I make extensive use of them. They are dangerous when improperly used. I personally have never had a problem with them.
Terry is correct.

From the same web site:
Quote:
1.2 To whom do these chapters apply? The chapters in Part 243 apply to Service employees and volunteers who operate motorized vehicles and equipment and their project leaders and supervisors.
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:36 AM
Jackrabbit379's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wichita Falls,Tx
Posts: 7,197
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by COLT
I'm a Tanker guy, but boomers are used here in Canada, after tightening, they must be tied off with wire, as far as I know...
It's always wise to keep some baling wire for that jaw breaking :P handle.
__________________


http://watsonsysco.com/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-30-2007, 05:34 AM
COLT's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FT ST JOHN
Posts: 649
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Well the guy's that I see around the yard and wherever, crank the boomer tight with a snipe, then slap the boomer handle with the snipe, keeping anything "important" out of the way, they use a double piece of wire to tie the handle closed. Repeat, and rinse.... :wink:
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:59 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Well if that is true Uturn and Terry, then several DOT guys in VA are playing by their own rules.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:07 PM
terrylamar's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,567
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
Well if that is true Uturn and Terry, then several DOT guys in VA are playing by their own rules.
This is like the gun issue. Everyone is convinced that it is illegal to carry in a commercial vehicle, but there is no federal regulation prohibiting it. I have not done a complete search of alll regulations so I don't know this for a fact yet, but I am beginning to have my doubts. I would think TMC would be up on the facts and would have told us if it was illegal.
__________________
Terry L. Davis
O/O with own authority
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:56 PM
Uturn2001's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
Well if that is true Uturn and Terry, then several DOT guys in VA are playing by their own rules.
That could be, or it could be Virginia has adopted a state law against them.
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-02-2007, 07:01 PM
eplurubus's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: colorado
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Thanks for everyone's comments. I sent this question to the Colorado State Patrol Motor Carrier Safety department and this is the response that I received:

"Thank you for your question regarding load binders. I would like to speak with you regarding this question so please contact me at (deleted phone number).

In your question I felt that you were refering to "Boomers" which is a securement device that a person has to use a cheater bar to bind. The regulations stating that all tiedowns must be adjustable is 393.112.

This regulation states that all tiedowns must be adjustable while the vehicle is in transit. It is my opinion that a "Boomer" is adjustable simply because a driver may adjust it by switching chain loops. In order to tighten the load the CMV must be stopped no matter which binder is being used. Therefore a person can adjust while in transit from point A to point B.

I hope this was helpful. Please let me know if you have any questions."

Here he says it is "his opinion" that a boomer, or lever-type chain binder, is an adjustable and acceptable tiedown device. However, there is no regulation in the FMCSA rulebook (I just read the whole thing), nor is there any ammendment to a regulation, that states boomers/lever chain binders are illegal or in any way not D.O.T. approved.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-02-2007, 08:52 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

That's cool, I'm going to email VA and see what they say as far as state regs go. If they ain't illegal, they should be, dangerous SOB's when they decide to fight back on you.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-02-2007, 10:47 PM
Uturn2001's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Central IL between the corn and the beans
Posts: 4,977
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
That's cool, I'm going to email VA and see what they say as far as state regs go. If they ain't illegal, they should be, dangerous SOB's when they decide to fight back on you.
I agree which is why I always tried to get by with straps when I flatbedded, though sometimes I had to use chains. The company I drove for only issued the lever type binders, and there were a few times I came close to getting popped by one even though I was taking every precaution possible.

IMHO the ratchet type, while not only safer, allows for better load securement as you may be able to tighten that chain just a bit more than the lever type.
__________________
Finding the right trucking company is like finding the right person to marry. I really comes down to finding one whose BS you can put up with and who can put up wih yours.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-03-2007, 01:37 AM
nrvsreck's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sulphur Springs, TX
Posts: 528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uturn2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Ford95
That's cool, I'm going to email VA and see what they say as far as state regs go. If they ain't illegal, they should be, dangerous SOB's when they decide to fight back on you.
I agree which is why I always tried to get by with straps when I flatbedded, though sometimes I had to use chains. The company I drove for only issued the lever type binders, and there were a few times I came close to getting popped by one even though I was taking every precaution possible.

IMHO the ratchet type, while not only safer, allows for better load securement as you may be able to tighten that chain just a bit more than the lever type.
Agreed. Unless you're a really big SOB, it can be impossible to get out that last little bit of slack with a "boomer". I think they should outlawed.
__________________
CPFR: Certified Professional Freight Relocator
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.