User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 03-11-2007, 03:27 PM
Roadhog's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tartuga .......me thinks
Posts: 9,867
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fozzy
yeah, well, that'll teach me to post with no coffee and no bifocals.. ops:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-11-2007, 04:27 PM
Mr. Ford95's Avatar
Board Icon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orange, VA
Posts: 5,684
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

squirrel, that is also true with passenger vehicles. I ran an average of 86mph on a run down I-81 from 300 miles(thank god no cops were out that day.) Turned around and ran 70 mph back, got better mileage at 86 in my pickup. The engine's tuning was for max mileage at a higher RPM. Did not know that until my dad showed me. My wife's Fusion is the same way. Got better mileage going to Greensboro averaging 68 than averaging 62 coming back.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-12-2007, 04:45 PM
allan5oh's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
Posts: 3,280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrelbait
I once read an interesting tale of finding the "SWEET" spot on the truck. Not every truck is going to get max fuel economy at 55, in this case the guy tried running 55 out to the west coast and then compared it to running 68 mph. The result was he got BETTER fuel mileage at 68 in HIS truck due to the way it was set up.
Another trucker myth. The slower you go, the less HP is "wasted" pushing air. Comparing 2 trips that may or may not be identical is not a very scientific way to do things. You have to take a much larger sample then that.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-15-2007, 12:20 AM
heavyhaulerss's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: north alabama
Posts: 1,200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

well for one thing if your hauling flatbed as i do then loads that are lowest to trailer floor will get 1-2 more miles per gallon than a load that is 10 ft high. i get 7.5 8.6 mpg when hauling skid coils from indy in area to g.r. mi & back at 62 mph on cruise. doing the same run at top end i'll get 5.5-6 m.p.g. i also exccelerate slowly from a stop.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-15-2007, 12:50 AM
marylandkw's Avatar
Senior Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 731
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Default

We had a great topic on this a few months ago, 3 pages long. It even has some good information in it.

http://www.classadrivers.com/phpBB2/...521&highlight=
__________________
Paranoia is nothing more than the pathological habit of paying close attention.
All ideas in this communication are sole property of the voices in my head. (C) 2006, "The Voices" (TM)
Reply With Quote
Reply






Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.