Truck Driving Jobs

|

Trucking Jobs

|

Truck Drivers

|

Trucking Companies

 
New Users Register Free Account Here | Existing Forum Members Log In Here
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Testimonials | Spell Check

Class A Drivers.com

Application          Company Listings          Job Search        Load Board
 
  1.   Welcome to the Truck Driving Message Board - ClassADrivers.

    1. Welcome to Class A Drivers Forums

          Already registered? Login above

      OR
       
      To take advantage of all the site's features, become a member of
      the largest community of Truck Drivers.

      The advertising to the left will not show if you are a registered user.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: California strikes again!

  1. #1
    SoCal79 is offline Member SoCal79 is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    129

    Default California strikes again!

    It seems that they have exhausted all other forms of smog reduction so now they are going after us. Every truck base plated in CA must meet 2007 emissions by 2009,and they want every truck that travels in and out of CA to be able prove a LOW NOX reflash of the computer. I have been making calls to the various Govt. agencies involved and get the same response, that this is real and it is going to happen. Here is a link to an info page (aimed at dump trucks) but you get the idea.

    http://www.cdtoa.org/pdf_gov/CTN_09TruckSurvey.pdf

    Good thing I didn't buy that 95 Pete I was looking at, looks like it will be worhtless in CA by 2010.

  2. #2
    GMAN's Avatar
    GMAN is offline Administrator Board Icon GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. GMAN is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    15,108

    Default

    Perhaps they would prefer to have their own trucks to meet at the border to carry their goods into the state.

  3. #3
    whthorse is offline Rookie whthorse is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Happy Valley, CA
    Posts
    46

    Default

    tell me about it....I have a 1995 freightliner and my baby a 1988 pete... both are gonna be useless. I suppose I could put the upgrade on the freightliner but that cost $20000.00 but my pete is to be scrapped... I'll be out of business...
    and by His stripes we are healed
    IS. 53:5

  4. #4
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default Re: California strikes again!

    Quote Originally Posted by SoCal79
    Every truck base plated in CA must meet 2007 emissions by 2009
    It doesn't really say that. Read it again.

    and they want every truck that travels in and out of CA to be able prove a LOW NOX reflash of the computer.
    For certain year vehicles(92-99) and certain makes. This is because certain makes "skirted" emissions rules and put out basically illegal engines. That's why there was such a huge lawsuit about 8 years ago. Instead of paying the EPA, the engine makers agreed to put that money(HUNDREDS of millions) into producing cleaner engines.

  5. #5
    no_worries is offline Senior Board Member no_worries is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,106

    Default

    While that info isn't exactly correct, it's not too far off. For all intents and purposes, all trucks must meet 2007 emissions equivalents by 2013. The older the truck the sooner it must be in compliance. Of course this is just the proposal as it's currently written. It's to be submitted by the middle of next year, so we'll see what happens.

  6. #6
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whthorse
    tell me about it....I have a 1995 freightliner and my baby a 1988 pete... both are gonna be useless. I suppose I could put the upgrade on the freightliner but that cost $20000.00 but my pete is to be scrapped... I'll be out of business...
    So whats going to become of older trucks going to Calif ??? I have a 86 Pete that I would not give up and have no desire to have or want to buy one of these newer problem-matic computer controlled trucks. :sad:

  7. #7
    whthorse is offline Rookie whthorse is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Happy Valley, CA
    Posts
    46

    Default

    the way it was explained to me anything older than a '92 would have to be scrapped. So what all my friends with older trucks are saying is that they dont want to put any more money into them. even though they have always kept them well maintained. Why put money into a truck the government won't let you keep. Its a shame too cuz most of these trucks are really good, well maintained rigs (like mine). As usual leave it to the government to stick it to the little guy. :evil:
    and by His stripes we are healed
    IS. 53:5

  8. #8
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ash_ca_la
    I have a 86 Pete that I would not give up and have no desire to have or want to buy one of these newer problem-matic computer controlled trucks. :sad:
    Your truck will have to be in compliance by Dec 2009

  9. #9
    PackRatTDI is offline Senior Board Member PackRatTDI is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    1,004

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveBooth
    Quote Originally Posted by ash_ca_la
    I have a 86 Pete that I would not give up and have no desire to have or want to buy one of these newer problem-matic computer controlled trucks. :sad:
    Your truck will have to be in compliance by Dec 2009

    The EPA really needs to yank the CARB exemption from the Clean Air Act. This is getting ridiculous. California is trying to basically legislate in other states and that's overstepping it's bounds. The Federal Government needs to say enough is enough.
    You can take the driver out of the truck but you cant take the truck out of the driver.

  10. #10
    Bandit102's Avatar
    Bandit102 is offline Board Regular Bandit102 is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    338

    Default

    Once it happens in CA, it will blow like a dense, stinking, fog of death to the other states as well.
    1999 FL Classic, N14+ 525 hp, RTLO16-9-13A
    1997 Van's Aircraft RV-6, IO-360

  11. #11
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit102
    Once it happens in CA, it will blow like a dense, stinking, smog of death to the other states as well.
    Fixed.

  12. #12
    SoCal79 is offline Member SoCal79 is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    129

    Default

    It seems to be happening in other states as well,just searching for info on retrofit programs for CA some other states popped up. Alot of people are in panic mode and others dont seem to care or have the attitude that no way they are giving up their trucks. I did speak to a person at CARB and they said that they are open to input from people in the industry because they dont know how it will impact us making a living. He also said that they are under funded and under staffed so dont expect the hammer to drop right away. So I am just going to keep working and fly under the radar unless I get caught in a smoke test. I imagine by 2010 my 79 will be worth nothing in CA.

  13. #13
    Bobby's Avatar
    Bobby is offline Member Bobby is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ca.
    Posts
    165

    Default


  14. #14
    allan5oh is offline Senior Board Member allan5oh is on the right path.  You could probably safely loan them a quarter.
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    jackassville (winnipeg, mb)
    Posts
    3,181

    Default

    The problem is, our trucks contribute massively to smog.

    Catalytic convertors in gasoline engines take care of 99% of the smog forming NOx. They do not have a PM problem.

    Those same convertors do very little in comparison on our trucks.

    I think I read a study somewhere that attributed 80% of smog forming substances(NOx and PM) to heavy trucks.

  15. #15
    Mackman's Avatar
    Mackman is offline Senior Board Member Mackman is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. Mackman is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. Mackman is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street. Mackman is a distinguished poster and probably helps little old ladies across the street.
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Concordville PA
    Posts
    3,659

    Default

    what is trucking becoming. This stuff really gets me worked up big time. God now am all fired the hell up from reading that link. this is all B.S.
    Truck Driving an occupation consisting of hours of boredom interrupted by sheer terror!!

    "All the coolie carriers suck. Log 70, work 80-100, paid for 50." - the Great ColdFrostyMug



  16. #16
    Bandit102's Avatar
    Bandit102 is offline Board Regular Bandit102 is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    338

    Default

    I don't buy it.
    1999 FL Classic, N14+ 525 hp, RTLO16-9-13A
    1997 Van's Aircraft RV-6, IO-360

  17. #17
    Orangetxguy's Avatar
    Orangetxguy is offline Senior Board Member Orangetxguy is well-known and should trademark his/her name. Orangetxguy is well-known and should trademark his/her name. Orangetxguy is well-known and should trademark his/her name. Orangetxguy is well-known and should trademark his/her name. Orangetxguy is well-known and should trademark his/her name. Orangetxguy is well-known and should trademark his/her name.
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,634

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GMAN
    Perhaps they would prefer to have their own trucks to meet at the border to carry their goods into the state.
    Here-Here!!! Make a 25 mile zone like they used to have for the Mexican trucks!!! Let the denizens of LA and Frisco come out to the border areas for their merchandize!!!
    Space...............Is disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence! Star Trek2009

  18. #18
    tinman789 is offline Rookie tinman789 is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    raleigh, nc
    Posts
    48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mackman
    what is trucking becoming. This stuff really gets me worked up big time. God now am all fired the hell up from reading that link. this is all B.S.
    what he said. this is bs!! since i learned that you'd better wash your truck before entering cali or you'll get a dot insp. i decided that anyone who needed me to move anything into or out of cali was going to need to meet me inside the border of a neighboring state.
    it has to be them trying to squeeze us all out to make room for the mexican trucks. jb, schneider and the lot will have a bunch of 5.00 drivers running the road. you watch. in shiny new trucks!!!!

  19. #19
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SteveBooth
    Quote Originally Posted by ash_ca_la
    I have a 86 Pete that I would not give up and have no desire to have or want to buy one of these newer problem-matic computer controlled trucks. :sad:
    Your truck will have to be in compliance by Dec 2009
    Well Steve if thats the way it goes down then I'LL be out of bussiness if it spreads to the other states !!! I can live with-out Calif but if it spreads I'LL be finished. What about all those boys in Calif that have all those old chromed up trucks . Old Diamond Rieos n Macks n Kenworth Pete ect ect ect ??? I've seen some really really old ones late 50's n early sixty's n such !!! A lot of them pull containers out of the ports n such. Haul hay with those single axle cab-overs ect ect !!! My truck can't be compliant with 2007 standards with-out putting a 2007 engine in it ???

  20. #20
    PackRatTDI is offline Senior Board Member PackRatTDI is an unknown poster at this point.  Don't let him/her around power tools just yet.
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    1,004

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ash_ca_la
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveBooth
    Quote Originally Posted by ash_ca_la
    I have a 86 Pete that I would not give up and have no desire to have or want to buy one of these newer problem-matic computer controlled trucks. :sad:
    Your truck will have to be in compliance by Dec 2009
    Well Steve if thats the way it goes down then I'LL be out of bussiness if it spreads to the other states !!! I can live with-out Calif but if it spreads I'LL be finished. What about all those boys in Calif that have all those old chromed up trucks . Old Diamond Rieos n Macks n Kenworth Pete ect ect ect ??? I've seen some really really old ones late 50's n early sixty's n such !!! A lot of them pull containers out of the ports n such. Haul hay with those single axle cab-overs ect ect !!! My truck can't be compliant with 2007 standards with-out putting a 2007 engine in it ???
    It would only affect other states if they adopted CARB standards. Otherwise they have to abide by the regulations set forth by the EPA. That's why the Federal Government needs to step in and yank the CARB exemption, or at least rule that other states that have adopted CARB must now surrender control to the Feds, or at the very minimum, rule that no other states can adopt CARB. CARB was created to deal with the unique situation in southern california that lead to the severe smog in Los Angeles. Those problems do not exist in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont, the 4 other states who have adopted CARB standards. CARB has really become irrelevant as modern technology has made requiring stricter emissions in California rather obsolete. It's more of a bureaucracy and red tape nightmare than an effective organization.
    You can take the driver out of the truck but you cant take the truck out of the driver.

  21. This ad will disappear if you login

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Trucking Companies | Trucking Job Search | Online Job Application | Trucking Links | Truck Drivers Message Board | Contact Us | Site Map


Truck Driving Jobs © 2003 - 2012 ClassADrivers.com
 

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0