Problems of the Universe solved right here on CAD
 

Offer your solution to a problem. :block:
Serious or funny, big or small, real or far fetched...
plenty of topics to cover.

I'll start... how to end the war in Afghanistan.

Lob some dud-nuclear ballistic missiles into the mountains...letting them stick half-way into the ground, proceeding to make a loud ticking sound.
(tick-tick-tick-tick)
Then shoot down everything that comes running out of the mountain. :pissedoff:

How to fix the economy:

Shoot the economists.

just bombard the place with pork chops.

Is this a serious thread? It LOOKED like a serious thread, but doesn't really SMELL like one. I don't know. Hmm..... If I THOUGHT it was a serious thread, I MIGHT offer a serious solution to a problem. But, I just can't be sure.

Considering the source of the thread starter, I just don't know. Hmm.... I think I'll wait awhile and see how it develops.

I'm not as concerned about someone stealing my idea to save the world from nuclear destruction as I am being laughed at for my idea. If this is a joke thread, I don't want to give a serious solution to a major problem.

I will just have to wait and see where this goes.

How to solve arguments with golfhobo:

Apply alcohol, and wait for him to post a rant, thereby getting himself put into time out.

:argue::drunk::booze::cheers::ranting::batman: :flame::banana1:

My first paragraph outlined the answer to your first question.
Another universal problem solved! :block:

Hobo, problems of the Universe are infinite. They can be anything from serious to absurd. I prefer laughable knowledge. :block:

How about 2+2=4 ? Basic assumption...yet false, as 2+2 can not be universally true to be 4.
Maybe in the abstract world of arithmetic, but in our real world, it can not be universally true.
Two tires and two more tires, will not equal four tires.
Each tire is slightly different from the next. How about taking it to a more precise level?
Two precisely engineered objects, will not equal the sum of two other precisely engineered objects, because of differences at the nano-level.

Math can not be applied to a physical relationship, as it is abstract. It is more philosophy.
The laws of math have been imposed on our reality, in which we base our belief in, yet there are deeper realities, and truths.
We have to separate the analytical truth that 2+2=4 with the empirical process of calculation. The inductive observation that 2+2=4
does not require anyone to observe it to be true. It is true independently of our existence and the existence of space-time and matter.
But further, how do you perceive true laws of mathematics? Do you base it on physical life? or artificial intelligence? A computer would
fry itself on such a simple assumption, where as a human will intuit certain truths. We simply apply a false rule that 2+2=4.
Whenever someone asks the question, we simply always answer 4.

To that we have to ask ourselves, is our application for physical relationship? or philosophy? Pure math? or applied math?
2+2=4......only because we believe it to be so.
Truth is...2+2 does not equal 4.

Un=Un-1+Un-2, or the Fibonacci Recurrence of Whole Numbers, is one example of math formula which can rule the outcome and manifestation of the universe.
Plainly put...the lowest common denominator, can rule the outcome of both man and nature.
Man exists and experiences this universe from the 10 to the zero power perspective. One must convert the electromagnetic power that causes the ionization
and polarization that drives the evolution of all things in this universe to a proportion relative to mans perspective.
One must first quantify the "now" in order to mathematically formulate values of the "before now" or "subsequent now".
To do this, we measure or quantify. That is how we base our reality. We measure everything within time and space, according to our perspectives upon a physical
existence. A second is to the building of mans subjective reality as an atom is to the construction of matter.
The second by second choices made within mans subjective reality which causes it to be as it is in any moment or second.

2+2=4 is only subjective.
It is illogical.... Live Long and Prosper.

http://i97.photobucket.com/albums/l2...spacecraft.gif

Not if I engineered them. In that case, 2+2=fire.

How to stop ALL TERRORISM in the world. One flat out say the Next attack on any nation in the world the Muslim religion loses MECCA their Holiest site. If they do not learn the second site to go GLASS is Medina the Birthplace of Medina. So who as a sponsort or leader of Islamic Terrorists would WANT to be responsible for the destruction of their religions holiest sites.

How to Stop Gobal Warming
 

Give me the winter off and have planned and paid for a three month holiday in a warmer climate. (my middle name is Murphy)


:roll:

Originally Posted by Roadhog http://www.classadrivers.com/forum/i...s/viewpost.gif
Two precisely engineered objects, will not equal the sum of two other precisely engineered objects, because of differences at the nano-level.





Close enough for government "work"

How to solve deciphering an ironeagle post:


It cannot be done. Don't bother. Just point and laugh, and think "ping pong balls".

OK, try this one. I need someone to figure out the quantum paradox of the mini black hole that opens up inside any clothes dryer in the world at any given time, for the express purpose of swallowing one sock and one sock only. :confused:

Oh yes PLEASE!!!!

See, this IS serious to me, too. I am a tiny bit OCD when it comes to laundry and I will NOT put a sock in the washer without its mate...ever...I can't do it. However, even this weekend, I got 2 socks out of the washer without their mates! I am so sick of buying socks! I want to know the answer to this!!! I think it's the washer, though...not the dryer...I don't know. Maybe it's a conspiracy.

It is the Great Flamingo Conspiracy.

Do what I do PIN them together. Take a diaper pin and stick them togther. Never lost one learned that one from my grandmother.

Pull all the troops out, and bring them home. Then, find anyone who can fly a plane, or drop a bomb, and blow that whole entire miserable country off the map.

I'd like to see motor vehicles set up with some kind of setting that wouldn't allow the vehicle to turn unless a turn signal was on. I know there would be safety issues in emergencies, but there could be some kind of over-ride if the wheel was jerked too fast or something.


Or if the wheel is turned a certain percentge, the turn signal automatically came on.

That would be nice.
My cousin once told me that he wished he carried a pair of Bolt Cutters. Everytime, someone turned without the use of their turn signal, he could reach in there, and cut off their turn signal lever. :lol:

I just cannot understand what is so freaking hard about using them? Drives me nuts!!!!

Or have a hand come out of the steering wheel and slap them!

http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z...77/1z5m5w0.gif

Yeah, I actually thought about having the steering wheel 'Shock' them if they turned without using a signal, but then they might spill their coffeee or drop their cell phone and sue someone. :D

Are you SURE it is swallowing one sock? Maybe it is producing one extra! Simple solution. Throw away this extra sock. OR.... keep it until the next time you do laundry, then pair it up with the one that is produced THAT time. :lol2:

This is easy to solve.... It was our 7 month old chocolate lab who ate your sock. He ate one of mine last week and ended up needing surgery to remove it from his stomach and intestine....... It came back out intact, just a bit discolored......:hellno: $2300 bucks later..............:pissedoff:

I'm glad to know that someone else is having trouble with the sock thing. I either lose one, or I always end up with an extra one. It's beyond me.http://img2.mysmiley.net/imgs/smile/...nfused0006.gif

The solution is to not wear socks. You're welcome.

but in the winter, my feet get cold. what would i wear with my uggs? :roll:

Wear fuzzy bunny slippers.:thumbsup:

still would need socks and you can't wear those outside, cloth bottoms. sheesh. :hellno:

Learn to fly.:clap:

If monsters under your bed keep you awake at night...solution is simple.
Cut the legs off your bed. :block: :zzz:

Then what would the fuzzy bunnies wear?? Jeez! :rofl:

You can blame Area 51 and DARPA for this. http://www.darpa.mil/
Some time ago, through DOD, a military contract developed a Singularity, quite by accident, really. Although the results favored the project, there were severe side effects. One super-fast AI was created, by DARPA for the US military, and it actually become sentient. It then accelerated exponentially (or "hyper-nentially" as a quantum computer) and left this physical realm completely, with only the shell of its original processing system in place and working as the inventors hoped. Every once in a while, it decides to take up residence in somebody's cell phone or auto ignition system, computer program, cloths dryer, etc. all gremlin-like. This "black hole" grows in intensity each time it appears.

Believe me, I and many of the worlds greatest minds are trying feverishly to contain this Anomaly and use it as a Stargate. I'll try to keep you updated, but first we will have to give members of CAD with over a 4500 post count level 6 NSA clearance. Meanwhile, the Singularity will eat socks. I don't know why. :block:

Tingley Rubbers :p

Wow! Only 5 more posts and I can have a lower NSA clearance level than I already have! :lol

And then what will the Tingleys wear for contraception? :hellno:

Glasses :whistle:

I can buy ammunition for $.25 per round, and saved you $2299.75