It's been raining here

Subscribe
1  2 
Page 2 of 2
Go to
Quote: I agree completely--and I must have missed the TLC show on Ice boring.

So, are they taking some kind of core samples like tree rings---is the ice divided into seasonal- clearly definable "layers"??? I'm wondering how this would work for defining what the actual temperatures have been---to prove "global warming" as a man made event---the ice would have to be in smaller
layers??? since 1900? compared to all previous layers?? and this still wouldn't
prove global warming for sure---only that the region of Greenland had less
moisture(less ice) and/or higher than normal temp. It's too isolated to show a "global picture" are they taking the same samples at the south pole as well? so as to try to match them up--showing a "global" picture.

@RebelDarling Hope you didn't get your shoes wet taking that picture.
sorry, we seem to have hi-jacked this thread
Yeah, Borg.... that's about how it works. I didn't immerse myself in the show, I just registered the basic info. It's very much like tree rings, and it goes back for centuries or maybe eons. But, somehow they can tell by the way the ice melted and refroze, how much of it, etc. IIRC, they can even measure the percentage of "particulates" in the ice, which tells them about volcanic ash in the air and such. It was pretty interesting. Now I wish I'd paid closer attention.

I "think" they are doing the same in other places like Antarctica, but it was obviously easier to get a film crew into Greenland.
Reply
1  2 
Page 2 of 2
Go to