Quote:
That inexperienced Driver had a heavy, top heavy load at night through tricky turns on a wet road. My guess is he found himself going too fast for conditions and either overeacted or reacted too little or too late. Should he have been allowed to drive it while the trainer slept? How should I know? Had he been able to impress the trainer up to that point or was the trainer just lazy? Who knows? When did the poop hit the fan and would the trainer have been able to intervene had he been in the seat? Who knows?
Not all inexperienced Drivers wreck. I didn't. Most don't. A blanket indictment of Swift's training methods is ludicrous. Every major fleet trains the exact same way and enjoy the same rate of success that Swift has. Do a lot of Drivers have negative impressions of Swift training? They sure do. A lot of Drivers have negative opinions about every aspect of the company. I may just fall over dead if I ever hear someone pay Swift a compliment.
As far as the equipment goes, you can have an 80000 lb tractor uprated to 94000 by paying a little extra dough at registration and there are probably plenty of 94000 rated Volvos. My first truck was a 94000 lb Freightliner. I could legally pull most 3 axles, an occasional (not fully loaded) 4 axle and Rocky Mountain doubles. I don't think Swift has any 4 axle Volvos but I could be wrong. My earlier scenario is a most likely scenario scenario. Again, I could be wrong but that is so rare . .
.
Originally Posted by cdswans
I made no attempt to diminish the significance of the inexperienced Driver. The news story has a few gaps, understandably and my aim was to help fill them. I have first hand experience with that freight on that road and under those conditions, with and without a trainer.That inexperienced Driver had a heavy, top heavy load at night through tricky turns on a wet road. My guess is he found himself going too fast for conditions and either overeacted or reacted too little or too late. Should he have been allowed to drive it while the trainer slept? How should I know? Had he been able to impress the trainer up to that point or was the trainer just lazy? Who knows? When did the poop hit the fan and would the trainer have been able to intervene had he been in the seat? Who knows?
Not all inexperienced Drivers wreck. I didn't. Most don't. A blanket indictment of Swift's training methods is ludicrous. Every major fleet trains the exact same way and enjoy the same rate of success that Swift has. Do a lot of Drivers have negative impressions of Swift training? They sure do. A lot of Drivers have negative opinions about every aspect of the company. I may just fall over dead if I ever hear someone pay Swift a compliment.
As far as the equipment goes, you can have an 80000 lb tractor uprated to 94000 by paying a little extra dough at registration and there are probably plenty of 94000 rated Volvos. My first truck was a 94000 lb Freightliner. I could legally pull most 3 axles, an occasional (not fully loaded) 4 axle and Rocky Mountain doubles. I don't think Swift has any 4 axle Volvos but I could be wrong. My earlier scenario is a most likely scenario scenario. Again, I could be wrong but that is so rare . .
.
CD...the highlighted part of your statement explains quite well, why the trainer should have been awake and in the seat.
I don't have a problem with Swift. I have a problem with a trainer sleeping in the bunk, while his "trainee" is dying at the wheel. And yes..I'm quite sure I saw 4-axle Volvos while in Portland and Tacoma last week.
I don't know how many trips you have made through Olympia...but I traveled that route from January 1988 through February 2005, sometimes twice a night, each direction. I-5 through Oly is just not that bad a road.
As I stated in my reply to Big Jeep, the WSP will know what happened, after reviewing the camera tapes. You can bet they started that proccess as soon as the first Trooper was on scene. If they issue a public report, we will all know what happened.