um.... sorry I did not follow that.

Bottom line..... you sign the contract and you are responsible for the taxes owed, regardless of what the company does.

Contract or no contract the IRS looks at a Individual Contractors relationship differently especially in terms of Social Security taxes.

IRS Regulation § 31.3401 (c)-1


Note: Under certain conditions, the taxes and penalties may exceed 40 percent of the amount paid to the individual.


In order for an individual to be compensated as an independent contractor, the following four criteria must all be met:


The employer does not control or direct the performance of the task; i.e., the individual is and will continue to be free to use whatever means he or she deems appropriate to accomplish the task

The task or service being performed is outside the regular expertise, duties, and/or consulting independence of existing employer employees

The task is of short duration and is not indicative of an ongoing relationship (contractual relationships that are longer than 30 days, with very few exceptions, indicate that an employee/employer relationship rather than an independent contractor relationship exists)

and


A written agreement exists with the employer that spells out the task or service(s) to be performed as required on the Consultant/Independent Contractor Determination Checklist.

Thus the IRS could care less about the employer contract as much as the point does the contractual employment include "free to use whatever means he or she deems appropriate to accomplish the task "

I have done sone research and have seen rulings that Forced Dispatch crosses that line (Remember the IRS rules on a case by case baisis) ... as would be forced routing., and the employer would be subject to employment taxes along with substantial penalties.

That does not mean that a company might not use forced dispatch with its contracted drivers. It just means that an IRS agent might rule that yes the contractor provided his/her own tools (the truck) but that the employer dictated how the job would be accomplished and thus should pay the SS and Medicare taxes.

DOES NOBODY REMBER,OOIDA SUED PRIME FOR UNLAWFUL LEASE PRACTICES.THE ONLY REASON OOIDA LOST IS BECAUSE COURT WAS HELD IN SPRINGFIED MO....JUDGE WOULD NOT GRANT A CHANGE OF VENU..SOUNDS LIKE PRIME HAD THE JUDGE ON THE PAYROLL.

Or perhaps OOIDA's crack-team of lawyers (or is that team of lawyers on crack?) isn't worth the $45 a year that the members are paying.

No it doesn't. :roll:

Prime doesn't have forced dispatch. But as with all companies if you keep turning down loads you will do some sitting and if your continually late you will be starved out.

No you will never own the truck but every 3 years you can get into a new truck and most all of the major repairs will all be covered under warranty as well as that $100,000.00 or better you pay in lease payments over the 3 years all come off your taxes where as if you buy a truck you can only take depreciation off. So some may not like it but for others it works out fine.

My credit sucked from a divorce so it fit my needs just fine and I made good money. I even went through 3 leases. If I wasn't disabled I would still be leasing from Prime.

I have to admit that they do tend to prefer teams and they kind of try to guide you in that direction while leasing.

OOIDA lost because they had a weak case. They tried to assert class action status and the US District court for Western Missouri ruled that class action status was improper and subsequently dismissed the lawsuit. The eighth circuit US court of Appeals upheld all the rulings from the lower court so I guess prime has all THEM on payroll too.

The members of OOIDA even get to foot the over half million dollar lawyers fees incurred by Prime. Maybe that will teach OOIDA that it's pennywise and poundfoolish to be suing everybody all the damn time. :roll:

As usual, the only ones to make money are the scheister lawyers. :lol:

[quote="century451"]
No you will never own the truck but every 3 years you can get into a new truck and most all of the major repairs will all be covered under warranty as well as that $100,000.00 or better you pay in lease payments over the 3 years all come off your taxes where as if you buy a truck you can only take depreciation off. So some may not like it but for others it works out fine.

My credit sucked from a divorce so it fit my needs just fine and I made good money. I even went through 3 leases. If I wasn't disabled I would still be leasing from Prime.
quote]


You can buy a pretty nice truck for $100,000. And you would actually OWN something at the end. You can deduct the depreciation and interest you pay when buying a truck.

[quote="GMAN"]i would think that aside from the financial and business side of it, just like owning a home instead of renting, it would give you a sense of pride in ownership.

It is a good feeling to know the truck you are driving is paid free and clear and you don't have to worry about making payments. 8)

Working for Prime is like discussing politics or religion. It will always cause an argument. The bottom line is that as long as the person working there is satisfied and make the money they desire then it makes no difference what anybody else thinks.

There is a large percentage of drivers that have been with Prime for many years and are making fantastic money. Of course there are drivers that lost everything they had as well. I think that's more of an individual result do to bad management than a company result due to greed.

Probably the hardest thing I found at Prime was Playing Basketball with Robert Low. If you know what that means then maybe you know more about the company than what you heard from ol "BUBBA"