Hopefully the tweaking will involve remembering the concept of Due Process of law. Not providing drivers ways to appeal these summary decisions flies in the face of the core aspects of American law as demonstrated in both the Fifth Amendment (for the Federal Government) and the Fourteenth Amendment (for states)
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
IF they did make it retroactive (ex post facto) they'd be in violation of Article I Section 9 of the US Constitution which makes retroactive laws of this nature illegal, as well as the Fifth Amendment's provision against double jeopardy (since being added to history would be a punishment in addition to any standing fines/points already imposed for the infraction) Quote:
|
Quote:
I figured no injuries or any real property damage outside of the truck itself, so a thin-line perhaps? |
Quote:
no moving violation for 20 years then in 07 a slow mover hung me out in my car in the left lane after 20 miles of 38 mph.65 in a 55. (68 in 55 ) also had jury duty so i paid up. this morning bootcamp is parked on a curve on steep hill and pops me for 5 over in my car(47 in 35) i got home and turned on the scanner and bootcamp and his buddy are having a contest to see who writes the most fines and are assigning points depending on us highway or state route.he sed he was too busy too cuff me up to check the serial numbers on on my permitted concealed glock. no violations in the slow semi-truck tho except the overload a heavy hauler always has on mvr im gona have to add up the points soon |
Quote:
Or (was it Werner?) that was chased in Spokane a few years ago... Let his wife/girlfriend out, then went downtown? (or something like that.) CSA-2010 may reduce them, but will not stop then. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:03 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.