![]() |
Originally Posted by got mud?
(Post 450710)
You would think that a 62 year old man would know by now that winning like a little girl doesn't fix the problem.
stonefly |
what about whining like a big girl?
|
winning like a little girl
what did he win? |
Originally Posted by Fredog
(Post 450725)
what about whining like a big girl?
p.s. nice catch on the whining not winning. lol oops |
Originally Posted by Fredog
(Post 450726)
winning like a little girl
what did he win? |
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
(Post 450530)
This entire thread is nothing more than "waah waah we're not making enough money so we need the gubberment to help us". Learn to adapt or get out of the game.
Fundamentally, the removal of the split sleeper berth provision is an unspoken government directive which may be interpreted, "We will tell you when to sleep and why." A populace that can be counted upon to comply with the provisions of such a directive will certainly provide further opportunities for a government to restrict civil liberties. Every time the government takes another step, and the rules are less reasonable, should we respond by becoming more compliant? The enslavement of a populace by any regime need not be a conspiracy. It is essentially a spiritual matter. The only thing necessary for the spirit to envelop us is for good men to do nothing. The mandatory eight hour block of sleep...the EOBR... We truckers are one step away from having a law enforcement officer know, to the second, when we park our trucks and when we move them. We are two steps away from being being picked off at will and being fined, placed out of service, or perhaps arrested, for unlawfully choosing when to sleep and when to drive. Every time the government takes another step, it will be done quickly and efficiently. Eventually, if good men do not interfere, Americans will have our global positions tightly monitored, pinned down to the second and to within a meter, by state of the art surveillance technology. This will happen in increments, each in the name of safety, or in the name of safeguarding our freedom. The preceding is not far fetched. If the EOBR becomes a mandated part of HOS enforcement, it is only a little farther down the road for the rest of America. stonefly |
Originally Posted by stonefly
(Post 451569)
The Patriot Act passed easily into law. All measures which infringe upon our liberty will be efficient. The removal of the split sleeper berth provision from HOS rules represents a greater loss of human rights than does the Patriot Act.
|
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
(Post 450456)
Yeah, it's a gubberment conspiracy. Break out the tin foil.
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
(Post 451577)
:rofl::rofl::rofl: The enslavement of a populace by any regime need not be a conspiracy. It is essentially a spiritual matter. The only thing necessary for the spirit to envelop us is for good men to do nothing. |
Not being able to adapt to new regulations is not enslavement. It is laziness. If everyone were incapable of adapting, you might possibly have a valid point.
|
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
(Post 451584)
Not being able to adapt to new regulations is not enslavement. It is laziness. If everyone were incapable of adapting, you might possibly have a valid point.
|
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved