![]() |
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
(Post 448779)
If that's the case, you've never really had your logs checked out on the road. The neatness of the log is irrelevant to the correctness of the log.
|
Originally Posted by Rev.Vassago
(Post 448756)
§395.8 Driver’s record of duty status.
(c) For each change of duty status, the name of the city, town or village, with State abbreviation, shall be recorded. Because the driver then took at least 2 consecutive hours off duty, he or she accumulated another 10 hours of rest in two separate, qualifying periods totaling 10 hours. The other point might be whether a flag is needed if a change of duty to line 4 or even 3 occurred at the same location as last flagged. I KNOW what the regs say. I also KNOW that J.J. Kellar doesn't show such a flag in their instructions for scannable logs. Perhaps, you would like to call THEM and correct THEM, too. (They also don't show a bracket.) As I stated earlier, my logs have been checked thoroughly a few times by DOT officers who were LOOKING for any and all violations. It is their JOB (partly) to raise revenue for the state by ticketing us truckers for even the most minor mistake. I will say that in most if not all cases where I have a duty status change at the same location, I use brackets. But, J.J. Kellar doesn't show that they are needed OR that a new flag is needed for each change of duty at the same location. But, MANY times, I have flagged a stop going to line 1 for an hour or two to eat and shower, then dropped to line 2 as we left out with the other guy driving. I NEVER flag that change.... and I NEVER hear about it from the DOT or my company. I believe this thread began with Matcat trying to simplify the program (especially the remarks section) as an improvement over the messy, anal method that DDL uses. I gave my opinion. I believe HIS program would pass muster with Kellar, and he could probably get a job with them. YOUR method would obviously get you a job with the makers of DDL. |
Originally Posted by golfhobo
(Post 448832)
This started off (I believe) with me saying that no flag was needed for a change of status from line 1 to line 2 as they are BOTH considered as OFF DUTY.
Using your "logic", no notation would be required when switching between lines 3 and 4, because lines 3 and 4 are both ON DUTY. |
Well a former swifty, who uses scannable JJ Keller logs, and was tought by their method. Brackets never have been used, demonstrated, or other wise mentioned. Considering my entire time with swift I never had a log violation of any sort. I feel like giving some examples :)
The grid and remarks as the program I am working on displays right now: http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/h...ruckin/ss4.gif That is exactly how I log in real life, except on that last flag I would not even have a comment, nor would I flag a toll either. Compare that to this PDF which is an image of DDL JJ Keller log http://www.driversdailylog.com/_them...0803log%20.pdf Quite honestly that DDL log gives me a headache just looking at the remarks. |
Originally Posted by matcat
(Post 448868)
Well a former swifty, who uses scannable JJ Keller logs, and was tought by their method. Brackets never have been used, demonstrated, or other wise mentioned. Considering my entire time with swift I never had a log violation of any sort. I feel like giving some examples :)
The grid and remarks as the program I am working on displays right now: http://i259.photobucket.com/albums/h...ruckin/ss4.gif That is exactly how I log in real life, except on that last flag I would not even have a comment, nor would I flag a toll either. Compare that to this PDF which is an image of DDL JJ Keller log http://www.driversdailylog.com/_them...0803log%20.pdf Quite honestly that DDL log gives me a headache just looking at the remarks. If you never flagged a toll the your logs were false. Along this same line. If this is causing so much of a hassle what is it going to be like when you get to the rules? Don't you ever preview your post? kc0iv |
Originally Posted by kc0iv
(Post 448895)
What gives me a headache is having to scroll back and forth because of YOUR over sized scans. Plus it appears lines of text is being covered.
If you never flagged a toll the your logs were false. Along this same line. If this is causing so much of a hassle what is it going to be like when you get to the rules? Don't you ever preview your post? kc0iv And no a line is not getting covered up, it is the way I took the screen shot, that window is not maximized on my desktop, it only takes up a piece of it, the actual programming tool I use to program it is behind it, when I cropped it I didn't crop it perfectly so some of the code is visible. Also please state regulations that require you to log a toll. Tolls do not have to be logged! Your company might require it but it is not an FMCSA regulation of any kind. |
| All times are GMT -12. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved